Assessment Model of Research Promotion Process for Local Development of Rajabhat Universities

Authors

  • ธิดารัตน์ สุขประภาภรณ์

Keywords:

Assessment Model, Research Promotion Process, Local Development, Rajabhat Universities

Abstract

The objectives of this research and development are 1) to study factors and indicators of research promotion process for local development of Rajabhat universities, The research populations were 40 professors of Rajabhat universities 2) to create assessment model of research promotion process for local development of Rajabhat universities with regard to the creation of assessment model, the researcher applied concepts of Nevo (Nevo, 1983), William (William R. Tash, 2006), and
SirichaiKanjanawasee 2009)and, 3) to study the efficiency of assessment model of research promotion process for local development of Rajabhat universities.The experiment of assessment was conducted by applying assessment model into one Rajabhat university. The research results can be concluded as follows: The factors and indicators of research promotion process for local development consisted of 5 factors and 50 indicators, in which the 50 indicators included 8 indicators of promotion process for research question development, 5 indicators of the
promotion process research design learning, 27 indicators of promotion process for supporting research operations, 6 indicators of promotion process for supporting the potentiality of research dissemination, and 4 indicators of promotion process for responding to local’s needs. All of these factors were able to explain the variance of variables of research promotion process for local development at the percentage of
69.66. The model of research promotion process for local development consisted of 5 main factors which are 1) assessment‘s target, 2) scope of assessment, 3) assessment operation, 4) assessment’s results judgment, and 5) report of assessment results. And regarding the search for the efficiency of assessment model of research promotion
process for local development. In four aspects, it was found that the accuracy and correctness of the model is at the highest level, and the utility, feasibility, and appropriateness of the model are at the high level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buason, R. (1997). Evaluation
Assessment Research. Bangkok,
Ton-or Grammy.
Buason, R. Research and Development.
(2000).Pitsanulok. Faculty of
education Naresuan University.
Buddhawattana, P. (2006) Innovation to
development culture of the
research for lecturlor of Songkla
university Patani campus, Faculty
of education Songkla University
Patani campus.
Chaithep, B. (2009). Factors to promote
research in the classroom of the
teacher in the school network
Singhanat-rachalai Maehongsorn
province. Master of Art Thesis
(Education administration).
Chiangmai Rajabhat University.
Chiengkul, W. (2008). Thai Education on
2007/2008 Equality issues
Thailand and the quality of
education. Bangkok. Office of
education research and
Development, Office of the
Education Council, Ministry of
Education, VTC.Comunication.
Department of Education administration,
Faculty of Education. Silpakorn
University. (2011) Form of action to
promote for development the
research on areas base office.
Bangkok, Office of the Basic Education
Commission, Ministry of Education.
Jack R. Fraenkel and Norman E. Wallen.
(1932). How to Design and Evaluate
Research in Education. (6th ed.),
McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Jitmitraparb, S. (July 13, 2011). National
Research council of Thailand (NRCT)
scholars produce research policy.
Daily news. Retrieved from
http://www.dailynews.co.th.
Johnstone, James N. (1981). Indicators of
education system. London: Unesco.
Kanjanawasee, S. (2009). Theory assessment.
4th Edition. Bangkok. Chulalongkorn
University Printed.
Kumar, Ranjit. (2005). Research
Methodology-A Step-by-Step Guide
for Beginners, (2nd.ed.), London: SAGE
Publication, Ltd.
Kundalaputra, C. (2007) The Research for
new generation researchers. Bangkok.
Sahathammic Press. Co, ltd.
Nevo, D. (1983) .The conceptualization of
Education Evaluation: An analytical
Review of the Literature. Review of
Education Research, 53 (3), 117-128.
Phithiyanuwat, S. (2008) Valuation
Methodology: The Science of
values. 4th edition Bangkok.
Chulalongkorn Univiersity Printed.
Prasertphan, S. and Jabjai,S. (2004). The
condition of the personnel
management system that facilitates
the promotion of research
professors. Uttaradit. Uttaradit
Rajabhat University.
Saptanon, J. (2009) Development of the
Research Promotion Model for
Teachers in University. Dissertation of
Ph.D. (Research and Development on
Technical Education). Graduate school.
King Mongkut's University of
Technology North Bangkok.
Seesuk, K. (2009). Research Methodology.
Chiangmai, Faculty of Education,
Chiangmai University.
Srisa-ard, B. (1992). Fundamental of
Research. 6th Edition. Bangkok.
Suviriyasarn Press.
Srisa-ard, B.. 1992. The Research for research
and evaluation. Maha Sarakham,
Srinakharinwirot University Maha
Sarakham.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1999). Foundational
Models for 21st Century Program
Evaluation. The Evaluation Center:
Western Michigan University.
Stufflebeam, D.L. (1968). Toward a Science
of Education Evaluationin Education
Technology, Boston, Allyn and bacon.
Tanya, S. (2002). Assessment of Education.
Bangkok. Suriyasarn.
Thiwaphan, S. and Thongsukdee, M.
Bhumipattrakom, P. (2005) Dream
Weaver Rajabhat University to locals.
Nakhon Sawan, Nakhon Sawan
Rajabhat University.Rimping Printed.
William R. Tash. (2006) .Evaluating Research
Centers and Institutes for Success: A
Manual and Guide with Case
Studies. WT & Associates.
Fredericksburg.
Worthen,B.R and Sanders,J.R. (1973).
Educational Evaluation: Theory and
Practice. USA: Wadswoth Publishing
Company.
Worthen,B.R and Sanders,J.R. (1973).
Educational Evaluation: Theory and
Practice. USA: Wadswoth Publishing
Company.

Published

2019-09-04

How to Cite

สุขประภาภรณ์ ธ. (2019). Assessment Model of Research Promotion Process for Local Development of Rajabhat Universities. Research and Development Journal Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 8(3), 225. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/irdssru/article/view/214605