Analysis of the Equilibrium of Public Interest and Owner's Right of Copyrighted Works in the Digital Era
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to compare and contrast legal issues pertaining to the significance and impact of copyright protection on the public interest in the digital era. According to the research findings, technological protection measures and rights management information were used to strictly prevent copyright infringement in digitally formatted works, thereby significantly affecting the equilibrium between copyright owners’ rights and the public interest in accessing copyrighted works in the digital age. Additionally, it was determined that the Copyright Act B.E, 2537 lacks a clear definition of technological protection measures, including whether such measures are sufficiently effective to be legally protected from circumvention. Furthermore, protection measures for rights management information are incompatible with the case of personal use of rights management information. As a result, the provisions relating to rights management information should be revised, as should the elements of “effective technological prevention measures,” in order to ensure that the Copyright Act B.E. 2537 is effectively enforced in the digital era.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
Imamura, T. (2012). The Guidebook for Exploitation of works, Agency for Cultural Affair, Government of Japan. http://www.bunka.go.jp/1tyosaku/c-l/pdf/tebiki.
Indananda, N. (2005). Copyright Protection in the Age of Information Technology. The Intellectual Property and International Trade Law Forum, 8, 169-196. https://ipitc.coj.go.th/th/content/category/detail/id/10357/cid/10364/iid/192564
Kuanpoth, J. (2007). Copyright in the Digital Age. http://www.ftawatch.org/sites/default/files/documents/2007_jakkrit_licences.pdf
Mendertsma, J. (2014, May 9). Theories of Copyright. The Ohio State University Libraries. https://library.osu.edu/site/copyright/2014/05/09/theories-of-copyright/
Pinyosinwat, J., & Butr-indr, B. (2021). Commentary on Intellectual Property Law. Faculty of Laws, Thammasat University.
Rodchan, J. (2012). Copyright: Legal Principle and Practice for the Protection and Use of Copyrighted Works. Winyuchon.
Saikia, N. (2010, May 17). The Exhaustion of Rights and Indian Copyright Law. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1630269, or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1630269
Krishnakumar, T., & Saha, K. (2012). India’s New Copyright Law: The Good, the Bad and the DRM, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 8(1), 15-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jps178
U.S. Copyright Office. (2008, March 13). The “Orphan Works” Problem and Proposed Legislation. U.S. Copyright Office. https://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031308.html
U.S. Copyright Office. (n.d.). Executive Summary Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998 Section 104 Report. U.S. Copyright Office. https://www.copyright.gov/reports/studies/dmca/dmca_executive.html