Development of Efficiency Administration Regarding Human Resources of the Election Commission Office
Main Article Content
Abstract
The main objectives of this study were to study (1) problems of efficiency in administration of human resources of the Election Commission Office, (2) development roadmap of efficiency in administration of human resources of the Election Commission Office, and (3) model of administration regarding human resources of the Election Commission Office. The research methodology was designed as mixed method research using the quantitative research as the principal means supported by the qualitative research. Population was all 1,050 officers and permanent employees of the Election Commission office, The sampling size total 850 completed sets of questionnaire. Analyzed data was summarized in contingency table with description. Statistics used were mean, standard deviation, multiple regression, and Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient. The structured in-depth interview was applied with 9 experts for qualitative data.
Findings were (1) the significant problem of efficiency in administration of human resources was insufficient training of the officers the Election Commission Office’s on their own authority and missions, such as knowledge of election administration as well as clear and systematic guidelines to resolve the election problems, (2) the significant development roadmap of efficiency in administration of human resources was the training and development of the officers on the responsibility aspect according to the Royal Guidance concept, especially the responsibility coinciding with scope of authority and position of each officer, and (3) the significant model of administration of human resources was to create a model of administration of human resources according to the Royal Guidance and to apply key performance indicators of the development roadmap of efficiency in administration of human resources of the Election Commission Office.
Article Details
Academic articles, research articles, and book reviews in the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal are author’s opinions, and not the publisher’s, and is not the responsibility of the Ph.D. in Social Sciences Journal Philosophy Association, Ramkhamhaeng University. (In the case that research is done on human, the researcher has to be trained in Ethics for Doing Research on Human Training and has to produce the evidence of the training).
References
Chandarasorn, V., & Pathranarakul, P. (2000). Open system evaluation. Bangkok: Sahai Block & Printing. [In Thai]
Kuhirun, R. (2015). The administration efficiency with regard to auditing of the office of the state audit according to the royal initiatives. Srinakharinwirot Research and Development (Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), 7(14), 64-76. [In Thai]
Potitan, W. (1981). Democracy: Concept and democratic country model. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press. [In Thai]
Wiratnipawan, W. (2003). Administration and management municipalities in the political reform era. Bangkok: Forepace. [In Thai]
Wiratnipawan, W. (2005). Management and administration of the development of the organization under the constitution and government agencies. Bangkok: Nititham. [In Thai]
Wiratnipawan, W. (2009). Management administration of state agencies: Comparative analysis of indicators. Bangkok: Forepace. [In Thai]
Wiratnipawan, W. (2013). Principles and techniques of research, thesis, and report writing. Bangkok: Forepace. [In Thai]