Assessment for Learning: Improving Transition from University to Workplaces for Preservice Teachers in the 21st Century

Main Article Content

Sasanun Bunyawanich
Chayapon Chomchaiya
Nutthaporn Owatnupat
Abdul Ghaffar

Abstract

       This qualitative study intended to (1) explore existing assessment methods applied in a Thai preservice teacher program, (2) investigate assessment for learning and its elements that can promote professional identity and ease transition from university to workplace for preservice teachers in the 21st century working atmosphere, and (3) provide recommendations on improving assessment approaches for the preservice teacher training program. The semi-structured interviews were carried out to collect data from eight lecturers in the teacher training program. The findings revealed that (1) various assessment approaches were adopted as viewed proper by the lecturers such as multiple-choice, take-home, and project-based examinations for formative and summative assessments. Assessment for learning served the purpose of promoting the students’ learning by engaging students, peers, and lecturers to seek, reflect upon, and respond to information. Feedbacks provided by students and lecturers were used for the improvement of teaching and learning regularly leading to self-regulation. This self-regulation enhanced teacher identity and eased transition from university to workplace in the 21st century of preservice teachers. A call for change of assessment approach to be more diverse and flexible was evident. Although the lecturers were uncertain about assessment for learning, they already adopted elements of assessment for learning in their classroom practices. Thus, it is possible to implement assessment for learning as assessment development which helps elevate teacher identity of the preservice teachers.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bunyawanich, S., Chomchaiya, C., Owatnupat, N., & Ghaffar, A. (2022). Assessment for Learning: Improving Transition from University to Workplaces for Preservice Teachers in the 21st Century. STOU Education Journal, 15(2), 38–53. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edjour_stou/article/view/257078
Section
Research Article

References

Abbasnasab Sedigheh, S., & Mohd Saad, M. R. (2013). Defining Assessment for Learning: A proposed definition from a sociocultural perspective. Life Science Journal, 10(2), 2493-2497.

Androusou, A., & Tsafos, V. (2018). Aspects of the professional identity of preschool teachers in Greece: investigating the role of teacher education and professional experience. Teacher Development, 22(4), 554-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1438309

Baas, D., Castelijns, J., Vermeulen, M., Martens, R., & Segers, M. (2015). The relation between Assessment for Learning and elementary students' cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 33-46.

Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335.

Bearman, M. (2019). Eliciting rich data: A practical approach to writing semi-structured interview schedules. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 20(3), 1-11.

Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224-226.

Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1xcs68

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. (pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

Brown, A., & Danaher, P. A. (2019). CHE Principles: facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1379987

Chible, H. (2021). Proposed Method to Be Adopted For Online Exam Without Proctored Environment During Covid 19. International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies,7(4).

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Cruickshank, D. R., & Metcalf, K. K. (1993). Improving preservice teacher assessment through on‐campus laboratory experiences. Theory Into Practice, 32(2), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543580

Dassa, L., & Derose, D. S. (2017). Get in the Teacher Zone: A Perception Study of Preservice Teachers and Their Teacher Identity. Issues in Teacher Education, 26(1), 101-113. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1139340.pdf

Dearnley, C. (2005). A reflection on the use of semi-structured interviews. Nurse Researcher (through 2013), 13(1), 19-28.

DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), e000057.

Donaldson, J. H., & Gray, M. (2012). Systematic review of grading practice: Is there evidence of grade inflation? Nurse Education in Practice, 12(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.10.007

Eutsler, L., & Curcio, R. (2019). Private blog reflections connecting course content with field experiences: preservice teachers grapple with teacher identity. Reflective Practice, 20(2), 250-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1586663

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Gardner, J. (2012). Assessment and learning (2nd ed.) https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333-2351.

Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Harrell, M. C., & Bradley, M. A. (2009). Data collection methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA512853.pdf

Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181-1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360

Hitt, A. M., & Helms, E. C. (2009). Best in Show: Teaching old dogs to use new rubrics. Professional Educator, 33(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ862760.pdf

Holmqvist, M. (2019). Lack of qualified teachers: A global challenge for future knowledge development. In Teacher education in the 21st century (pp. 1-13). https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/65030

Irwin, B., & Hepplestone, S. (2012). Examining increased flexibility in assessment formats. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(7), 773-785. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.573842

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Laveault, D., & Allal, L. (2016). Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (Vol. 4). Springer.

Levitt, H. M. (2021). Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000184

Little, J. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers. Teachers college record, 91(4), 509-536.

Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. Qualitative Report, 26(6).

Lombardi, M. M. (2008). Making the grade: The role of assessment in authentic learning. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, 1-16. http://146.186.15.14/users/j/m/jmd394/saw4/infoseek/makingthegrade.pdf

Martin, D. L., & Itter, D. (2014). Valuing assessment in teacher education-Multiple-choice competency testing. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 39(7), 1-14. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1029779.pdf

McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674

Medico, D., & Santiago-Delefosse, M. (2014). From reflexivity to resonances: Accounting for interpretation phenomena in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(4), 350-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.915367

Ng, E. M. W. (2016). Fostering pre-service teachers' self-regulated learning through self- and peer assessment of wiki projects. Computers & Education, 98, 180-191.

Oates, J. (2015). Use of Skype in interviews: The impact of the medium in a study of mental health nurses. Nurse Researcher (2014), 22(4), 13.

Oh, E., & French, R. (2004). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of an introductory instructional technology course. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 3(1), 37-48.

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.548.2295&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Padilla-Díaz, M. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as science or philosophical science. International journal of educational excellence, 1(2), 101-110. http://www.anagmendez.net/cupey/pdf/ijee_1_2.pdf#page=102

Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872

Randles, C. (2012). Phenomenology: A review of the literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 30(2), 11-21.

Riger, S., & Sigurvinsdottir, R. (2016). Thematic analysis. Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods, 33-41.

Rosemartin, D. S. (2013). Assessment for learning: Shifting our focus. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 49(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2013.759826

Scherr, M., & Johnson, T. G. (2019). The construction of preschool teacher identity in the public-school context. Early Child Development and Care, 189(3), 405-415.

Sevimli-Celik, S. (2020). Moving between theory and practice: preparing early childhood pre-service teachers for teaching physical education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 42(3), 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2020.1735588

Sutherland, L., Howard, S., & Markauskaite, L. (2010). Professional identity creation: Examining the development of beginning preservice teachers' understanding of their work as teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.006

Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic Assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838

Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2, 17-37.

Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., . . . Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563220303903

Vehovar, V., Toepoel, V., & Steinmetz, S. (2016). The SAGE handbook of survey methodology. In. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Weiland, I. S., Hudson, R. A., & Amador, J. M. (2014). Preservice Formative Assessment Interviews: The Development of Competent Questioning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9402-3

Whorton, R., Casillas, A., Oswald, F. L., Shaw, A., Burrus, J., Mattern, K., . . . Roberts, R. (2017). Critical Skills for the 21st Century Workforce. Building better students: Preparation for the workforce, 47-72.

Willis, J., & Adie, L. (2014). Teachers using annotations to engage students in assessment conversations: recontextualising knowledge. The Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 495-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.968599