Government as Enemy: A Discourse Analysis Approach in Social Media and Newspaper Articles Regarding E-Cigarette Control

Authors

  • Sirach Lapyai Dr.

Keywords:

Discourse social media e-cigarette

Abstract

This article received support from Tobacco Control Research and Knowledge Management Center in 2018. E-cigarette, despite its illegality and subjected to total ban in Thailand, is popular among Thai smokers. Since e-cig is illegal, several attempts were done to influence the control policies, one of the attempt is through online communications. Sets of discourse on e-cigarette safety have been constructed and communicated through e-cigarette vendors and supporters to promote consumption and divert social belief on e-cig. One of the key discourse on e-cig safety is targeting the government and the control policies as enemy, analyses include 4 sets of communications 1) government sectors are enemies against the promotion and use of e-cig 2) discrediting government sectors which prohibit e-cigarette as slow and unopened to updated information 3) use testimonial, referring credited people, celebrities, countries and organizations to support e-cigarette safety and using them as the opposite voices 4) referring to the government as anarchy and dictatorship,halting all development including e-cig promotion. The end result showed a widespread of online myth on e-cigarette safety.

References

โครงการศึกษาผลกระทบของบุหรี่ไฟฟ้าที่มีต่อผู้มีส่วนได้ส่วนเสียในประเทศไทยและข้อเสนอแนะในการบริหารจัดการจากภาครัฐ, รายงานการวิจัย, กรุงเทพมหานคร: โรงงานยาสูบ, 2557.

ไชยรัตน์ เจริญสินโอฬาร. (2560). วาทกรรมการพัฒนา: อำนาจความรู้ ความจริง เอกลักษณ์ และความเป็นอื่น. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์วิภาษา.

วรกิจ คาโดซาว่า. ควันจากน้ำ: ทัศนคติและการบริโภคเชิงสัญลักษณ์ของผู้บริโภคต่อบุหรี่ไฟฟ้า, การค้นคว้าอิสระ, คณะพาณิชยศาสตร์และการบัญชี มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์, 2559.

AJM Sykes. 1970. "Myth in communication". Journal of Communication Studies 20 (1), pp. 17-31.

Cole-Lewis, Pugatch, Sanders, Varghese, Posada, Yun, Schwarz, Augustson. 2015. "Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter". Journal of Medical Internet Research 17(10).

Foucault. (1982). The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language. USA; Vintage.

Harris JK, Moreland-Russell S, Choucair B, Mansour R, Staub M, Simmons K. 2014. "Tweeting for and against public health policy: response to the Chicago Department of Public Health's electronic cigarette Twitter campaign". Journal of Medical Internet Research. 16(10): e238.

Huang J, Kornfield R, Szczypka G, Emery SL. "A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter". 2014. Tobacco Control. Jul 23 Suppl 3:iii26–30.

Klein EG, Berman M, Hemmerich N, Carlson C, Htut S, Slater M. 2016. "Online e-cigarette marketing claims: A systematic content and legal analysis". Tobacco Regulatory Science. 2(3): 252–262.

Levy DT, Cummings KM, Villanti AC, Niaura R, Abrams DB, Fong GT, Borland R. 2017. "A framework for evaluating the public health impact of e-cigarettes and other vaporized nicotine products" Addiction 112(1):8-17.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-08

How to Cite

Lapyai, S. (2020). Government as Enemy: A Discourse Analysis Approach in Social Media and Newspaper Articles Regarding E-Cigarette Control. Public Health Policy and Laws Journal, 6(1), 201–210. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal_law/article/view/230125

Issue

Section

Academic Article / Perspectives