The Ecosystem of Educational Administration in Private Schools
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research aimed to 1) study the components of the Ecosystem of Educational Administration in Private schools and 2) analyze the ecological components of the Ecosystem of Educational Administration in Private schools. This study was applied from ecosystem theory and was mixed methodology with qualitative and quantitative. There were 250 sample from the experts, school administrators, teachers, and educational personnel/staff of private schools in Bangkok and perimeter who those under the Office of the Private Education Commission, Ministry of Education. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) from the research found that, The private school administration ecosystem has 7 main components as followings; (1) structural and component, (2) system and systematic, (3) interdisciplinary (4) interaction networks, (5) equilibrium dynamics, (6) diversity integration, and (7) synergy. The results of the conformity checked of the 7 components. There was a statistically significant positive correlation coefficient at the level of .01.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lesson for Public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 56-65. https://doi.org/info:doi/
Barney, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Berns, J. et al. (2005). Education Policy in Multi-Ethnic Societies: A Review of National Policies that Promote Coexistence and Social Inclusion. http://www.brandeis.edu/ethics/pdfs/publications/EducationPolicy.pdf
Chuichareon, A. (2019, Jan 26). Learning Ecosystem. Post Today Online. https://www.posttoday.com/economy/news/578269
Daft, R.L. (2008). New Era of Management (2nd ed). Thomson South-Western.
Diaz-Gibson, J. Daly, A.J. Balslev, G., Civis, M., & Liou, Y-H. (2020). The School Weavers Tool: Supporting School Leaders to Weave Learning Ecosystem. School Leadership and Management, 41(3). DOI:10.1080/13632434.2020.1770210
Erawan, P. (2019). Research and Organization Development in Schools (3rd ed.). Chulalongkorn University.
Grubb. P.J., & Whittaker, J.B. (1989). Toward a More Exact Ecology: 30th Symposium of the British Ecological Society. Cambridge University Press.
Hoy, W.K., & Miskel, C.G. (2013). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Itami, H. (1987), Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Harvard University Press.
Katane, I. (2009). Ecology of Education as a New Interdisciplinary Research Trend. Latvia University of Agriculture.
Kunthon, K. (2011, Feb 11). The Concept of Education Management in a Diverse Society Abroad. GotoKnow. https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/545057
Luksha, P., Cubista, J., Laszlo, A., Popovich, M., & Ninenko, I. (2018). Educational Ecosystems for Societal Transformation. Global Education Futures.
National Geographic. (2019, Oct 9). Ecosystem. NGThai. https://ngthai.com/science/25251/ecosystem/
Odum, E.P., & Barrett, G.W. (2005). Fundamentals of Ecology (5th ed.). Thomson Brooks.
Office of the Private Education Commission. (2020). Annual Report of 2020. Office of the Private Education Commission.
Office of the Basic Education Commission, Ministry of Education. (2010). School Network Standards: Networking Guide Jointly Develop and Promote the Potential of Learners. Agricultural Cooperative Printing Demonstrations of Thai co., Ltd.
Raj, S., & Verma, M. (2012). Ecology in Education for Peace: Implications for Teacher Education. IJERT, 3(4), 50-55.
Smith, R.G. (1996). The Structure of Communication. School Health, 36(5), 218-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1966.tb05564.x
Sutawong, W., Wetcha, P., Yawirach, P., & Toonkeaw, S. (2019). The Dynamic of Administration Affecting Education Quality of Schools under Chiang Rai Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. Journal of Social Academic, 12(2), 271-281.
The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST). (2017). Biology.
Wang, C.L., & Ahmed, P.K. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.