ผลการจัดการเรียนรู้ด้วยโมเดลซิปปาร่วมกับผังกราฟิกที่มีต่อความสามารถ ในการคิดวิเคราะห์และผลสัมฤทธิ์ทางการเรียนวิชาสังคมศึกษา ศาสนา และวัฒนธรรม ของนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 3 The Effects of Learning Management by CIPPA Model with Graphic Organizer on the Analytical Thinking Ability and Learning Achievement in Social Studies, Religion and Culture of Matthayomsuksa 3 Students

Abstract

The purposes of this research were 1) to compare the analytical thinking ability of Mathayomsuksa 3 students learning management by CIPPA model with graphic organizer with the criteria at 75%, 2) to compare the learning achievement of Mathayomsuksa 3 students before and after learning management by CIPPA model with graphic organizer and 3) to compare the learning achievement of Mathayomsuksa 3 students after learning management by CIPPA model with graphic organizer with the criteria at 75%. The samples consisted of 39 Mathayomsuksa 3/1 students of Banraiwittaya School. They were obtained by using Multi-stage Sampling. Research instruments included 1) lesson plan are satisfied at the most appropriate quality () 2) analytical thinking ability test which is a subjective model of 20 items, with degree of difficulty between 0.28-0.69, the discrimination between 0.22-0.78 and reliability of 0.89 and 3) achievement test which is a subjective model of 30 items, with degree of difficulty between 0.31-0.78, the discrimination between 0.28-0.72 and reliability of 0.92. Statistics used for data analysis, t-test dependent sample, and t-test one sample.

The research findings were as follows:

1. The analytical thinking ability of Mathayomsuksa 3 students after learning had 80.15 percentage score of total scores. Which was higher than the criteria at 75% at the .05 level of significance.


2. The post-test mean score of Mathayomsuksa 3 students after learning () which was higher than the pre-test mean score () at the .05 level of significance.


3. The post-test mean score of Mathayomsuksa 3 students after learning had 80.87 percentage score of total scores. Which was higher than the criteria at 75% at the .05 level of significance.