Tourist Capacity and Valuing Recreation of Naka Cave, Phu Langka National Park

Main Article Content

Pornpimon Saengchat
Sakkarin Nonthapot

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to: 1) examine the capacity to accommodate tourists of Naka Cave, Phu Langka Natiponal Park, and 2) evaluate its recreational use value of Naka Cave, Phu Langka National Park. A mixed-methods approach was employed, using a concurrent parallel design. Data collection included in-depth interviews with 14 key informants to analyze the capacity to accommodate tourists and questionnaires distributed to 420 respondents to evaluate recreational use value using the Poisson Regression Model. Questionnaires were distributed and collected directly by the researcher. The findings revealed that: 1) The physical capacity to accommodate tourists for recreational activities was 118 people per round, with a total capacity of 944 people per day, divided into eight rounds. However, challenges were identified, including an insufficient number of bathrooms due to restrictions on permanent construction within the park area, and travel obstacles requiring visitors to walk and navigate stairs, natural paths, and rope-supported sections. 2) Most Thai tourists visited due to their belief in the Nagas. The recreational use value in 2022 was estimated at a consumer surplus of 5,758 THB per person per round, generating a total annual value of 1,346,220,400 THB from 233,800 Thai tourists. Based on these findings, the study recommends that the government: 1) implement policies to regulate and limit the number of tourists to a maximum of 944 per day, divided into eight rounds, with each group spending no more than 15 minutes in the area and clearly defined starting times for walking; 2) introduce additional fees in certain areas to support the restoration and conservation of natural resources. This should include enhancing accessibility for the elderly and promoting belief-based tourism routes to connect nearby areas.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

Aphihirantrakun, C. (2021). Tourism Attraction Carrying Capacity Assessment in Mae Ngao National Park, Mae Hong Son Province. Research and Development Journal, Loei Rajabhat University, 17(59), 41-51, (in Thai). https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/researchjournal-lru/.

Bank of Ayudhya. (2021). Tourism and hotel business after COVID-19, (in Thai). https://www.krungsri.com/th/research/research-intelligence/ri-future-of-tourism-21.

Bunta, J., Suksaard, S. & Huamueangkaew, W. (2012). Recreational value of Erawan National Park. Kanchanaburi Province. Forestry Journal, 31(2), 72-83, (in Thai). https://kukrdb.lib.ku.ac.th/journal/JFOR/search_detail/result/50715

Cowen, T. (2007). Public goods. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_good_(economics).

Department of National Parks Wildlife and Plant Conservation. (2021). Statistic for National Parks Wildlife and Plant, (in Thai). http://park.dnp.go.th/visitor/indexstatistics.php.

Ewasakul, N. (2010). Recreational valuation and carrying capacity: a case study of bangsaen beach, chonburi. http://www.thaithesis.org/detail.php?Id=1202548000638.

Inchai, M., Kungwon, S., Ngamsomsuke, W., & Tantranont, N. (2017). Valuation of Recreational Benefits of Natural Tourism Sites : A Case Study of the Decline in Quality of Tourism Si. Journal of Economics Chiang Mai University, 21(1), 31-52. (in Thai). https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJE/article/view/76497.

Jantarawimin, N. (2010). an evaluation of recreation benefits : soi phranang discovery learning library ratchathewi district bangkok. (in Thai). http://thesis.swu.ac.th/swuthesis/Hum_Res_Econ/Noppamon_J.pdf.

Katsakarn, R., Charungsutjaritkul, W., Jarapong, K. & Chumtongdo, S. (2022). Economic valuation of tourism at wat chedi, sichon district nakhon si thammarat province. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 9(7), 119-134. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMND/article/view/262563/174537.

Kitsanarom, N. & Nakaray., P. (2021). The Development in Community Based-tourism to the suitable with the Behavior andNeed of the Tourism in Noppitham, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. Nagabutr Journal Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, 13(1), 128-140, (in Thai). http://dspace.nstru.ac.th:8080/dspace/handle/123456789/2442?mode=full.

Lindsay, J. J. (1986). Carrying capacity for tourism development in national parks of the United States. Ind. Environ, 9(1), 17–20.

Mathayomburut, W. (2019). Structure of Tourism System. Journal of Thai Hospitality and Tourism, 14(1), 94-102, (in Thai). http://www.Tourismtaat.siam.edu/images/magazine/m14b1/07.taat.pdf.

Mathieson, A. & Wall, G. (1982). Tourism: Economic, physical, and social impacts. London, New York: Longman.

Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and Evaluation in Education and-Psychology: Integrating diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (pp.2 & 88-189). Thousand Oaks, London, Sage press.

Nonthapot, S. & Sirimat, S. (2020). The risk factors affecting people after the border conflict between thailand and cambodia at the baan phum sarol village, kantharalak district, sisaket province, thailand. Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(10), 780-792. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348804774_THE_RISK_FACTORS_AFFECTING_PEOPLE_AFTER_THE_BORDER_CONFLICT_BETWEEN_THAILAND_AND_CAMBODIA_AT_THE_BAAN_PHUM_SAROL_VILLAGE_KANTHARALAK_DISTRICT_SISAKET_PROVINCE_THAILAND_PJAEE_17_10_2020_780_THE_RISK_FA.

Phewmau, K. (2012). Recreational Valuation of the Coral Diving Activities at Mu Kho Similan NationalPark, Phang-nga Province, (in Thai). https://archive.lib.cmu.ac.th/full/T/2555/econ41055kp_abs.pdf.

Phongsakornrangsin, P., Empan, D. & Arunpraparat, W. (2019). Determination of tourism carrying capacity of enhancing tourism destination management standard at Mu Koh Lanta, Krabi Province. (in Thai). https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:172017.

Phumsathan, S., Nisaiharn, J. & Songsaeng, N. (2021). Physical carrying capacity and recreational use level at than bok khorani national park, krabi province. Journal of Environmental Management, 15(2). 6-25. (in Thai). https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JEM/article/view/218010.

Rasri, S. (2015). Information technology in human resource management at the zoological park organization, bangkok, thailand. (in Thai). http://ethesisarchive.library.tu.ac.th/thesis/2015/TU_2015_5703010339_3789_3270.pdf.

Ratchatawetkol, W. (2013). Using information technology with human resource management. Case study: Zoo organization. (in Thai). https://repository.nida.ac.th/server/api/core/bitstreams/fd71ae81-81be-4794-86b5-4ebda5945de8/content.

Sripaoraya, M. & Rungklin, D. (2020). Assessing the recreational value of coral resources in Ang Thong National Marine Park. Journal of Management Science, 7(1), (in Thai). 175-201. https ://so03.tcithaijo.org/I ndex.php/msj/article/download/133084/165004.

Sritrakul, W. (2021). Ai Khai Wat Chedi Phenomenon” Behavior, Beliefs and Rituals. (in Thai). https://archive.cm.mahidol.Ac.th/handle/123456789/4283.

Sukiam, K. & Suthipisan, S. (2021). A guideline for effecttive conservation and development of phra nakhon khiri park (khao wang). Journal of Liberal Arts and Management Science Kasetsart University, 8(1). 83-93. (in Thai). https://kuojs.lib.ku.ac.th/index.php/jfam/article/view/4976.

Texas Parks and Wildlife. (2018). Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan. Austin: TPWD.

Thareesang, K. & Thaweewat, P. (2017). The Evaluation of Recreational Use Value of Si Racha Seaside Public Park. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 4(1), 25-33. (in Thai). https://kukrdb.lib.ku.ac.th/journal/JEMS/search_detail/result/20001373.

Thairath Online. (2021). Do you believe in the story of the Naga, "Naga Cave", a legend told of the power of faith for travelers in the Mu line, (in Thai). https://www.thairath.co.th/news/society/2237538.

Thampitak, K. & Anthong, A. (2011). An Evaluation of Recreational Benefits of Nong Leng Sai Wetland. CMU Journal ECON, 15(2), 70-89. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJE/article/view/61233.

Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L. & Lenz, E. R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research, New York: Springer. 3.

Wongpakdee, B. (2009). Capacity to support recreational use of Khao Chamao-Khao Wong National Park. Kasetsart University:Bangkok. https://doi.nrct.go.th/ListDoi/listDetail?Resolve_DOI=10.14457/KU.the.2009.714.

Wongmahadlek, P., Kittiprasan, K., Trumikaborworn, K., & Rungwawang, K. (2019). An Applied Recreational Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) and Carrying Capacity Assessment for Tourism Destination Management: A Case of Kood Island. NAJUA: Architecture, Design and Built Environment, 34(1), 1-20. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NAJUA-Arch/article/view/190393/145468.