Introduction of Property Distribution Principle to Thailand’s Narcotic Case
Keywords:
Confiscation measure, Narcotic cases, Value confiscation, Asset sharingAbstract
Objectives of this Research were: 1) to study the concept and principle of asset sharing, as appearing in international conventions and foreign laws; 2) to study enforcement of measures for confiscation and disposal of properties in Thailand’s narcotic cases; 3) to analyze enforcement of measures for confiscation and disposal of properties in the narcotic cases, both under the law on suppression of offenders in offenses relating to narcotics and other relevant laws, as well as introduction of the principles of value confiscation to Thailand’s narcotic cases; 4) to study and analyze prescription of criteria for introducing the principle of asset sharing to Thailand’s narcotic cases; and 5) to recommend approaches to amend the relevant laws for supporting the principle of asset sharing, as to be consistent with relevant international conventions and treaties, and support future international cooperation. The research methodology employed methods of qualitative research by using documentary research, in-depth interview, focus group, and holding seminars for hearing opinions. The research results were found that; 1) the principle of asset sharing, which is contained in several international conventions, is a universal principle, which must be consistently implemented in the domestic law of each civilized country; 2) in narcotic cases, there are problems with enforcing measures for asset confiscation in criminal matters and imposing of fine penalties, leading to inefficient proceedings against properties; 3) in narcotic cases, Thailand’s domestic laws do not conform with the universal principles and international conventions on promotion of international cooperation in detection, pursuit, seizure, confiscation or forfeiture of properties, and asset sharing; 4) introduction of asset sharing to Thailand’s narcotic cases requires amendments to several relevant laws; and 5) therefore, the researchers propose the recommendations to draft amendments to relevant laws, consisting of : the draft of an amendment to Act on the Measures for the Suppression of Offenders in an Offence Relating to Narcotics, B.E. 2534, Section 29, Section 30 and Section 31; the draft of an amendment to Anti-Money Laundering Act, B.E. 2542, Section 51 and Section 53; the draft of an amendment to the Penal Code, Section 35 and Section 36; and the draft of International Treaty on Mutual Assistance in Detection, Discovery, Confiscation or Sequestration and Seizure of Properties, and Sharing of Assets in Narcotic Cases.
References
ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint 2025: FORGING AHEAD TOGETHER, [Online]. Retrieved July 23, 2016, from http://www.mfa.go.th/asean/contents/files/asean-mediacenter-20160203-160850-836205.pdf.
Asset Seizure Bureau, Office of the Narcotic Control Board, Ministry of Justice. (n.d.). Manual of Asset Verification in Narcotic Case. (in Thai)
Boonyobhas, V., et al. (2004). Project on Research into Criminal Punishments Affecting Rights and Liberties of People under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2540. Task Force on Hospitality and Tourism, National Economic and Social Advisory Council.
(in Thai)
Buranaruangroj, T. Problems and Obstacles to International Cooperation in Criminal Matters with Respect to Recovery, Confiscation, Sequestration and Seizure of Properties, and Approaches to Solutions. Website of ASEAN Community Mission Centre, International
Affairs Department, Office of the Attorney General, from http:// www.asean.ago.go.th/asean-th/images/file/article/article_torsak.pdf. (in Thai)
Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, U.S. Department of State. (2014).
INCSR: Treaties, Agreements, and Asset Sharing. pp. 119-121 [Online]. Retrieved July 5, 2016, from http://www.state.gov/j/inl/rls/nrcrpt/2014/vol2/222469.htm.
Center for the Study of Democracy (CSD). Ognian Shentov, Alexander Stoyanov, and Maria Yordanova, editors. Disposal of the Confiscated Assets in the EU Member States: Laws and Practices. [Online]. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://www.csd.bg/artShow.
php?id=17103.
Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crimes, Strasbourg, 8.11.1990 [Online]. Retrieved June 4, 2016, from http://convention.ceo.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/141.htm.
Council of Europe Portal, Details of Treaty No. 198, APENDEX, [Online]. Retrieved May 29, 2016, from https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680482daf.
COURT LAW and JUSTICE: Key Issues in Crime and Punishment, William J. Chambliss, editor, (California, SAGE Publication, 2011).
ECOSOC resolution 2005/14 Model bilateral agreement on the sharing of confiscated proceeds of crime or property covered by the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic
Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988, available from, http://www.unodc.org/pdf/ECOSOC_resolution_2005-14.pdf.
Fleur Keyser-Ringnalda. (1992). European Integration with Regard to Confiscation of Proceed of Crime. European Law Review. 17(6), 499-515.
FRA European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, FRA Opinon-03/2012, “Opinion of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights on the Confiscation of proceeds of crime”, Vienna. 4 December 2012.
Gabriella Arcifa. (2014). European Area of Freedom Security & Justice, The new EU directive on Confiscation: a good (even if still prudent) starting point for the post-Lisbon EU strategy on tracking and confiscation illicit money. [Online]. Retrieved July 24, 2016,
from https://free-group.eu/2014/03/25/the-new-eu-directive-on-confiscation-a-goodeven-if-still-prudent-strating-point-for-the-post-lisbon-eu-strategy-on-tracking-andconfiscation-illicit-money/.
IMPACT STUDY ON CIVIL FORFEITURE, Project on criminal assets recovery in Serbia (CAR SERBIA), (Belgrade, Council of Europe, 2013), p.7 [Online]. Retrieved May 29, 2016, from http://www.coe.int/t/DGHL/cooperation/economiccrime/corruption/Publications/
CAR/Impact%20Study%20on%20Civil%20Forfeiture_EN.pdf.
International Law Division, Department of Justice Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Guide to Asset Recovery in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. [Online]. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://www.doj.gov.hk/lawdoc/mla2.pdf.
Jaiharn, N. (1990). Narratives of Criminal Law. Book 1. Regarding Punishments and Safety Measures. Bangkok: Thammasat University. (in Thai)
Jean-Pierre, B., Larissa, G., Clive, S., & Kevin M. S. Asset Recovery Handbook A Guide for Practitioners.
Legal, A. B., Office of the Narcotic Control Board, Ministry of Justice. (2008). Manual of Coordina tion and Collection of Evidence in Narcotic Case. (in Thai)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารมหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
ห้ามนำข้อความทั้งหมด หรือบางส่วนไปพิมพ์ซ้ำ เว้นแต่จะได้รับอนุญาตจากกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร