วิธีการเปรียบเทียบความแตกต่างค่าเฉลี่ยรายคู่หลังการวิเคราะห์ความแปรปรวน Post-hoc Multiple Comparison Tests
Main Article Content
Abstract
In testing the difference of three or more population means by using the analysis of variance when the
null hypothesis is rejected at a predetermine alpha level, called the test result is significant at the a level, the
researcher have to test which population means are different from the rest. This method is called the posthoc
multiple comparison tests, which can help the researcher to make conclusion about the greatest
population mean. The researcher must select the appropriate method which can control the overall type I
alpha rate equal to the predetermined alpha level and also reserve the power of the test. This article presents
various methods of the post-hoc multiple comparison tests for the researcher to use appropriately in reporting
the research results.
null hypothesis is rejected at a predetermine alpha level, called the test result is significant at the a level, the
researcher have to test which population means are different from the rest. This method is called the posthoc
multiple comparison tests, which can help the researcher to make conclusion about the greatest
population mean. The researcher must select the appropriate method which can control the overall type I
alpha rate equal to the predetermined alpha level and also reserve the power of the test. This article presents
various methods of the post-hoc multiple comparison tests for the researcher to use appropriately in reporting
the research results.
Article Details
How to Cite
สุขศรีงาม ไ. (2015). วิธีการเปรียบเทียบความแตกต่างค่าเฉลี่ยรายคู่หลังการวิเคราะห์ความแปรปรวน Post-hoc Multiple Comparison Tests. Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Journal, 8(1), 23–30. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rmuj/article/view/28738
Section
Academic Articles
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.