RESEARCH SYNTHESIS : THE CAPABILITY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT FOR THE SUSTAINABLE ORGANIZATION PERFORMANCE IN THAILAND
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The academics article on “The research synthesis : The capability innovation management for sustainable organization performance in Thailand” aimed to reach dimensional of development of capability innovation management for sustainable organization performance of the agricultural industry in Thailand, which expected by the industry. This based on 2 key theories: 1) Resource Base View of Theory and 2) Contingency Theory. This paper presented a synthesis of research frameworks that integrate as independent variables in capability innovation management agricultural industry. There was a process of capability innovation management from the development of two dimensions : the entrepreneurship dimensions and the strategic dimensions. Finally, this article presented the theoretical and policy benefits and management. Including various restrictions In order to further the empirical research which will be useful for academic circles in the future.
Article Details
References
Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the Organizational Change Literature: A Model for Successful Change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28, 234-262.
Barney, J.B., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr., D.J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625-641.
Chathoth, P.K., Ungson, G.R., Harrington, R.J. & Chan, E.S.W. (2016). Co-creation and higher order customer engagement in hospitality and tourism services: A critical review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(2), 222 - 245.
Harimukti, W., Harm-Jan, S., & Aard, G. (2018). Exploring stakeholders’ support in international equity placement strategic alliance. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 20(2), 205-228.
Jeongeun, S., Tae-Eung, S., & Hyun-Woo, P. (2018). A network analysis of strategic alliance drivers in ICT open ecosystem: with focus on mobile, cloud computing and multimedia. Multimedia Tools and Application, 77(12), 14725 - 14745.
Kmieciak, R., Michna A., & Meczynska, A. (2012). Innovativeness, Empowerment and IT capability: Evidence from SMEs. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 112(5), 707-728. Retrieved from
www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdf/10.1108/0263557 1211232280
Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing Innovation Capability in Organizations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(03), 377-400.
McKeown, M. (2008). The Truth About Innovation. London, Prentice Hall.
Padilha, C. K., & Gomes, G. (2016). Innovation Culture and Cerformance in Innovation of Products and Processes: a Study in Companies of Textile Industry. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(4), 285-294.
Sauser, Brian J., Richard R. Reilly, and Aaron J. Shenhar. (2009). Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights–A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss. International Journal of Project Management, 27(7), 665-679.
Sazandrishvili, N. (2009). Contextual and Personal Antecedents of Innovative Behavior. (Master Thesis Project, University of Twente).
Shiavone, F., Metallo, C., & Agrifoglio, R. (2014). Extending the dart model for social media. International Journal of Technology Management, 66(4), 271-287.
Theodorakopoulos, N., & Budhwar, P. (2015). Guest Editors' Introduction: Diversity and Inclusion in Different Work Settings: Emerging Patterns, Challenges, and Research Agenda. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 177-197. Doi:10.1002/hrm.21715
Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2010). How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 224-231.
