Comparison of Satisfaction between Online and On-site Teaching Management of Undergraduate Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were to: 1) study the level of satisfaction between online and on-site teaching management of undergraduate students; and 2) compare the satisfaction of with online and on-site teaching management of undergraduate students according to the composition of teaching and learning. There were 4 areas: teaching, teaching and learning, teaching materials, and measurement and evaluation. The sample consisted of 387 undergraduate students from year 1-4 at Suratthani Rajabhat University who studied in the second semester of the academic year 2022, selected through multi-stage random sampling. The instrument of data collection was a questionnaire on satisfaction with online and on-site teaching methods using a 5-level Likert rating scales. Data were analyzed using arithmetic (𝑥̅), standard deviation (S.D.), mean difference testing, and t-test. The findings were that 1) students have a high level of satisfaction of both online and on-site teaching, both overall and in specific aspects. 2) Students were more satisfied with online instructions than on-site instructions with the statistical significance at 0.05. Therefore, teachers should be aware of student satisfaction in teaching managements including the development of teachers in terms of personality, creating a positive atmosphere and providing opportunities for participation, using modern and creative teaching methods and technological media, and implementing diverse and fair measurement and evaluation methods.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Aksornkan, S. (2020). Study of Environment and Needs in Learning Management Thai language for Higher Education. Suratthani Rajabhat University. (in Thai).
Barnard, R. & Campbell L. (2005). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of process writing: The scaffolding of learning in a university context. The TESOLANZ Journal, 13, 76-88. https://www.tesolanz.org.nz/wpcontent/uploads/2020/01/TESOLANZ_Journal_Vol13_2005.pdf
Boonmee, W. (2021). Teaching Materials and Learning in the 21st Century. Journal of Legal Entity Management and Local Innovation, 7(9), 373-386. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsa-journal/article/view/249502/172565 (in Thai)
Boonsun, S. (2011). The Satisfactions of Students with the Learning and Teaching of Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University in
Ayutthaya Province. (in Thai). Master’s degree thesis in master of arts Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University. Bangkok.
Chanchai, S. (2014). Instructional design and development. Phetkasem Printing Group Co., Ltd, Thailand, 160, (in Thai).
Duangsri, P. (2012). Teachers and personality development. http://sites.google.com/site/krukruthai/bthkhwam-phasa-thiy/khrukabkarphathnabukhlikphaph (in Thai)
Herzberg, F. (1965). The Motivation to Work, John Wiley and Sons, 16.
Khammanee, T. (2021). Teaching : Knowledge for organizing an effective learning process. Chulalongkorn University Press, Thailand, 43 (in Thai).
Khetchatturat, J. & Punturat, S. (2016). Development of Graduate Students’ Statistical Competency in Research via Application of Research-Based Learning. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University, 39(2), 87-96. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EDKKUJ/article/view/74780 (in Thai)
Khongmhor, P. (2017). The guiding paradigm in online classroom development for RMUTT lecturer. Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Thailand. (in Thai).
Kotler, P. (2006). Marketing Management the millenium Edition. Prentice-Hall Inc, 160
Malithong, K. (2001). Educational technology and innovation. Chulalongkorn University, Thailand, 160, (in Thai).
Maoon, R. (2016). Effective management of teaching and learning at the higher education level. Journal of Southern Technology.9 (2), 169-176. (in Thai)
Meeraka, P. (2017). Teacher's Charecteristic of 21st Century. MBU Education Journal, 5(2), 23-35. http://ojs.mbu.ac.th/index.php/edj/article/view/152 (in Thai)
Nammuang, C. (2017). Teacher Personality and Good Teaching Characteristics. Journal of SaengKhomKham Buddhist Studies, 2(1), 55-64. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsbs/article/view/242569 (in Thai)
Newstrom, J. W. & Davis, K. (1997). Orgazation behavior: Human behavior at work. Allyn and Bacon, 83.
Phinasa, A. (2021). OBEC and educational management under the COVID situation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtgUYj4plWE (in Thai)
Sansupa, K., Kongkranphan, U., Sucaromana, U. & Nantasen, P. (2020). The Adjustment of Undergraduate Student in Pandemic Covid-19. Journal of MCU Humanities Review, 6(2), 83-97. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/human/article/view/246886 (in Thai)
Shell, M.W. (1975). Responding to social Change. Dowden Hutchison Press, 252-268.
Thepwichit, A. (2009). Moodle training manual for system manager levels. The Center for Educational Innovation Technology Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand, 11, (in Thai).
Srisa-ard, B. (2017). Basic Research. New and Improved edition. Suviriyasan company, Thailand, 121, (in Thai).
Vichaiyut Hospital. (2021). Too much stress can affect the body, (in Thai). https://www.vichaiyut.com/th/health/informations/stress-not-good-for-health/
Woodman, R. W. (1995). Organizational Behavior, West Publishing Company, 152-154.
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics, An Introductory Analysis, Harper and Row, 727-728.
