กลยุทธ์การพัฒนาภาวะผู้นำของผู้บริหารสถานศึกษาในศตวรรษที่ 21 Leadership Development Strategy of School Administrators in the 21st Century

Abstract

The purposes of this research were 1) to examine the environment context and approaches to the development of school administrators leadership in the 21^st century 2) to establish a strategies for the development of school administrators leadership in the 21^st century. The sample of this research consisted of 129 secondary school administrators under The Office of the Basic Education Commission. Statistics employed for data analyses were percentages, arithmetic mean, and standard deviation. The environment contexts and approaches to the development were using the SWOT analysis and content analysis. The strategies formulated with the SWOT matrix. The focus group discussion was organized among 9 experts to confirm the propriety standard of the strategies.     

The finding of the research were as follows:                       

1. The leadership of school administrators in the 21^st century as a whole was at the highest level. Ethical and moral  aspects with the highest average, followed by cooperation skills, technology and communication, creativity and vision.The SWOT analysis indicated that as for the internal contexts affecting School administrators have knowledge and skills in the use of technology was the most strengthening variables but lacked the knowledge and skills to use the english language were weakening variables. As for the external contexts, the community and local leaders take part in improving the quality of education was the supporting variable and political interference with educational policy was the threat variable. The approach to developing the leadership of the school administrators is that the school administrators use technology and develop innovation for management. Collaborate with the community to develop the school. Behave as a good school administrator.

2.The leadership development strategy of school administrators in the 21^st century consists of 5 strategies, 11 sub-strategies, 59 measures and 51 indicators, which is the most propriety level.