A Study of Stereotypical Images on Biologists and Biological Work Perceived by Thai Grade 10 Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to explore Thai Grade 10 students’ perceived images of biologists and biological work. The participants consisted of 50 students. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
The findings revealed that although biology is considered a specialized field of science, most students’ perceptions of biologists and biological work were still strongly influenced by traditional stereotypes associated with scientists in general. These perceptions also tended to lack diversity in terms of physical appearance, types of work, and working environments. The study therefore suggests that more diverse representations of biologists and biological work should be promoted through public media, learning materials, and classroom learning experiences. Such representations may help broaden Thai students’ perspectives on biology-related professions and inspire them to pursue further study or careers in biology-related fields.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Amnesty International. (2024). Thailand: passing of marriage equality bill a triumphant moment for LGBTI rights. Amnesty International. Retrieved Feb 10, 2026, from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/06/thailand-passing-of-marriage-equality-bill-a-triumphant-moment-for-lgbti-rights/
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), pp. 171-194.
Besley, J. C. (2015). Predictors of perceptions of scientists: Comparing 2001 and 2012. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 35(1-2), pp. 3-15.
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science education, 67(2), pp. 255-265.
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?. Psychological bulletin, 143(1). pp. 1-122.
Christidou, V., Hatzinikita, V., & Samaras, G. (2012). The image of scientific researchers and their activity in Greek adolescents’ drawings. Public Understanding of Science, 21(5), pp. 626-647.
Cornish, F., Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2013). Collaborative analysis of qualitative data. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. New York: SAGE.
Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., & Lo, L. (2013). Do gender–science stereotypes predict science identification and science career aspirations among undergraduate science majors?. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4), pp. 541-554.
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological science, 21(8), pp. 1051-1057.
Farland-Smith, D. (2009). Exploring middle school girls’ science identities: Examining attitudes and perceptions of scientists when working “Side-by-Side” with scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), pp. 415-427.
Ferguson, S. L., & Lezotte, S. M. (2020). Exploring the state of science stereotypes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the Draw-A-Scientist Checklist. School science and mathematics, 120(1), pp. 55-65.
Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School science and mathematics, 102(7), pp. 335-345.
Finson, K., & Pederson, J. (2011). What are visual data and what utility do they have in science education?. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), pp. 66-85.
Haynes, R. (2003). From alchemy to artificial intelligence: stereotypes of the scientist in Western literature. Public Understanding of Science, 12(3), pp. 243-253.
Karaçam, S. (2016). Investigating how the biographies of today’s scientists affect 8th graders’ scientist image. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), pp. 1971-1995.
Karaçam, S., Danışman, Ş., Bilir, V., & Digilli-baran, A. (2020). A scale development study: Scientist image, gender of the scientist and risks of being scientist. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(3), pp. 235-256.
Koch, A. J., D'Mello, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of applied psychology, 100(1), pp. 128-161.
Ladachart, L., Phothong, W., Suaklay, N., & Ladachart, L. (2020). Thai Elementary Science Teachers’ Images of “Engineer(s)” at Work. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(6), pp. 631-653.
Leblebicioglu, G., Cetin, P., Eroglu Dogan, E., Metin Peten, D., & Capkinoglu, E. (2021). How do science camps affect middle grade students’ image of scientists?. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(3), pp. 285-305.
Matthews, B. (1996). Drawing scientists. Gender and education, 8(2), pp. 231-244.
Mead, M. & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high-school students: A pilot study. Science, 126(3270), pp. 384-390.
Miller, D. I., Nolla, K. M., Eagly, A. H., & Uttal, D. H. (2018). The development of children's gender‐science stereotypes: A meta-analysis of 5 decades of US Draw-a-Scientist studies. Child development, 89(6), pp. 1943-1955.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 109(41), pp. 16474-16479.
Mulvey, K. L., Cerda-Smith, J., Joy, A., Mathews, C., & Ozturk, E. (2023). Factors that predict adolescents' engagement with STEM in and out of school. Psychology in the Schools, 60(9), pp. 3648-3665.
Schibeci, R. A. & Sorensen, I. (1983). Elementary school children's perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83(1), pp. 14-20.
Scholes, L., & Stahl, G. (2022). ‘I’m good at science but I don’t want to be a scientist’: Australian primary school student stereotypes of science and scientists. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(9), pp. 927-942.
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of personality and social psychology, 100(2), pp. 255-270.
Türkmen, H. (2008). Turkish primary students’ perceptions about scientist and what factors affecting the image of the scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), pp. 55-61.
Yang, D. & Zhou, M. (2017). Exploring Lower-Secondary School Students' Images and Opinions of the Biologist. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), pp. 855-872.
