Interesting Cases from Abroad: Fox v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder Case

Authors

  • นภนาง เอกอัคร

Keywords:

Baby Powder Case, Fox v. Johnson & Johnson, mass tort, ovarian cancer, talcum, class action

Abstract

Fox v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder Case is one of the most famous mass tort cases in relation to healthcare in 2016. In May this year, the St. Louis Court, Missouri delivered its verdict that Johnson & Johnson is liable for wrong-doing in concealing the risk of cancer caused by talcum, a type of mineral, one of its main ingredients in baby powder, the failure to warn of such risk caused a victim’s ovarian cancer and led to her death.  The damages awarded was 72 million USD (2,520 million Baht).  In the past years, the number of cases involving similar claims has risen up to 1,200 cases nationwide. Despite the accusation, the executives insisted on their scientific evidence that talcum is not harmful towards human beings. Johnson & Johnson believes that there is no medical evidence to prove that talcum is the cause of ovarian cancer.

Nowadays, it is not only the Law in the United States of America that emphasises on the healthcare industry, the law in Thailand has also greatly developed over the years especially for healthcare and consumer protection laws for instance, Consumer Protection Law Act, Drug Act, Unfair Contract Term Act etc, in response to the healthcare awareness among Thai citizens. Recently, the class action law was additionally enacted in the Civil Procedural Law in April 2015 in order to assist consumers who are the victims in the same action to prosecute their cases quickly and fairly.  Therefore, it is greatly essential for everyone in the legal and healthcare fields to pay close attention to the development and progress of such interesting cases from abroad.

Keywords: Baby Powder Case, Fox v. Johnson & Johnson, mass tort, ovarian cancer, talcum, class action 

References

สำนักกฎหมายและวิชาการสำนักงานศาลยุติธรรม, สำนักงานศาลยุติธรรม. (2558). ดุลภาพ ถามตอบกฎหมายใหม่ : การดำเนินคดีแบบกลุ่ม (Class action) มกราคม - เมษายน.

สุธินี ฤทษ์วศินกุล. (2549). ค่าทนายความตามผลแห่งคดี (contingent fee) : ข้อพิจารณาเกี่ยวกับเสรีภาพของสัญญาการคุ้มครองสังคม. บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย: มหาวิทยาลัยธุรกิจบัณฑิตย์.

อนันต์ ช่วยนึก (2555). บทความ ‘ปัญหาทางกฎหมายเกี่ยวกับการเรียกค่าตอบแทน การจ้างว่าความในการฟ้องคดีแบบกลุ่ม’ วารสารวิชาการศรีปทุม, ปีที่ 9 (2): 61-71.

พระราชบัญญัติแก้ไขเพิ่มเติมประมวลกฎหมายวิธีพิจารณาความแพ่ง (ฉบับที่ 26) พ.ศ. 2558 (2558, 8 เมษายน). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา [เล่ม 132 ตอนที่ 28 ก]

Bloomberg (2016), J&J Must Pay $72 Million Over Talc Tied to woman’s Cancer, By Tim Bross and Jef Feeley, 23 February 2016. [ออนไลน์] Available at
URL: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-23/j-j-ordered-to-pay-72-million-over-talc-tied-to-ovarian-cancer

Bloomberg Businessweek (2016), Johnson & Johnson Has a Baby Powder Problem, By Susan Berfield, Jef Feeley and Margaret Cronin Fisk, 31 March 2016. [ออนไลน์] Available at
URL: http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-baby-powder-cancer-lawsuits/

Drugwatch (2016), Current Litigation & Lawsuit News, ‘Jury Order J&J to Pay $72M in Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Case, By Michelle Llamas, 24 February 2016. [ออนไลน์] Available at URL: https://www.drugwatch.com/2016/02/24/jj-to-pay-72m-in-ovarian-cancer-talcum-powder-case/

Reuters (2016), J&J must pay $72 million for cancer death linked to talcum powder: By Jonathan Stempel, 25 February 2016 [ออนไลน์] Available at
URL: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-johnson-johnson-verdict-idUSKCN0VW20A

St. Louis Post-Dispatch (2016), St. Louis jury orders Johnson & Johnson to pay $72 million in talcum powder cancer case, By Kim Bell, 23 February 2016
[ออนไลน์] Available at URL: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/st-louis-jury-orders-johnson-johnson-to-pay-million-in/article_26e6046c-f97d-5a6d-a879-a97535dd78bc.html

The New York Time (2016), Lawsuits Over Baby Powder Raise Questions About Cancer Risk By Roni Caryn Rabin, 23 May, 2016. [ออนไลน์] Available at
URL: http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/05/23/lawsuits-over-baby-powder-raise-questions-about-cancer-risk/?_r=2

Downloads

Published

2015-01-11

How to Cite

เอกอัคร น. (2015). Interesting Cases from Abroad: Fox v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder Case. Public Health Policy and Laws Journal, 2(3), 367–380. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal_law/article/view/162533

Issue

Section

Academic Article / Perspectives