School administrative strategies for student development according to National Educational Standard for Secondary Schools under Office of Basic Education Commission
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this research is to develop educational institution administration strategy to develop students in accordance with national educational standard for secondary schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. The research is divided into three steps. Step 1 is the study of the conditions and needs of educational institution administration. The sample group consists of 389 educational administrators and academic leaders, selected through a multistage random sampling technique. The tool used is a questionnaire. Statistics used are means and standard deviations. Step 2 is the Analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in educational institution administration. Use the sample group from Step 1 to analyze the PNI Modified index and classify the internal and external environments by applying content analysis technique. Step 3 is the development of educational institution administration strategies to develop students in accordance with national educational standards for secondary schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission, which consists of two activities. The first activity is strategy review, conducted by 20 experts selected through purposive sampling. The tool is an assessment form of the appropriateness and feasibility of strategies. Data are analyzed using content analysis technique along with mean and standard deviation. The second activity is strategy evaluation using focus group discussion technique. The informants are 13 experts selected through purposive sampling. The tools used is focus-group discussion record form. Data are analyzed using content analysis technique.
The findings from the research can be summarized as follows. 1) Regarding the actual conditions, all items are found to be at a high level, while the desired conditions are at high to very high levels. 2) The internal environment is identified as a strength, and the external environment as an opportunity. 3) The results of strategy development are as follows: 3.1) Both suitability and feasibility are found to be at high to very high levels. 3.2) The developed strategies consist of 5 primary strategies and 17 secondary strategies.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ahmad, H., Agus, D., Siti Aniqoh, S., Putri H. M. A., & Winda Rahma, S. (2022). School principal leadership strategies in improving academic quality in high schools. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 48-53.
Boasri, K., & Promsut, W. (2017). A Development of results based management model to educational management quality at Bankuansra School under Suratthani Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. Journal of Social Science and Cultural, 1(1), 1-7. (in Thai)
Boontonot, S., & Chaowachai, S. (2021). The needs and guidelines to promotion of academic administration towards excellence in secondary school under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Phichit. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 7(3), 252-274.
https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRKSA/article/view/252932/171687 (in Thai)
Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2022). PISA 2022 assessment results for Thailand. PISA Thailand. https://pisathailand.ipst.ac.th/news-21/ (in Thai)
Koontz, H., & Weihrich, H. (1990). Essentials of management. Mc Graw – Hill.
Kotchasit, S., Sereerat, B., Arunwong, R., Pichayakul, T., Nilnopkoon, P., Phanthalert, C., Panomwan Na Ayuthaya, S., Borirasontikul, K., Panyatip, D., & Chitrangsan, N. (2020). Ways of leading the national education standard to practice. Journal of Graduate Studies Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University, 13(3), 192-203. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JournalGradVRU/article/view/230194/156707 (in Thai)
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. (2021). Educational administration: Concepts and practices. Sage.
Manokarn, M., & Pronwieng. S. (2021). Guidelines for setting educational standards for pilot schools in Chiang Mai education sandbox. Journal of Education Research, 16(2), 151-163. https://ejournals.swu.ac.th/index.php/jre/article/view/14178 (in Thai)
Nasompong, K., Chaopankrang., S., & Ngamkham, K. (2023). The development of the management model of an organization towards the excellence for the Faculty of Industrial Education, Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi. RMUTSB Academic Journal (Humanities and Social Sciences), 8(1), 125-135. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rmutsb-hs/article/view/261840/178565 (in Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2016). Strategic plan of office of the education council. Prigwan Graphic. (in Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2018). Education in Thailand. Office of the Education Council Ministry of Education Kingdom of Thailand. (in Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2019). National Educational Standard B.C. 2561. 21 Century. (in Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2021a). Report on the results of driving national education standards into practice for the year 2021. Office of the Education Council Ministry of Education Kingdom of Thailand. (in Thai)
Office of the Education Council. (2021b). The proposed policy for development of quality education System. Office of the Education Council Ministry of Education Kingdom of Thailand. (in Thai)
Panphong, K., & Tengsuwan, P. (2021). Nudge theory and learner outcomes according to national education standards. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 9(6), 2690-2730. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal-peace/article/view/253327/170712 (in Thai)
Pata, C., & Kaewfoo, A. (2023). congruence between the student identity and desired outcomes of education, following the national educational standards (B.E. 2561) of The Secondary Educational Service Area Office Chiang Mai. Educational Administration and Innovation Journal, 3(2), 32-42. https://so12.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EAI/article/view/758/960 (in Thai)
Phetchabun, S., Pupat, P., & Wongsirasawat, C. (2019). Administrator role indicators for encourage efficiency on learning management in school: Confirmatory factor analysis. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 10(4), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjss-2019-0058 (in Thai)
Phuangsomjit, C., Ritjaroon, P., Urwongse, K., Chongcharoen, K., Utoomporn, N., & Yawichai Jaruesil, T. (2023). The research of follow-up and assessment of learner characteristics according to the desirable outcomes of national education standards. STOU Education Journal, 16(2), 188-204. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edjour_stou/article/view/265391 (in Thai)
Phuttakawee, W., & Jasuwan, S. (2022). School development under the Office of Suphanburi Primary Educational Service Area 3 Office according to National Education Standard 2018. Journal of Education, Mahasarakham University, 16(1), 189-203. https://so09.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JOEMSU/article/view/930/2339 (in Thai)
Puttikul, C., Ruamchomrat, P., & Pumklom, M. (2022). Relationship between academic administration of school administrators and educational standards of the Schools under Kanchanaburi Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Journal of Graduate School, Pitchayatat, 17(1), 157-167. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Pitchayatat/article/view/253003 (in Thai)
Sangprateeptong, V., Pinyopanuwat. R., Ratanaphan. J., Kanjanasuwan, S., & Suttiwan Tuntirojanawong, S. (2022). A measurement and evaluation model in educational institutes to support learners in achieving desired educational outcomes based on the 2018 National Education Standards. STOU Education Journal, 15(1), 202-216. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edjour_stou/article/view/257787 (in Thai)
Suyasueb, U., Somsathan, P., & Buacharoen, P. (2023). The study of academic administration in learner development/educational standard of Kaenoisuksa School Chiangdao Chiang Mai. Journal of Graduate Studies Review MCU Phrae, 9(1), 181-194. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jgrp/article/view/1643 (in Thai)
Tangwancharoen, S., & Rungwachira, O. (2021). Guidelines for educational management towards the goals of Thailand’s National Education Standards. Journal of UBRU Educational Review, 1(1), 77-96. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JER/article/view/250488/169792 (in Thai)
Thompson, J. L., Scott, J. M., & Martin, F. (2014) Strategic management awareness and change. Cengage.
Wheelen, T., & Hunger, D.(2008). Strategic management & business policy. Addison-Wesley.
Wongsirasawat, C., Pupat, P., & Bhawangkanantha, T. (2021). The development of cooperation model for protection and care for students under the Thailand Office of the Basic Education Commission. Revista Espacios, 42(13), 45-55.
