Agrochemicals Use Reduction Compensation of Chiang Dao Farmers in Chiang Mai Province

Main Article Content

Waraporn Nunthase
Ke Nunthasen


Chiang Dao district in Chiang Mai province is located nearby two food safety districts however Chiang Dao is not a member of Chiang Mai food safety network. Therefore, this paper applies a choice experiments to estimate the willingness to accept of farmers for reducing the use of agrochemical inputs in their fields. The four attributes           are identified including use of chemical fertilizer, chemical herbicide, chemical insecticide, and compensation. The empirical results found that less than 1500 baht / rai / year of compensation may encourage farmers to reduce agrochemicals use in their farms. These amounts of compensation are not only encouraging farmers to reduce agrochemicals use but also causing the positive effects to farmers and consumers health as well as environments


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Research Articles


Adamowicz W., J.Louviere, and M. Williams. (1994). Combining Revealtd and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 26, 271-292.
Bateman I. al. (2003). Guidelines for the Use of Stated Preference Techniques for the Valuation of Preferences for Non-market Goods, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Birol E., M.Smale and A. Gyovai. (2006). Using a Choice Experiment to Estimate Farmers’ Valuation of Agrobiodiversity on Hungarian Small Farms. Environmental and Resource Economic. 34, 439 - 469.
Bureau of Occupational and Environmental Diseases. (2012). Illness and Effects of Pesticides. Retrieved January 29, 2018,
Green Net. (2019). Policies on Organic Agriculture in Thailand. Retrieved February 28, 2019.
Green Net. (2019). Thai Organic 2017/18: Leap Jump but will It be Sustainable. Retrieved February 28, 2019. from
Hfocus. (2019). Effects of Pesticides. Retrieved March 29, 2020,
Hnin Ei Win. (2017). Organic Agriculture in Thailand. Retrieved February 9, 2020.
Jianjun J., W. Wenyu, H. Rui and G. Haozhou. (2017). Valuing Health Risk in Agriculture: A Choice Experiment Approach to Pesticide Use in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Resource. 24, 17526 - 17533.
Khan M. and C.A. Damalas. (2015). Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Less Health Risks by Pesticide Use: A Case Study From the Cotton Belt of Punjab, Pakistan. Science of theTotal Environment. 15, 297 - 303.
Lancaster K. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy. 84, 132 - 157.
Nunthasen K. andW. Nunthasen. (2019). Organic Farming Policy Effects in Northern of Thailand: Spatial Lag Analysis. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 769, 297 - 305.
Office of Agricultural Economics. (2019). Quantity and Value of Import Hazard Agricultural Products in 2011-2017. Retrieved March 1, 2019. from
Pompratansombat P., B.Bauer and H. Boland. (2011).
The Adoption of Organic Rice Farming in Northeastern Thailand. Journal of Organic System. 6(3), 4 - 12.
Stolze M. and N.Lampkin (2009). Policy for Organic Farming: Rationale and Concepts. Journal of Food Policy. 34, 237 – 244.
Sukallaya K. and B. T. Gopal. (2011). Crop Diversification in Thailand: Status, Determinants, and Effects on Income and Use of Inputs. Journal of Land Use Policy. 28, 618 - 628.

The Government Public Relationship Department. (2014). New Strategies for Developing Thailand’s Organic Agriculture. Retrieved on February 9, 2020. from
Yu, L.L. and Y.Y. Cai. (2015). Ecological Compensation Based on Farmers' Willingness: A Case Study of Jingsan County in Hubei Province, China. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 26(1), 215 - 223.
Veisi A., M.Gholami and N.Shiri. (2013).What are the Barriers to the Development of Organic Farming?. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 13(3), 321 - 326.