Drone Photography Aesthetics: Exploring the Drone Photograph for Cycling

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: May 31, 2023
Keywords:
Aesthetics Drone Photography Cycling

Main Article Content

Jatechan Kerdsuk
Lecturer, Faculty of Communication Arts and Designs, Stamford International University
Lattasith Taweesuk
Lecturer, Educational Technology and Innovation Program, Faculty of Education, Nakhon Pathom Rajabhat University

Abstract

This article aims to study the aesthetics of drone photography in the case of long-distance cycling event through the camera angles, photography compositions and moments. The drone photographs produce special characteristics within the photograph as well as its aesthetics that only drone is capable of, in which are different from on land photography. The study found that there are three different kinds of drone photograph including: high long-shot, high medium-shot and medium top view. Even though, the drone photography has freedom for taking high angle photos but there are limitations to communicate meanings. So, it is necessary to include ground photography unit to communicate meanings clearly. To communicate through drone photography is very unique in a way that it communicates the context of subject rather than the subject

Article Details

How to Cite
Kerdsuk, J. ., & Taweesuk, L. . (2023). Drone Photography Aesthetics: Exploring the Drone Photograph for Cycling. SIAM COMMUNICATION REVIEW, 22(1), 233–241. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/commartsreviewsiamu/article/view/265838
Issue
Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): January-June 2023
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

กิตติธัช ศรีฟ้า. (2565). หลากสีสันโลกใต้ท้องทะเล. วารสารนิเทศสยามปริทัศน์, 21(1), 268–281.

ณัฐวุฒิ สิงห์หนองสวง. (2565). มนต์เสน่ห์แห่งการบันทึกภาพพลุ. วารสารนิเทศสยามปริทัศน์, 21(2), 77-89.

Boger, R., Low, R., and Nelson, P., (2020). Identifying hurricane impacts on Barbuda using citizen science ground observations, drone photography and satellite imagery. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W11-23-2020

Germen, M. (2016). Alternative cityscape visualisation: drone shooting as a new dimension in urban photography. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, (EVA 2016), London: UK.

Hollman, V. C. (2020). Drone Photography and the Re-aestheticisation of Nature. In Schelhaas, B., Ferretti, F., Reyes Novaes, A., Schmidt di Friedberg, M. (Eds.), Decolonising and Internationalising Geography.: Essays in the History of Contested Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Lauren Alex O’Hagan & Elisa Serafinelli. (2022). Transhistoricizing the Drone: A Comparative Visual Social Semiotic Analysis of Pigeon and Domestic Drone Photography, Photography and Culture, 2022, 1-25. DOI: 10.1080/17514517.2022.2116899

Richard Garvey–Williams. (2015). Mastering Composition: The Definitive Guide for Photographers. UK.: Ammonite Press.

Stichelbaut, B. (2006). The application of First World War aerial photography to archaeology: The Belgian images. Antiquity, 80(307), 161-172. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00093339

Yi-Ling Chen, Wei-Tse Lee, Liwei Chan, Rong-Hao Liang, & Bing-Yu Chen. (2015). Direct view manipulation for drone photography. SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Posters (SA '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, Article 23, 1. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/2820926.2820945