Concerning State Measures to Control Occupational Choice: Case Study on Occupation Regarding Providing Public Transport Service Via Application
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Since there is no specific regimes to regulate the public transportation services through applications. Thus, this article is focusing on these objectives as follows: (1) to study duties of state and rights and liberties of individuals concerning choosing occupation controlled by the state (2) to study the measurement and problem solving between services through application and currently service methods (3) to study present state measures regarding public transport service operation (4) to compare Thais laws and regulations with other countries respecting rights and liberties of citizen to provide public transport services through application (5) to analyze problems related to the exercise of people’s rights and freedoms to choose their occupations and (6) to propose measurements and solutions for problems regarding e-hailing business. Furthermore, according to (4) this documentary research demonstrated that Thailand should compare its laws and regulations with other countries to enact suitable legal measurements for e-hailing business. (5) Thailand should initiate specific secondary laws which could be amended to be up-to-date based on technological change. Lastly, as stated in (3) and (6), legal definition of e-hailing business should be prescribed in Vehicle Act, B.E. 2522 to conduce suitable management for private car hiring service business via application.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
Amornjitsuwan, S. (2017). Principles of Public Economic Law. Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Atthakorn, B. (1958). Political and Public Administration Theory. Bangkok: Thammasat University.
Boramanan, N. (2012). Administrative Law. Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Boramanan, N. (2017). Administrative Law Administrative Law Regarding Public Service. Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Charernthanawat, K. (2012). Basic Principles of Public Law. Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Droidsans Team. (2014). Compare 3 apps for calling taxis: Easy Taxi, Grab Taxi, and Uber. Retrieved July 20, 2018, from https://droidsans.com/compare-taxi-caller-apps-easytaxi-grabtaxi-uber/
Ratanasakaowong, K. (1997). Legality, Illegality, and Law Enforcement of Administrative Acts in the Law of Germany: Compilation of Articles on the Occasion of the 84th Anniversary of Professor Dr. Prayun Kanchanadun. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Sang-Uthai, Y. (2002). Introduction to the Science of Law. Bangkok: Prakaipreuk.
Thai Publica. (2017). Uber awakens Thais to amend their laws and regulations for new public transportation services—the state abides by the almost 40-year-old law while it is going to promote its vision as Thailand 4.0. Retrieved July 20, 2018, from https://thaipublica.org/2017/09/uber-28-9-2560/
Uwanno, B. (2017). Principles of Administrative Law: State Bangkok: Winyuchon.
Wisarutpit, W. (1995). Rights and Liberties in the Constitution. Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund.
