The Quality of Life of Students Living in Dormitory Rajabhat Rajabhat University

Authors

  • Nawasanan Wongprasit Lecturer, Faculty of Science and Technology, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Thailand
  • Nataprakal Yanmanovisit Lecturer, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Thailand
  • Chatchai Prapatsorn Lecturer, Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Thailand
  • Pornpimol Viriyakul Special Lecturer, Faculty of Management, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Thailand
  • Wichit Seangsawang Special Lecturer, Faculty of Education, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Thailand

Keywords:

the quality of life, students, dormitory, Rajabhat Rajanagarindra university

Abstract

               The research was to compare in the quality of student’s lives in dormitory Rajabhat Rajabhat University classified by genders, ages, faculties, college years, grade averages, costs of living, incomes and expenses difference, roommate’s faculties, extra incomes and a number of room members. The population was the 1350 students in the academic year 2019 living in the university’s dormitory determined the sample size by using Krejcie & Morgan table as 316 students. Stratified random sampling was used in this research, collecting data by questionnaire that showed the value of reliability as 0.97. The sample sampling method was used in this research. The statistical methods for data analysis were average, percentage, standard deviation, and t-test, F-test.

              This study found that the quality of student’s lives in the university’s dormitory was moderate as a whole. The researcher analyzing for each factor found that the highest average factor was education. Next below average factors were society, health, environment, and serviced facility around the dormitory. The lowest average factor was the quality of the room. The average score of comparison result showed that these factors; genders, faculties, college years, incomes, extra incomes, a number of room members were different caused the quality of student’s lives was quite different, but on other hand, the factors of ages, grade averages, incomes and expenses difference, and roommate’s faculties were different caused the quality of student’s lives was not different and statistically significant at 0.05 level.

              This research also found that the factor of low average score was the quality of room that the students were satisfied in facilities, cleanness, tidiness, comfort, security, and being open-minded. Thus; the researcher offered suggestions to the executive board of the university’s dormitory finding the methods out to improve the dormitory for continually keeping the student’s satisfaction.

References

กมลรัตน์ ทองสว่าง. (2560). คุณภาพชีวิตของนักศึกษา คณะพยาบาลศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏชัยภูมิ. วารสารสาระคาม, 8(2), 1-14.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ สำนักนายกรัฐมนตรี. (2560). สรุปสาระสำคัญแผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติฉบับที่สิบสองพ.ศ. 2560 – 2564. สืบค้นจาก http://www.prachinburi.go.th/plan12.pdf

วินิทรา นวลละออง. (2555). ปัจจัยที่สัมพันธ์กับคุณภาพชีวิตของนักศึกษาแพทย์ชั้นปีที่ 1. วารสารสมาคมจิตแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย, 57(2), 225-234.

พวงทอง ไกรพิบูลย์. (2560, 2 ธันวาคม ). คุณภาพชีวิต (Quality of life). สืบค้นจาก http://haamor.com

พัชราภรณ์ ลันศรี, และ อภิศักดิ์ อุ่มจันสา (2561). คุณภาพชีวิตของนิสิตที่พักอาศัยในหอพักมหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ วิทยาเขตเฉลิมพระเกียรติ จังหวัดสกลนคร. วารสารวิชาการ ปขมท, 7(2), 77 – 87.

วรางคณา กีรติวิบูลย์. (2557). ความพึงพอใจของนิสิตต่อการจัดการของหอพัก มหาวิทยาลัยทักษิณ วิทยาเขตพัทลุง. วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์ มข, 42(4), 856-866.

Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1–55.

Muslim, M. H., Karim, H. A., & Abdullah, I. C. (2012). Satisfaction of students’s living of environment between on campus and off -campus setting: A conceptual overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 601 – 614.

Shaikh, B. T., & Deschampsd, J. (2006). Life in a university residence: Issues, concerns and responses. Education for Health, 19(1), 43 – 51.

Wongprasit, N. (2018). The Student Development Model for Prevention of Brain Fatigue Symptoms with Full Service Method of Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University, Thailand. Oral Presentation at the Universal Academic Cluster International Spring Conference in Hokkaido to be held in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan on 11-13 May 2018.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-24

How to Cite

Wongprasit, N., Yanmanovisit, N., Prapatsorn, C., Viriyakul, P., & Seangsawang, W. (2020). The Quality of Life of Students Living in Dormitory Rajabhat Rajabhat University. Research and Development Journal, Loei Rajabhat University, 15(52), 61–72. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/researchjournal-lru/article/view/241836

Issue

Section

Research article