The Role of School Administrator Affecting the Successful Educational Resource Fundraising of School in the Bangkok Secondary Educational Service Area Office Two
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research are as follows: (1) the level of the role of school administrators under the authority of the Bangkok Secondary Education Area Office, District Two; (2) the success levels of educational resource mobilization under the authority of the Bangkok Secondary Education Area Office, District Two, (3) the relationship between the role of school administrators and the success of educational resource mobilization; and (4) the role of school administrators affecting the success of educational resource mobilization of schools under the authority of the Bangkok Secondary Education Area Office, District Two. The sample group included teachers under the authority of the Bangkok Secondary Education Area Office, District Two consisted of 364 candidates, The tool used a five-level estimation. The statistics used in the research were mean, percentage, standard deviation, Pearson correlation coefficient, and multiple regression and District Two was at the highest level; (2) the level of success in educational resource mobilization is at the highest level; 3) The roles of school administrators were correlated with the success of educational resource mobilization at a high level; and (4) the role of school administrators in the success of educational resource mobilization was statistically significant at a level of .05, whereas the role of school administrators, decision-making and interaction were statistically significant at a level of .05, but the information and information aspects were insignificant at a level of .05, with all of the variables contributing to the mobilization of educational resources of educational institutions by 56.4%.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
Changkwian, A. (2021). Administrator’s roles and the effectiveness of school under the secondary educational service area office Nakhon Pathom[Master’s thesis, Silpakorn University].
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed). Harper Collins.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on management inside our strange world of organizations. Collier Macmillan.
Office of the Education Council. (2019). Education resource mobilization model. https://backoffice.onec.go.th/uploads/Book/1673-file.pdf
Paophan, C. (2016). School administrators in the 21st century. Journal of Education, Kalasin University, 1(1), 304-306.
Rujirapattarasit, N. (2013). The roles of school administrator and the performances of educational resources mobilization under the secondary educational service area office 5[Master’s thesis, Silpakorn University].
Siridhrungsri, P. (2019). Resource mobilization for education. Suthiparithat Journal, 33(106), 1-16. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DPUSuthiparithatJournal/article/view/218159/151151
Supasirithananon, R. (2020). Administrator’s role and organizational climate of primary schools in Nonthaburi province[Master’s thesis, Silpakorn University].
The Secondary Educational Service Area Office Bangkok 2. (2021). Annual action plan B.E.2565. http://www.sesao2.go.th/data_16576