OPINIONS OF KINDERGARTEN TEACHERS AND SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS TOWARDS ONLINE INNOVATIVE CLIMATE AND THE ROLE OF PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO ENHANCE INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53848/irdssru.v9i1.213785Keywords:
innovative climate, online innovative climate, private partnership, innovative behavior, kindergarten teachers.Abstract
The purposes of this study were 1) to study the opinions of kindergarten
teachers towards the online innovative climate, the role of private partnership and the innovative behavior of kindergarten teachers. 2) To study the opinions of the school administrators towards the role of private partnership in enhancing innovative behavior of kindergarten teachers. This study employed a mixed-method research consisting of two parts. Part 1 involved a quantitative research to study the opinions of kindergarten teachers towards the online innovative climate, the role of private partnership, and the innovative behavior of kindergarten teachers. The sample group consisted of 398 kindergarten teachers. Part 2 was a qualitative research to study the opinions of the school administrators towards the role of private partnerships in enhancing the innovative behavior of kindergarten teachers. The results showed 1) opinions of kindergarten teachers towards the online innovative climate and the role of privatepartnership was high, while opinions of kindergarten teachers towards the innovativebehavior of kindergarten teachers was moderate. The online innovative climate and the role of private partnerships had a positive relation with the innovative behavior of kindergarten teachers. statistically and significantly, at 0.01. 2) School administrators pointed out that private partnerships had a significant role towards innovative behavior
enhancement of kindergarten teachers.
References
creativity in organizations: on doing
what you love and loving what you
do. California Management
Review. 40(1), 39-58.
Amo, W. B. (2005). Employee innovation
behavior. Thesis of Doctor
Oeconomia, Graduate School of
Business, Regional University,
Norway.
Anderson, N. R. & West, M. A. (1998).
Measuring climate for work
groupinnovation: development and
validation of the team climate
inventory. Journal of Organizational
Behavior. 19, 235-258.
Biech, E. (1996). Creativity & innovation:
The ASTD trainer’s sourcebook.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Binnewies, C. & Gromer, M. (2012).
Creativity and innovation at work:
The role of work characteristics
and personal initiative.
Psicothema, 24, 101-105.
Bryan, J., & Henry, L. (2012). A model for
building school family community
partnerships: Principles and
process. Journal of Counseling &
Development, 90(4), 408-420.
Chang, J. C. & Yang, Y.L. (2012). The effect
of organization's innovational
climate on student’s creative selfefficacy and innovative behavior.
The Journal of Business and
Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 75-100.
Cropley, A. J.: (1997). Fostering creativity
in the classroom: general
principles. Creativity Research
Handbook, 1, 83–114.
Epstein.J.L. (1995). School/ family/
community partnerships: Caring for
the children we care. Phi Delta
Kappan, 76,701-702.
Goodyear, P. (2002). Psychological
foundation for networked
learning. In Steeples, C. & Jones, C.
(eds.) Networked Learning:
Perspectives and Issues, 49-75
Isaksen, S.G. and Lauer, K.J. (2001).
Perceptions of the best and worst
climates for creativity: preliminary
validation evidence for the
situational outlook questionaire.
Creative Research Journal. 13 (2),
171-184.
Janssen, Onne. (2000). Job demand,
perceptions of effort-reward fairness
andinnovative work behaviour.
Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology. 73,
287 – 302.
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001).
Toward a multi-dimensional
measure of individual Innovative
behavior. Journal of Intellectual
Capital. 2 (3), 284-296.
Moudarres, D., & Ezer, H. (1995).
Collaboration with individuals,
families, and groups in the
community. Paper presented at
International Conference on
Community Health Centres,
Montreal.
Nemerzitski, S and et.al (2013).
Constructing model of teachers’
innovative behaviour in school
environment. The Journal of
teachers and teaching: theory
and practice, Retrieved June 1,
2013, from http://dx.doi.org/
10.1080/13540602.2013.770230.
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003).
The social side of creativity: A
static and dynamic social
network perspective. Academy of
Management Review, 28, 89-106.
Sanders, M. G. (1998). The effects of
school, family, and community
support on the academic
achievement of African American
adolescents. Urban Education,
33(3), 385-409.
Scott, Susanne G.; & Bruce, Reginald A.
(1994). Determinants of innovative
behavior: a path model of
individual innovation in the
workplace. Academy of Management
Journal. (3), 580-607.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ สถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
