A Comparison of Learning Achievement In Analytical Thinking and Attitude Towards Learning Integers System of Matthayomsuksa 1 Students Using Multiple Intelligences Theory And Co-Operative Learning
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aims of this study were to : 1) develop lesson plans regarding Multiple Intelligences Theory and Co-operative learningin Integers system of Mattayomsuksa 1students with 75/75 basis. 2) find out an effective index of Learning organization employing Multiple Intelligences Theory and Co-operative Learning in Integers system of Matthayomsuksa 1 students. 3) compare students’ Mathematics Learning Achievement in Analytical thinking and Attitude towards Mathematics learning in Integers system of Mattayomsuksa 1 when using Multiple Intelligences Theory and Co-operative learning.The samples were 83 Mattayomsuksa 1 students from two class who studied in semester 1, academic year 2018 of Thatumprachasermwit school, under The Secondary Educational Service Area Office 33 using the cluster random sampling. The statistics used were percentage, mean, standard deviation and One – way ANOVA to test the hypothesis.The results of the study were as follows :1) Lesson plans regarding Multiple Intelligences Theory and Co-operative learningin Integers system of Mattayomsuksa 1students had the efficiency of 78.62/76.35 and80.95/79.84 respectively. 2) The effective indexes of learning organization employing Multiple Intelligences Theory and Co-operative learning approach in Integers system of Mattayomsuksa 1students are 0.6443 and0.6808 respectively. This showed that the students who learnt through Multiple Intelligences Theory and Co-operative learning progressed in learning at 64.43 percent and 68.08 percent correspondingly.3) The students who learnt through Multiple Intelligences Theory and Co-operative learning approach had attitudes towards Mathematics in no difference way. However, learning achievements and analytical thinking abilities for Mathematics of the students who learnt through Co-operative learning approach were higher than who learnt through Multiple Intelligences Theory at the .05 level of significance.
Article Details
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
Ministry of Education. (2008).Indicators and core learning content Group learning mathematics According to the core curriculum of basic education 2008.Bangkok : Printing Agriculture Cooperatives of Thailand.
Kalyakorn Kaewroj. (2013). Comparisons of Learning Achievement on Linear Equation with one variable for Mathayomsuksa 1 Students, MathematicalReasoning and Analytical Thinking Abilities Between Using Cooperative Learning TAI Technique and Applied MultipleIntelligence Theory.Master’s thesis. Mahasarakham:Mahasarakham University.
Chonnicha Sanggaew. (2014). A Comparison of Learning Achievement, Analytical Thinking and Achievement Motivation of Mathayomsuksa 2 students BetweenUsing Learning Based on the Constructionism Theory and Multiple Intelligence Theory.Master’s thesis. Mahasarakham:Mahasarakham University.
Doungduen on-noum. (1999).Developing and enhancing mathematics teaching competencies of elementary school teachers. Bangkok :Faculty of Education,Chulalongkorn University.
Tisana Khammani. (2014).Teaching Science : Knowledge for Organizing Effective Learning Processes. 15th Edition. Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University.
Teerapat Sarngkam.(2013). Comparisons of Learning Achievement, Analytic Thinking,and Mathematical Reasoning of Prathomsuksa 6Students Between Who Learned Using Cooperative Learning with TAI Approach andBased on The Multiple Intelligences TheoryApproach. Master’s thesis. Mahasarakham:Mahasarakham University.
Nalini Na Nakorn. (2009). Principles of measurement and evaluation of thinkingVolume 1.Nonthaburi : Project for the development of children and youth in remote areas under the initiative of Her Royal HighnessPrincess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn.
Nittaya Semlao.(2014). Comparisons of LearningAchievement in Summation Subtraction AndMultiplication of Decimal, Problem Solving And Attitude toward Mathematics of pratomsuksa5 Students between TAI and TGT Group LearningMethods.Master’s thesis. Mahasarakham:Mahasarakham University.
Pakin Anantakitbamrung. (2014). A Comparison of Learning Achievement, Mathematical Reasoning Ability and Attitude Towards Mathematical Learning ofMathayomsuksa 1 Students Between Using Learning Organization of the Cooperative Learning with STAD Approach and Learningwith TGT Approach, Entitled The One -Variable Linear EquationMaster’s thesis. Mahasarakham:Mahasarakham University.
Pattrawadee Srisarakham. (2014). Development of Learning Management in Mathematics to Enhance Academic Achievement and AnalyticThinking, Based on ApproachCombined with Conceptions of Constructivist Theory and Cooperative Learning, for Prathomsuksa 4 Students. Master’s thesis. Mahasarakham:Mahasarakham University.
Yupin Phiphitkul.(2002). Mathematics teaching. Bangkok : Faculty of Education,Chulalongkorn University.
Rachanee Nomrawee.(2011). Comparisons ofLearning Achievement Entitled “A LinearEquation in One Variable,” Analytical Thinking and Attitudes toward Mathematics of Mathayomsuksa 1 Students Who Learned Using the TGT Learning Model and the 4 MAT LearningModel.Master’s thesis. Mahasarakham:Mahasarakham University.
Nomsri Kate. (2008). Learning management using various forms. 2nd Edition. Nonthaburi : Academic Support Center.
Wimonrat Soonthornroj. (2006). Innovation forLearning. Mahasarakham : Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Mahasarakham University.
National Institute of Educational Testingservice PublicOrganizetion. (2016) O-net test reportM.3 academic year 2016. (http://www.niets.or.th) 31 march2016.
National Institute of Educational Testingservice PublicOrganizetion. (2017) O-net test report M.3 academic year 2017. (http://www.niets.or.th)31 march2017.
ArreeSanhachawee. (2000). Multiple Intelligence and Cooperative Learning. Bangkok : Wean Keaw.
Peera rattanavichit. (2001). Application of multiple intelligence theories to learning reform. Bangkok : Thammasarn.
Chowwalit Chookhampaeng. (2008). Curriculum development.Mahasarakham : Mahasarakham University.