Main Article Content
The purpose of this research was to study the ways of improving the provincial administration and the local administration. The province can integrate public services. To the people effectively. And effective. Qualitative Research An in-depth interview and analysis of 20key informants were conducted. The research found that Thailand. Reform of government into modern state. There is a distinction between King Rama V. for the regional administration, both of France and Thailand have similar characteristics and goals, namely the expansion of power from the central to the regional. The case of Japan is a group of houses. It is a village to combine the activities and activities of the village. In the UK Similar in origin to Japan. Local government Reform was seriously underway when the promulgation of the 1997 Thai Constitution and the Declaration of Declaration of Decentralization Act BE 2542 were summarized as follows. (1) The local government structure is not ready to perform its assigned duties. (2) There is a duplication of mission. (3) Provincial administration is necessary and indispensable in shaping administrative administration. Is present (4) The reform of the central administration of the lack of unification lack of integration of the eight together as detailed in the article.
Damrong Rajanubhab. (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Damrong Rajanupab Institute.
Chardchawarn, S. (2018). Proposals for the reform of local government structure in Thailand. Journal of
King Prajadhipok's Institute. 16(1), 55-57.
Chareonwongsak, K. (2003). Integrated thinking. (6th ed.). Bangkok: Success Media.
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E.2540 (1997).
Determining Plan and Procedures in Decentralizations to the Local Administrative Organization B.E.2542 (1999).
Kanchanakun, P. (1995), Description of Administrative Law. (4th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Kawijong, A. (2012). Official Letter: Central State Power over Local Administrative Organizations, CMU Journal of
Law and Social Sciences, 5(2), 123-137.
Laothamatas, A. (2000). The reason for being local: The political problems at the national level due to
insufficient local governance. Bangkok: Bophit Printing.
Luangprapat, W. (2016). Centralization and decentralization and administration of the Kingdom of Thailand: a
review of concepts, controversies and considerations for reform. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok's Institute.
Mektrairat, N. et al. (2009). Report of the progress of decentralization in Thailand. Bangkok: Thammasat University,
Research and Consultancy Institute (TU-RAC).
Noranitipadungkarn, C. (2013). Krom Phraya Damrong Rajanupab with the Ministry of Interior. (4th ed.) Bangkok:
Office of the Public Sector Development Commission. (2014). Final Report, Project for Capacity Building in Central
Public Administration Regional and development, improving the relationship of government, central,
regional and local administration. n.p.: Author.
Riggs, W. F. (1966). Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.
Riggs, Fred W. (ed.). (1970). Frontier of Development Administration. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Ranney. A., & Willmoore. (1956). Democracy and the American Party System. New York: Harcourt. Brace and
Sartori, G. (1965). Democratic Theory. New York: Federrick A. Praeger.
Suksamran, S. (1984). Politics and government in the United Kingdom. Bangkok: Thai Wattana Panich.
Tanchai, W. (2014). Decentralization and democracy in Thailand. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok's Institute.