A Comparative Study of Differences in Media Literacy Among Thai Youth

Main Article Content

Chantana Papattha
Kannika Tohmeena
Duriyang Komkhum

Abstract

This quantitative research aimed to compare differences in media literacy among Thai youth. A questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 680 Thai youths aged 18–25 who were studying for a bachelor's degree at universities in the central region. The data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-tests, and one-way ANOVA. The results showed that different demographic characteristics were associated with differences in the media literacy of Thai youth in some aspects. It was found that gender did not affect the overall level of media literacy, except in media understanding, where female youths had a significantly higher mean score than male youths at the .05 level. Age had a significant effect on the difference in media literacy in three areas: media reception, media analysis, and media utilization, while there was no difference in media understanding and media evaluation. For family status, significant differences were found in all aspects. Youths living alone or with friends had higher scores than those living with their parents, especially in media reception, media analysis, media understanding, and media evaluation. Similarly, living arrangements showed significant differences in all aspects. Youths living in rented rooms or with relatives had higher media literacy scores than those living in family homes, especially in media analysis, media understanding, media evaluation, and media utilization. These findings reflected those demographic factors played different roles in the level of media literacy among youths. Age, family type, and living arrangements tended to be variables that influenced the development and application of media literacy skills more than gender.

Article Details

How to Cite
Papattha, C. ., Tohmeena , K. ., & Komkhum, D. . (2025). A Comparative Study of Differences in Media Literacy Among Thai Youth. Journal of Siam Communication Arts Review, 24(2), 219–243. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/commartsreviewsiamu/article/view/285924
Section
Research Articles

References

ณัฐธินี ชงโค. (2566). ปัจจัยเชิงสาเหตุที่ส่งผลต่อความฉลาดทางดิจิทัลของนิสิตระดับอุดมศึกษา. วารสารวิจัยและพัฒนาการศึกษา, 18(2), 112–130.

ทิพวัลย์ อัตถาหาร และเสกสรรค์ ทองคำบรรจง. (2563). การวิเคราะห์ความเปลี่ยนแปลงของความฉลาดทางดิจิทัลในกลุ่มนักเรียนมัธยมศึกษา. ศึกษาศาสตร์ มมร. 8(1), 137-145.

พนม คลี่ฉายา. (2564). การรู้เท่าทันสื่อของเยาวชนไทยในยุคสื่อดิจิทัล. วารสารวิชาการนิเทศศาสตร์, 9(2), 45–63.

วิรุฬรัตน์ สหลง. (2566). ความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างเมตาคอกนิชันและการกล้าแสดงออกกับความฉลาดทางดิจิทัลของนิสิตมหาวิทยาลัย. วารสารวิชาการสังคมศาสตร์, 16(1), 101–118.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Buckingham, D. (2019). The media education manifesto. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1938)

Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.

Lee, S. J., & Chae, Y. G. (2012). Balancing participation and risks in children’s internet use: The role of internet literacy and parental mediation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(5), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0552

Lee, A. Y. L. (2016). Media education in the school 2.0 era: Teaching media literacy in Hong Kong. Global Media and China, 1(4), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416667129

Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N. (2012). The influences of information literacy, internet addiction and parenting styles on internet risks. New Media & Society, 14(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410406

Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people, and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335

Livingstone, S. (2014). Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites. Communications, 39(3), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0113

Martens, H. (2010). Evaluating media literacy education: Concepts, theories and future directions. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2(1), 1–22.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.

UNESCO. (2018). Media and information literacy curriculum for educators and learners. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.