An Analysis of EFL Students’ Writing Needs: Considerations for Writing Task-Based Course Design

Main Article Content

Hieu Manh Do

Abstract

The present study adopts the four-step framework of course development processes proposed by Graves (1996) to develop a writing course for EFL Vietnamese undergraduates. A total of 60 students were asked to take a writing test and a survey about writing problems to identify their “objective needs”. Then “subjective needs” were collected from interviews. In addition, the three language teachers were invited to the semi-structured interviews to collect their perspectives on teaching writing, which were analyzed in parallel with students’ needs. The findings show that students’ writing levels are low-intermediate and intermediate, and they have major problems with the organization of ideas, followed by grammar and idea development. Regarding teaching, students’ main concerns are a lack of writing activities and teacher feedback, which may be due to large classes and heavy workloads. To improve students’ writing problems, more writing tasks are needed, including pre-planning (idea development), performance (writing practice), and post-writing (peer feedback, teacher feedback, final draft). These writing tasks are arranged into different phases to help teachers follow up on students’ writing practice and reduce their workloads. Considering these conditions, a proposed writing task-based course was suitable to develop, including the five components of course design: context; goals and objectives; content; method and material; and assessment, as professional support for EFL or ESL language teachers in designing a writing course that can be used for teaching, training, or coaching in a similar context.

Article Details

How to Cite
Do, H. M. (2023). An Analysis of EFL Students’ Writing Needs: Considerations for Writing Task-Based Course Design. REFLections, 30(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i2.266643
Section
Research articles

References

Al Fadda, H. (2012). Difficulties in academic writing: From the perspective of King Saud University postgraduate students. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 123-130. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p123

Al-Gharabally, M. (2015). The writing difficulties faced by L2 learners and how to minimize them. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 3(5), 42-49.

Ali, H. I. H., & Salih, A. R. A. (2013). Perceived views of language teachers on the use of needs analysis in ESP materials writing. English Language Teaching, 6(3), 11-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n3p11

Alkhatib, N. (2021). First year university students’ writing: A one year journey of English writing development. Asian EFL Journal, 28(1), 9-29.

Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Springer.

Boonyarattanasoontorn, P. (2017). An investigation of Thai students’ English language writing difficulties and their use of writing strategies. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 111-118. https://dx.doi.org/10.26500/JARSSH-02-2017-0205

Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Heinle & Heinle.

Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge University Press.

Christison, M., & Murray, D. E. (2014). What English language teachers need to know Vol. III: Designing curriculum. Routledge.

Dan, T. C., Duc, V. M., & Chau, P. T. H. (2017). An investigation into common mistakes in paragraph writing of the first-year English-majored students: A case study in Can Tho university, Vietnam. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 19(4), 308-330. https://tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/view/108480

Do, H. M. (2022). Plagiarism tutorials in teaching academic writing for L2 Vietnamese undergraduates. International TESOL & Technology Journal, 17(1), 44-62. https://connect.academics.education/index.php/itj/article/view/132/151

Do, H. M. (2023a). Does collaborative prewriting discussion always help? L2 Journal, 15(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5070/L215159933

Do, H. M. (2023b). Pedagogical benefits and practical concerns of writing portfolio assessment: Suggestions for teaching L2 writing. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 27(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27105a4

Do, M. H., & Cheng, Y. H. (2021). Needs analysis of hotel front desk staff: Considerations for ESP course design. International Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 1(1), 69-92. https://connect.academics.education/index.php/ijesp/article/view/149/85

Do, H. M., & Phan, H. L. T. (2023). Vietnamese undergraduate English-majored students’ beliefs about English language learning. English as a Foreign Language International Journal, 27(2), 40-60. https://www.academics.education/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/EFLIJ-June-2023-Vol-27-Issue-2.pdf

Ekşi, G. Y. (2012). Peer review versus teacher feedback in process writing: How effective? International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 13(1), 33-48.

Elander, J., Harrington, K., Norton, L., Robinson, H., & Reddy, P. (2006). Complex skills and academic writing: A review of evidence about the types of learning required to meet core assessment criteria. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262379

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3).

