Models For Developing Middle-level Administrators Transformational Leadership in Normal Universities in Hunan

Authors

  • Patchara Dechhome Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • Ma Yugui Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • Niran Sutheeniran Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • Jittawisut Wimuttipanya Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Model, Transformational Leadership, Normal Universities in Hunan

Abstract

The objectives of this research were 1) to study the current situation of the middle-level administrators transformational leadership in normal universities in Hunan 2) to  provide the model for developing the middle-level administrators transformational leadership in normal universities in Hunan 3) to evaluate the suitability and feasibility of the model for developing the middle-level administrators transformational leadership in normal universities in Hunan The sample were 278 middle-level administrators using stratified sampling and simple random sampling involved in the transformational leadership from 5 normal Universities in Hunan. The Interview group was 15 high-level administrators. The research instruments were documents analysis, questionnaire, structured interview and evaluate form. The statistic to analyze the data were percentage, mean, standard deviation and content analysis.

                The results were found that 1) the current situation of transformational leadership of middle-level administrators in 6 aspects was at medium level. Considering the results of this research aspects ranged from the highest to lowest level were as follow: the highest level was Intellectual stimulation, followed by Morale modeling, Inspirational motivation, Idealized influence, and High performance expectations. Individualized consideration was the lowest mean. 2) The provide development models for developing transformational leadership of middle-level administrators in normal universities in Hunan, including 6 aspects, with a total of 60 measures: 1) Idealized influence; 2) Inspirational motivation; 3) Intellectual stimulation; 4) Individualized consideration;5) Morale modeling; 6) High performance expectations. 3) The suitability and feasibility of models for developing the middle-level administrators transformational leadership of normal universities in Hunan in 6 aspects were at highest level.

Author Biographies

Patchara Dechhome, Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University

Assistant Professor in Program in Educational Administration Faculty of Education Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University. (Co Advisor) *Corresponding author, E-mail: patchara.de@bsru.ac.th

Ma Yugui, Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University

Doctor of Philosophy Program in Educational Administration Faculty of Education Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University.

Niran Sutheeniran , Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University

Associate Professor in Program in Educational Administration Faculty of Education Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University. (Advisor)

Jittawisut Wimuttipanya , Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University

Associate Professor in Program in Educational Administration Faculty of Education Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University. (Co Advisor)

References

Bass, B.M. (1998). Transformational Leadership : Industrial, Military ,and Educational Impact. Mahwah, New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bennis,W.& Nanus,B.Leaders. (1985). The Strategies for Takings Charge. New York, HarperCollins.

Burns, J. M. (2012). Leadership. Open Road Media.

Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel Leadership: Commitment and Charisma in the Revolutionary Process. New York : Free Press.

Huang Shilin.(2020). Research on the cultivation path of middle-level cadre leadership in higher vocational colleges under the background of Double High Plan. Hubei Open Vocational College Journal ,36-37.

Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.

Krejcie, R.V., & D.W. Morgan. (1970). “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities”. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30(3) : 607 – 610.

Leithwood, K.A. (1992). “The Move toward Transformational Leadership,” Educational Leadership. 49 (5) : 8 - 12

Li Chaoping, & Shi Kan. (2005). The structure and measurement of transformational leadership. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(6), 803-811.

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C. A., & Williams, E. S. (1999). Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of management, 25(6), 897-933.

Podsakoff, P.M., Mackebzic, S.B., Morrman, R.H., et al. (1990). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers’ Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors,” Leadership Quarterly. 1(2) : 107-142.

Sergiovanni, T. (1990). “Adding Value to Leadership Gets Extraordinary Results,” Educational Leadership. 47 (8) : 23 - 27

Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2017). Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16656612

Wang, H., & Liu, Z. (2020). Leadership challenges in Chinese universities: Balancing academic excellence and organizational management. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1335–1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1713732

Yukl, G.A. (1989). Leadership in Organizations. 2 th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย