Administrative Court Procedures in Environmental Health and Public Health Cases

Authors

  • Prof.Dr.Chardsumon Prutipinyo Department of Public Health Administration, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University

Keywords:

Administrative Court Procedure, Environmental Health, Public Health, Inquisitorial System, Administrative Court, Rule of Law

Abstract

This article aims to examine and explain the administrative court procedures in environmental health and public health cases in Thailand, with emphasis on legal processes, the role of the Administrative Court, and practical applications for professional practice. This study employs documentary research through the analysis of the Act on Establishment of Administrative Courts and Administrative Court Procedure B.E. 2542 (1999), related regulations, and Supreme Administrative Court judgments concerning environmental and public health disputes, particularly a nuisance case involving a swine farm, in order to demonstrate the practical application of administrative law principles.

The findings indicate that the Thai administrative court system applies an inquisitorial system in which the court plays an active role in investigating facts and gathering evidence to protect citizens’ rights and public interests, especially in cases involving scientific complexity and impacts on health and the environment. The major procedures include filing a lawsuit, examination of complaints, evidence collection, interim protective measures, dispute mediation, court hearings and judgments, appeals, and enforcement of judgments. Furthermore, the Administrative Court plays a crucial role in controlling the exercise of administrative power in accordance with the rule of law and principles of fairness.

In conclusion, administrative court procedures in environmental health and public health cases serve as an important mechanism for protecting citizens’ rights, reducing health and environmental impacts, and promoting transparent and accountable public administration. The study can also serve as a practical guideline or handbook for legal practitioners, public health professionals, and related personnel in effectively handling administrative disputes.

References

Administrative Office. (2024). Supreme Administrative Court Judgment No. Aor. Phor. 16/2024. Bangkok, Thailand: Office of the Administrative Courts.

Act on Establishment of Administrative Courts and Administrative Court Procedure, B.E. 2542 (1999) (as amended up to B.E. 2564 (2021)).

Bell, S., McGillivray, D., & Pedersen, O. (2013). Environmental law (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Cane, P. (2011). Administrative law (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Craig, P. (2018). EU administrative law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

European Commission. (2021). Environmental implementation review 2021. European Union.

European Union. (2020). Aarhus Convention and environmental justice. Publications Office of the European Union.

Gill, G. N. (2012). The National Green Tribunal of India: A sustainable future through the principles of international environmental law. Environmental Law Review, 14(3), 183–204.

Office of the Administrative Courts. (2019). Regulation of the General Assembly of Judges of the Supreme Administrative Court on Administrative Execution Procedures (No. 8), B.E. 2562 (2019). Bangkok, Thailand: Thailand Administrative Court Office.

World Health Organization. (2020a). Environment, climate change and health. WHO.

World Health Organization. (2020b). Environmental health and public health considerations. WHO Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

Prutipinyo, P. (2026). Administrative Court Procedures in Environmental Health and Public Health Cases. Journal of Health Policy, Law and Administration, 12(1), 199–220. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal_law/article/view/289306

Issue

Section

Interesting Law/Supreme Court Order