Consumer Protection for Online Shopping: Cases of Consumers Being Damaged by Unsafe Products in Thailand
Keywords:
Consumer, Unsafe Products, Damage, LiabilityAbstract
With technological advances, products go through more complicated production processes. When consumers buy sophisticated products, problems tend to arise. For example, consumers find it difficult to detect unsoundness of a product when they buy it. This can cause harm to consumers’ physical and mental health: It can also affect their health, hygiene, and property. In addition, it is difficult for consumers to file a lawsuit to claim compensation for damage caused by unsafe products because the burden falls on consumers to prove unsoundness of the product, while manufacturers have all knowledge of the products. As a result, consumers lose their cases and do not get compensation for the damage. To mitigate such problems, Thailand has enacted the Product Liability Act to cope with damages caused by unsafe products. This academic article discusses criteria under the act and analyzes its pros and cons. Based on an analysis, the act has criteria that is beneficial to consumers because it allows consumers to receive more compensation for damage caused by unsafe products. However, the act has some disadvantages. For example, it does not cover immovable property and services.
References
Channarong Pranechit. (2008). The Principle under the Consumer Case Procedure Act, B.E. 2551. (Bangkok: The Office of The Judiciary). [In Thai]
Fürst. A. Pecornik and Hoyer, W. D. (2024). How product complexity affects consumer adoption of new products: The role of feature heterogeneity and interrelatedness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52, 329–348.
Rebecca Stone. (2024). The Inequality of Bargaining Power Principle. UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 24-2, Research Handbook on the Philosophy of Contract Law (Prince Saprai & Mindy Chen-Wishart eds., Edward Elgar Publishing, Forthcoming)
Supit Praneedpolkrung. (2015). Consumer Case Procedure. (Bangkok: Nititham Publication). [In Thai]
Teeravath Chantarasomboon. (2014). The Explanation of the Product Liability Act, B.E. 2551. (Bangkok: Nititham Publication). [In Thai]
William J. Storck. (2005). Merck to Appeal Loss of First Vioxx Suit. Chemical and Engineering News. Volume 83 Issue 35; [cited 12 Apr 2025]. Available from: https://cen.acs.org/articles/83/i35/Merck-Appeal-Loss-First-Vioxx.html.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Disclaimer and Copyright Notice
The content and information presented in articles published in the Journal of Law and Public Health Policy represent the opinions and sole responsibility of the respective authors. The editorial board does not necessarily agree with or assume any responsibility for the views expressed.
All articles, data, content, images, and other materials published in the Journal of Law and Public Health Policy are the intellectual property of the journal. Any individual or organization wishing to reproduce, distribute, or otherwise use the entirety or any part of such materials must provide proper citation.