Admissible Evidences in Court against Age of Child Trafficking in Court

ผู้แต่ง

  • Budsara Girdwichai Prueksamas

คำสำคัญ:

admissible evidences, age of child trafficking, liability presumption

บทคัดย่อ

Human trafficking challenges the world community to find efficient and practical solutions in fighting this serious crime against humanity, especially among children. In practice, it is difficult for a state to prove a child victim‖s age beyond reasonable doubt. Moreover, the defendant can defend exemption against aCriminal Liability Rule.Consequently, some trafficked children are not protected and remedied by law. This study aims to examine problems related to the admissible evidences about the age of child trafficking in Thai courts. It also gathers findings and key points from a review of significant parts of available literature associated with admissible evidences about the age of child trafficking in Thai courts. This review sets out to identify and evaluate relevant legislations in national and international research and initiatives related to analyze the effective use of admissible evidences about the age of child trafficking in courts regarding criminal justice system, the legal rules as to judge role, what evidences are admissible in courts, liability presumption, and the age of child victim‖s situation in substantive laws. Findings of this study will depend upon situations on the age of child trafficking in substantive laws, and liability presumption to support evidence about the age of child trafficking in courts.

References

Thai Books
Anti-Human Trafficking Acts B.E 2551. (2008). Government Gazette 6 February 2551, Book 125 Episode 34 125 A. Jaiharn, N. (1997). Mistake of Exemption from Criminal Liability. Master Degree Thesis. Faculty of
Law: Thammasat University
Na Nakorn, K. (1997). The Criminal Procedure: Principles of Irrelevant Laws and Practices.
Bangkok: Pimaksorn publishing.
Tingsapat, J. (2543). Criminal Code Explanation Part 2 Section . Bangkok: Thai Bar.
English Books
Bonnie, R.J. et al. (2004). Criminal Law, Second Edition. New York: Foundation Press, p. 192 Connerton.(1997).The Resurgence of the Marital Rape Exception.Albany Law Review.
1997(Vol. 61), p.252.
J. F. Stephen. (1950). A Digest of the Criminal Law 212 (L. F. Sturge 9th ed. 1950).
Leslie J. Harris. (1986). Constitutional Limits on Criminal Presumptions as an Expression of
Changing Concepts of Fundamental Fairness. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.
Volume 77. Issue 2, p.310.
Mendonca, D(1998). Presumptions. Ratio Juris. 1998 Vol.11 No.4, pp.399-412.
M Oberman (1996) R Delgado. Statutory Rape Laws. ABA Journal. :August 1996. Volume 82,
pp. 86-87. Model Penal Code § 213.6(1)
Shelton C. Williams, 1964, Montana Law Review. Fall 1964. Volume 26 Issue 1, pp.162-142. Washington and Lee Law Review. (1964). Volume 22 Issue 1, pp.119-125.

Downloads

เผยแพร่แล้ว

01.01.2022