Protection of Appellant’s Rights as Administrative Orders in Notifying the Legal Rights to Legal File a Lawsuit
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to analyze the protection of appellant’s rights as administrative order in notifying the legal rights to file a lawsuit as efficiently. Is qualitative research from documentary study, in-depth interviews, focus group of collecting data to develop relevant laws, whereof the protection of appellant’s rights as administrative order in notifying the legal rights to file a lawsuit that allow people to not lose their rights or have their cases expire. Currently, the administrative order issuer a being the rights informant and appeals Judge in notifying the legal rights to file a lawsuit. The research findings indicate that the protection of defendants' rights in administrative orders regarding the notification of legal rights in legal proceedings is vital to prevent citizens from losing their rights or having their cases dismissed due to exceeding the legal timeframe. Presently, the issuers of administrative orders are responsible for both notifying individuals of their rights and assessing objections to these notifications. However, when the legal objection period expires, there is no legal provision to notify individuals about the time frame for filing a legal complaint. Consequently, numerous cases are dismissed because defendants are unaware of the specified legal deadline. Research suggestions include amending the Administrative Procedures Act of 2539 B.E. (1996) to mandate that issuer of administrative. orders must notify defendants of their objections and inform them about the legal timeframe for filing a complaint all at once, starting from the moment the objection occurs within the administrative staff.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Utthayan. K. (1973). Political Science (2nd edition) Bangkok: Thaiwattanapanich.
Puangngam. K. (2003). Local government in Thailand: principles and new dimensions in the future Bangkok: Winyuchon Publishing House.
Wongburanawat. C. (1998). Thai public administration. Chiang Mai: Department of Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences Chiang Mai University.
Iammayura C., Wachirarattanakornkul. R. (2016) “Problems with interpreting rights and duties of the parties to the telecommunications concession
contract”. Administrative Court Academic Journal.16(3),57–86. (In Thai).
Rakprachakon.C., Sukonthasap.S., andHongwittayakorn.U. (2015). Cooperation model In Educational organization of local government organizations. Srinakharinwirot Research and Development Journal (Humanities and Social Sciences). 7(13), 47. (In Thai).
Wongwattanasart. C. (1997). Law on government procedures. Bangkok: Jirarat Publishing.
Sawangsak. C. (M.P.). Explanation of administrative law. (13th printing) Bangkok: Winyuchon Publishing House.
Sawangsak. C. (1998). Juristic persons under public law. Bangkok: Winyuchon Publishing House.
Sawangsak. C. (2007). Explanation of administrative law. (11th printing) Bangkok: Winyuchon Publishing House.
Yuvaboon. C. (1960). Centralization and decentralization of administrative power in Thai law. Bangkok: Local printing House.
Wannapanich. B. (2001). Principles of law regarding administrative procedures. Bangkok: Office of the Administrative Court.
Singhaneti. B. (2017). Legal principles regarding administrative control. (4th printing) Bangkok: Winy chon Publishing House.
Kanchanadul. P. (1994). Lectures on administrative law. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Kanchanadul. P. (1995). Description of administrative law. (4th printing) Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Hongsiri. R. (1998). "Review of Administrative Orders" Collection of academic articles on administrative procedures, 1996. Bangkok: Winy chon Publishing House.