The Quality Standard and Indicators for Faculty of Industrial Technology, Rajabhat University.

Authors

  • วิชัย แหวนเพชร

Keywords:

Industrial Technology, Standard, Quality

Abstract

This study aimed to 1) study the educational context of the industrial technology faculty. Rajabhat University. 2) analyze the educational operation of industrial technology faculty, 3) develop quality standards and indicators for faculty of industrial technology 4) evaluate the
faculty of industrial technology with constructed quality standards and indicators. The research results revealed that the faculty of industrial technology has taught both undergraduate, master's and doctoral degree, with both regular and evening class students, 900 staffs were
employed with civil officials was 46.89 percent and the employment staffs was 53.11 percent. The analysis of the weaknesses of the industrial technology faculty were 1) budget management was also less. 2) number of students decrease. 3) number of personnel in the
academics and support were minimal. 4) building and labs were not enough. 5) tools and equipments were old and inadequate Quality standards and indicators for faculty of Industrial Technology (QS.In-tech,2010) composed of 8 standards were : 1) students and quality graduate. 2) curriculum and instruction, 3) research and creative invention. 4) budget and facilities. 5) teachers and support personnel. 6) academic services and technology transfer. 7) management and culture. and 8) quality assurance mechanisms The ranking of compliance QS. In-tech 2010. It evaluated the faculty of industrial technology with constructed standards and indicators to 8 faculties found that 1) the faculty of industrial technology, Phetchaburi Rajabhat University certified good level ( X =4.23), 2) faculty of industrial technology, Phranakhon Rajabhat University certified good level ( X =3.98).
3) faculty of industrial technology, Rambhai Banni Rajabhat University certified good level ( X =3.92), 4) faculty of industrial technology, Buri Rum Rajabhat University certified good level ( X =3.67), 5) faculty of industrial technology. Kampeangpetch Rajabhat University certified good level ( X =3.61), 6) faculty of industrial technology, Nakon Srithamarat Rajabhat University certified good level ( X =3.59), 7) faculty of industrial technology. Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University certified good level ( X =3.59), and 8) faculty of industrial technology. Chiang Rai Rajabhat University certified good level ( X =3.59).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Janjira Wongkhomthong. (2000). A
Development of Indicators of
Educational Quality Assurance of
Private Higher Education
Institutions. Individual research
documents. Diploma, National
Defence College, The Joint State -
Private Sector.
Office of the Council of State. (2004).
Rajabhat Universities Act 2004.
Royal Thai Government Gazette
Vol.121 Special section 23 A 14
June.
Piyathida Worayanopakorn. (2003). A
Development of Composite
Indicator of Teacher
Empowerment in Schools under
Jurisdiction of the Commission
for Basic Education. Chonburi :
Piboonbumpen Demonstration
School Burapa University.
Suwimon Wongwanich. (2002). A
Development of the Standards
for Teacher and School
Administrator Quality and a
Design of the Internal Evaluation
System. Bangkok: Faculty of
Education Chulalongkorn
University.
Thongpakdee, A. (2000). A development
of composite indicator for
educaitonal quality of Faculty of
Education in Rajabhat Institutes
by group of inner staff and
group of external experts. Thesis
in master of Education
Chulalongkorn University.

Published

2019-09-04

How to Cite

แหวนเพชร ว. (2019). The Quality Standard and Indicators for Faculty of Industrial Technology, Rajabhat University. Research and Development Journal Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 8(3), 212. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/irdssru/article/view/214604