Main Article Content
The purposes of this study were: 1) to examine the six lifestyles of Australian and Thai urban and rural areas students in total and in each style, and 2) to compare the students’ lifestyles across social spaces (urban and rural) and across countries (Australia and Thailand). The participants of the study consisted of 213 students (112 Thai students and 101 Australian students) Set the sample size by using budget and accidental sampling. The instruments included the lifestyles t questionnaire. The questionnaire has discrimination by Item total correlation coefficient between .54 - .88 and reliability measured by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.79. The statistics used in the study were mean, standard deviation, and t-test. The results revealed that:
- The results showed that all groups of participants had the scores of lifestyles at the average levels. Excepting conservative and homey styles, the Thai participants had the scores at the high level. The Australian participants from urban area had the highest preference on healthy lifestyle, but the least preference on trendy lifestyle. The Australian participants from rural area had the highest score on night going lifestyle, but the lowest score on conservative lifestyle. Interestingly, the Thai participants both from urban and rural areas favored conservative style, but not night going style.
2. There was the statistically significant difference between Thai and Australian students urban and rural areas at 0.05. Interestingly, the Thai participants had more apparent lifestyles than Australian participants in overall and each type of life styles, but not for night going lifestyle. The healthy lifestyle of Australian participants was higher than Thai participants.
1. Every article to be published must be screened by peer reviewer
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
Ashton, M.C.(2019). Individual Differences and Personality. (3rd ed.). London: Academic Press.
Barry, M.M., Van Lente, E., Molcho, M., Morgan, K., McGee, H., Conroy, R. & Perry, I.(2009). SLÁN 2007: Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition in Ireland: Mental Health and Social Well-being Report.
Carson, R.C. (2019). Interaction concepts of personality. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Cosmas, S.C. (1982). Life styles and Consumption Patterns. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(4), 453 - 455.
Dowdy, S., Wearden, S. and Chilko, D.(2004). Statistics for Research. Thirth edition. New Jersey. Wiley-Interscience A John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publication.
Dao-Tran, H.T., Seib, C., Jones, L. and Anderson, D. (2014). A cross cultural comparison of health related quality of life and its associated factors among older women in Vietnam and Australia. BMC Research Notes. 11(174), 1 – 7.
Favaretto, R.M., Musse, S.R. and Costa, A.B. (2019). Emotion, Personality and Cultural Aspects in Crowds: Towards a Geometrical Mind. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Healey, J.F. (2015). The Essentials of Statistics : A Tool for Social Research. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing.
Hofstede, G. and McCrae, R.R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited : Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-cultural research, 38(1), 52 - 88.
Li, Y., Pan, A., Wang, D. D., Liu, X., Dhana, K., Franco, O. H., & Hu, F. B. (2018). Impact of healthy lifestyle factors on life expectancies in the US population. Circulation, 138(4), 345-355.
Mazhariazad, F. and Rozbe, N.(2014). The relationship between lifestyle and general health of students at
Islamic Azad University of Bandar Abbas. Hormozgan Medical Journal. Vol 18, No. 6, Feb-Mar 2015 : 482 - 489.
Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S.(2014). Using Multivariate Statistics Pearson New International Edition. New York. Pearson.
Thirlaway, K. and Upton, D.(2009). The Psychology of Lifestyle: Promoting Healthy Behaviour. Routledge Publishing.