Government as Enemy: A Discourse Analysis Approach in Social Media and Newspaper Articles Regarding E-Cigarette Control
Keywords:
Discourse social media e-cigaretteAbstract
This article received support from Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center in 2018. E-cigarette, despite its illegality and subjected to total ban in Thailand, is popular among Thai smokers. Since e-cig is illegal, several attempts were done to influence the control policies, one of the attempt is through online communications. Sets of discourse on e-cigarette safety have been constructed and communicated through e-cigarette vendors and supporters to promote consumption and divert social belief on e-cig. One of the key discourse on e-cig safety is targeting the government and the control policies as enemy, analyses include 4 sets of communications 1) government sectors are enemies against the promotion and use of e-cig 2) discrediting government sectors which prohibit e-cigarette as slow and unopened to updated information 3) use testimonial, referring credited people, celebrities, countries and organizations to support e-cigarette safety and using them as the opposite voices 4) referring to the government as anarchy and dictatorship,halting all development including e-cig promotion. The end result showed a widespread of online myth on e-cigarette safety.
References
ไชยรัตน์ เจริญสินโอฬาร. (2560). วาทกรรมการพัฒนา: อำนาจความรู้ ความจริง เอกลักษณ์ และความเป็นอื่น. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์วิภาษา.
วรกิจ คาโดซาว่า. ควันจากน้ำ: ทัศนคติและการบริโภคเชิงสัญลักษณ์ของผู้บริโภคต่อบุหรี่ไฟฟ้า, การค้นคว้าอิสระ, คณะพาณิชยศาสตร์และการบัญชี มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, 2559.
AJM Sykes. 1970. "Myth in communication". Journal of Communication Studies 20 (1), pp. 17-31.
Cole-Lewis, Pugatch, Sanders, Varghese, Posada, Yun, Schwarz, Augustson. 2015. "Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter". Journal of Medical Internet Research 17(10).
Foucault. (1982). The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language. USA; Vintage.
Harris JK, Moreland-Russell S, Choucair B, Mansour R, Staub M, Simmons K. 2014. "Tweeting for and against public health policy: response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's electronic cigarette Twitter campaign". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 16(10): e238.
Huang J, Kornfield R, Szczypka G, Emery SL. "A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter". 2014. Tobacco Control. Jul 23 Suppl 3:iii26–30.
Klein EG, Berman M, Hemmerich N, Carlson C, Htut S, Slater M. 2016. "Online e-cigarette marketing claims: A systematic content and legal analysis". Tobacco Regulatory Science. 2(3): 252–262.
Levy DT, Cummings KM, Villanti AC, Niaura R, Abrams DB, Fong GT, Borland R. 2017. "A framework for evaluating the public health impact of e-cigarettes and other vaporized nicotine products" Addiction 112(1):8-17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Disclaimer and Copyright Notice
The content and information presented in articles published in the Journal of Law and Public Health Policy represent the opinions and sole responsibility of the respective authors. The editorial board does not necessarily agree with or assume any responsibility for the views expressed.
All articles, data, content, images, and other materials published in the Journal of Law and Public Health Policy are the intellectual property of the journal. Any individual or organization wishing to reproduce, distribute, or otherwise use the entirety or any part of such materials must provide proper citation.