Constructing and Maintaining Pheu Thai Party’s Political Bastion in Northeastern Region of Thailand

Main Article Content

Pongsakorn Unnopporn
Suraphol Rajbhandaraks
Somboon Suksamran
Anek Laothamatas

Abstract

This study is conducted through qualitative research with three main objectives: (1) To examine strategy formulation in constructing and maintaining political support of Pheu Thai party in Northeastern region after the dissolution of People’s Power Party under military Coup between September 2006 to April 2018; (2) To study political and and legal obstructions toward political activities for maintaining Pheu Thai party stronghold after Coup d’état during May 2014 to April 2018; (3) To examine strategy formation for the upcoming election. Research Findings: Politics is a crucial factor that affect strategy formulation in constructing and maintaining political bastion of Pheu Thai party in Northeastern Thailand. Like former parties (Thai Rak Thai and People’s Power party), political marketing and communication are Pheu Thai’s strategies aiming at bastion maintenance in Northeastern region. 3.The major obstructions were the enactment of Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand Year 2017 specifically Article 265 and Article 279, and orders of National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO). 4.The freedom of formulating political strategy to captivate political bastion is confined under enacted laws.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Unnopporn, P., Rajbhandaraks, S., Suksamran, S., & Laothamatas, A. (2019). Constructing and Maintaining Pheu Thai Party’s Political Bastion in Northeastern Region of Thailand. Rajapark Journal, 13(31), 244–253. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RJPJ/article/view/160263
Section
Research Article

References

Betz, H. (1998). Introduction the new politics of the right: Neo-populist parties and movements in established
democracies. Hamshire and London: Macmillan Press.

Canovan M. (2002). Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. Hamshire and
New York: Palgrave.

Davis, G. A., & Scott, J. A (1983). Training creative thinking. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Deutsch, K. W. (1966). The nerves of government: Models of political communication and control. New
York: The Free Press.
Dubrin, J. (1998). Leadership study finding: Practice and skills. Boston Houghton: Mifflin Company.
Laothamatas, A. (2006). Thaksin-Populism. Bangkok: Matichon.

Less-Marshment, J. (2001). The marriage of political and marketing. Political Study, 49, 692-713.

Newman, B. I. (1994). The marketing of the president. CA: Sage Publication.

Noksuan, S. (2010). Comparative Politics and Government. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Pongsapit, A., & Kuwinpun, P. (2002). Patronage system. (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Rattanadilok Na Phuket, P. (2007). Leadership and practical guidelines for local administrator under
changing context. Journal of Local Development, 2(1). 121-148.

Thamrongthanyawong, S. (2006). Public policy: concepts, analysis, and processes. (14th ed.). Bangkok:
Sema Dharma.

Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. (A. M. Henderson & Talcott Person
Trans). New York: Harold Process.

Yeema, B. (2004). Populist Policy Platform and Economic Power: The Political Economy of THAI RAK THAI
PARTY’S Election Success. Doctor of Philosophy of Science, Chulalongkorn University.