An Interpretive Paradigm of the Interaction Between Financial Literacy and Power Dynamics under Gender Norms: An Exploratory Multiple Case Study of the Household Black Box in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: explicate the dynamics of power and negotiation mechanisms underlying complex financial decision-making processes within the private sphere of Thai households; analyze the structural influence of gender norms as regulatory factors shaping power relations and the division of financial management roles between life partners; and propose a theoretical perspective concerning the interaction between financial literacy and normative power.
This study employed an advanced qualitative research approach. The target participants consisted of eight households (life partners) selected as case studies through a human-subject research process, in accordance with advanced qualitative research criteria emphasizing in-depth interpretation. The findings revealed that financial literacy does not influence decision-making power linearly; rather, it is mediated profoundly by symbolic power embedded in gender norms. This phenomenon gives rise to what may be termed “powerless knowledge,” in which individuals with higher levels of financial competence are denied opportunities to exercise their “voice” when that competence conflicts with traditional role expectations. Furthermore, the analysis identified three principal mechanisms operating within the “black box of the household”: (1) a concealed unilateral model, in which one partner exercises absolute authority; (2) a negotiation model under the shadow of normative constraints, where rational deliberation exists but ultimately yields to gendered dignity and expectations; and (3) a strategic partnership model characterized by informational symmetry and mutual transparency. In conclusion, the sustainable opening of the household “black box” requires dismantling irrational normative power structures and promoting financial literacy as a shared competency within life partnerships.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Banerjee, A. N., Hasan, I., Kumar, K., & Philip, D. (2021). The power of a financially literate woman in intra-household financial decision-making. SSRN Electronic Journal, 3246314. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3246314
Bank of Thailand. (2022). Results of a survey on the financial attitudes and behaviors of Thais under conditions of high household debt. Bank of Thailand. https://www.bot.or.th/th/research-and-publications/articles-and-publications/bot-magazine-issues/Phrasiam-67- 2/2567-info-financial-skill.html
Fernandes, D., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2014). Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors. Management Science, 60(8), 1861-1883. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-32290-001
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
Gupta, S., & Bhadouria, S. (2023). Women’s financial autonomy in household financial decisions: A study on rural women. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 10(7), f395-f408. http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2307547.pdf
Singh, S., & Kumar, S. (2025). Gender Dynamics in household financial decision-making: A socio-economic analysis of urban and rural households in Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh. International Journal of Law Management, 8(2), 655-672.
https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.119162
Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5-44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5
Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI). (2015). Social inequality in Thailand: Policy trends and policy approaches. TDRI. https://tdri.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Synthesis-Report-Year-2-Inclusive-Growth.pdf
National Statistical Office. (2024). The 2023 household socio-economic survey. National Statistical Office, Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2024/20240508082744_74896.pdf
Tufano, P. (2009). Consumer Finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 1(1), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.financial.050808.114457
Vogler, C., Brockmann, M., & Wiggins, R. D. (2006). Intimate relationships and changing patterns of money management at the beginning of the twenty-first century. The British journal of sociology, 57(3), 455-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00120.x
Woolley, F. (2003). Control over money in marriage. In Grossbard SA, ed. Marriage and the economy: Theory and evidence from advanced industrial societies. Cambridge University (pp. 105-128). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615863.007