Ellis, R. (2021). A case study of one teacher’s introduction to task-based language teaching: Insights for the development of a professional development programme. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3(1), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00020.ell

Farooq, M. S., Uzair-Ul-Hassan, M., & Wahid, S. (2020). Opinion of second language learners about writing difficulties in English language. South Asian Studies, 27(1), 183-194.

Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. ISBN-13: 978-0415894722

Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009

Folse, K. S., Muchmore-Vokoun, A., & Solomon, E. V. (2020). Great writing 2: Great paragraphs. Cengage Learning.

Generoso, J. C., & Arbon, A. M. M. (2020). Language needs analysis: An EAP curriculum design to develop foreign students’ English skills. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(2), 428-445. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.2.8.428

Gilabert, R. (2005). Evaluating the use of multiple sources and methods in needs analysis: A case study of journalists in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia (Spain). Second language needs analysis (pp. 182-199). Cambridge University Press.

Gilabert, R., & Malicka, A. (2021). From needs analysis to task-based design: Methodology, assessment and programme evaluation. Task-based language teaching and assessment (pp. 93-118). Springer.

Gravatt, B., Richards, J. C., & Lewis, M. (1997). Language needs in tertiary studies. University of Auckland.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Heinle & Heinle.

Graves, K. (Ed.). (1996). Teachers as course developers. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 0- 521-49768-X.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (2001). English for academic purposes. In R. Cater & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.019

Huang, L. S. (2010). Seeing eye to eye? The academic writing needs of graduate and undergraduate students from students’ and instructors’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 517-539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375372

Hutchinson, Т., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Khatter, S. (2019). An analysis of the most common essay writing errors among EFL Saudi female learners (Majmaah University). Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 10(3), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3466034

Kampookaew, P. (2020). An analysis of grammatical errors made by Thai EFL university students in an EAP writing class: Issues and recommendations. rEFLections, 27(2), 246–273. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/248862

Kim, N. (2022). Teaching L2 writing in large classes: The effects of peer feedback in different task sequences. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 19(3), 740-758. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.3.1.740

Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. Teaching English as a second or foreign Language (3rd ed., pp. 219-232). Heinle and Heinle.

Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. Second language needs analysis (pp. 19-76). Cambridge University Press.

Macalister, J., & Nation, I. S. P. (2020). Language curriculum design (2nd ed.). Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-376-19650-9

Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.

Newton, M. N., & Nation, I. S. P. (2021). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Nunan, D. (1985). Language teaching course design: Trends and issues. National Curriculum Resource Centre.

Otilia, S. M. (2015). Needs analysis in English for specific purposes. Annals of the Constantin Brâncuşi University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, 1(2), 54-55.

Ratnawati, R., Faridah, D., Anam, S., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2018). Exploring academic writing needs of Indonesian EFL undergraduate students. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(4), 420-432. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.31

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2003). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University press.

Richterich, R. (1980). A model for the definition of language needs of adults. Trim, Richterich, Van Ek, and Wilkins (pp. 31-62).

Schiro, M. S. (2013). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Sage.

Shrum, J. L., & Glisan, E. W. (2010). Teacher’s handbook: Contextualized language instruction. Heinle/Cengage.

Smagorinsky, P. (2008). Teaching English by design. Heinemenn.

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory into practice (4th ed.). Harcourt, Brace, & World.

Thirakunkovit, S., & Boonyaprakob, K. (2022). Developing academic writing skills through a task-based approach: A case study of students’ collaborative writing. rEFLections, 29(3), 526–548. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/261319

Wang, Y. H., & Liao, H. C. (2008). The application of learning portfolio assessment for students in the technological and vocational education system. Asian EFL Journal, 10(2), 132-154.

Willis, J. (2021). An evolution of a framework for TBLT: What trainers and teachers need to know to help learners succeed in task-based learning. Task-based language teaching and assessment (pp. 63-92). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_5

Yundayani, A., Emzir, E., & Rafli, Z. (2017). Need analysis: The writing skill instructional material context for academic purposes. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v6i1.771