Enhancing University Students’ Understanding of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through Participatory Learning with the Connectivity Logistics Activity

Main Article Content

Matee Vicheansan
Wanwisa Duantrakoonsil
Sajee Pattanafuengfo
Patiphat Keesoon
Maneerat Thongsamut

Abstract

         This objectives of this research were to: 1) examine the level of students’ understanding of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) before and after participating in the “The Connectivity Logistics” activity, 2) analyze the effects of the activity on enhancing SDG-related understanding through participatory learning, and 3) explore students’ opinions regarding the effectiveness of the activity in promoting the SDGs. The sample group consisted of 100 undergraduate students from the College of Logistics and Supply Chain, Sripatum University, across three campuses: Bangkok, Chonburi, and Khon Kaen. The research employed a mixed-methods approach, including quantitative data collection via a 10-item SDG comprehension questionnaire (pre-test and post-test), a 15-item opinion survey on the activity, and qualitative data from in-depth interviews with seven students.


        The findings revealed the level of understanding of students of the SDGs, with mean scores increasing from 6.23 before the activity to 8.12 after the activity (out of 10). The evaluation of student opinions indicated high levels of satisfaction across all dimensions (mean scores ranging from 4.06 to 4.35 out of 5), particularly in experiential learning in community settings. In-depth interviews confirmed the activity’s role in inspiring students, raising awareness, and empowering them to contribute to sustainable societal development. The results align with Kolb (1984) theory of experiential learning, which emphasizes hands-on practice, reflection, and cognitive processing to enhance understanding. This approach bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Moreover, the activity was designed in accordance with the SDG framework, which promotes integrated environmental, social, and economic dimensions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vicheansan, M. . ., Duantrakoonsil, W. . ., Pattanafuengfo, S. ., Keesoon, P. . ., & Thongsamut, M. . (2025). Enhancing University Students’ Understanding of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through Participatory Learning with the Connectivity Logistics Activity. SOCIAL SCIENCES RESEARCH AND ACADEMIC JOURNAL, 20(2), 187–202. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSSRA/article/view/280459
Section
Research Articles

References

Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., and Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416-430.

Blanco-Portela, N., Benayas, J., Pertierra, L. R., and Lozano, R. (2018). How to incorporate sustainability into higher education curricula: A case study from a Spanish university. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3847-3860.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.

De Sousa, L. O. (2021). Learning Experiences of a Participatory Approach to Educating for Sustainable Development in a South African Higher Education Institution Yielding Social Learning Indicators. Sustainability, 13(6), 3210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063210

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Hallinger, P., and Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998-2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401.

Kioupi, V., and Voulvoulis, N. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A systemic framework for connecting the SDGs to educational outcomes. Sustainability, 12(8), 3366.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Veiga Ávila, L., Londero Brandli, L., Molthan-Hill, P., Pace, P., Azeiteiro, U., and Ruiz Vargas, V. (2021). Implementing sustainable development in higher education institutions: An overview. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(2), 245-264.

O’Brien, K., and Sygna, L. (2013). Responding to climate change: The three spheres of transformation. Environmental Sustainability, 5(1), 56-64.

Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation. (2023). Higher Education Development Plan for Sustainability, 2023–2027. Bangkok: Author.

Osanai, S., and Yu, J. (2023). Teaching the Effectiveness of Integrated Studies and Social Engagement: A Case Study on SDG Education in Depopulated Areas in Japan. Education Sciences, 13(3), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030250

Salas-Zapata, W. A., and Cardona-Arias, J. A. (2020). Knowledge, attitudes and practices of sustainability in university students: Comparative analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122841.

Sterling, S. (2010). Transformative learning and sustainability: Sketching the conceptual ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (5), 17-33.

UNESCO. (2014). Shaping the future we want: UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014) – Final report. UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2022). Education for Sustainable Development: Roadmap. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370511

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda