The Development of Logistics Performance Index for Transportation Services Providers

Authors

  • Rojanee Homchalee Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University
  • Manikar Lamanee Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Thailand
  • Sirapassorn Kaensing Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55766/LVJQ4727

Keywords:

Logistics, Transportation, Services Providers, Performance Index

Abstract

Thailand has the highest proportion of land transportation compared to other types of transportation. The objective of this research is to develop logistics performance index for domestic truck transportation service providers. From a review of literature on logistics and transportation including the study of regulations and laws on land transportation, the researchers have therefore been able to design and develop 23 indicators which are divided into three aspects consisting of 6 indicators of input aspect, 9 indicators of process aspect, and 8 indicators of result aspect. There are two types of indicators including quantitative indicators which are percentage criteria, and qualitative indicators which are rubric score criteria. Each indicator is divided into 5 levels and evaluated for suitability by logistics and transportation experts. Moreover, the indicator has been applied to truck service providers that are members of the Thai Logistics for Greater Mekong Subregion Trade Association. It was found that the companies in the Thai Logistics for Greater Mekong Subregion Trade Association have overall logistics efficiency at a very high level, with an average score of 4.88. However, there are some indicators on which service providers should improve their operations. They include drug testing in drivers, loss of fines from traffic violations, and fuel consumption rate of transportation. In addition, transportation service providers could apply the indicators developed from this research for their self-assessment in order to know the level of service efficiency, and also being prepared for requests to certify the standard of truck services quality such as Q-Mark or other standards.

References

Apiprachyasakul, K. (2008). Transportation management. Bangkok: Focus Media and Publishing

Bardi, E. J., Coyle, J. J., & Novack, R. A. (2006). Management of Transportation. Ohio: Thomson/South-Western.

Bowersox, D. J., & Closs, D. J. (1996). Logistics Management. Singapore: McGraw-Hill

Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). (2020). CSCMP Supply Chain Management Definitions and Glossary [On-line]. Available: https://cscmp.org/CSCMP/Educate/SCM_Definitions_and_Glossary_of_Terms.aspx.

Department of Land Transport. (2018). Knowledge Center [On-line]. Available: https://www.dlt.go.th/th/

Department of Land Transport. (2018). Service Quality Standard for Truck Operator Handbook [On-line]. Available: https://www.dlt.go.th/th/

Division of Logistics. (2019). Industrial Logistics Performance Index...Key Success Factor [On-line]. Available: https://dol.dip.go.th/th

ITBSThai. (2007). Definition of Transportation [On-line]. Available: http://www.itbsthai.com/knowledge_detail.php?LID=1&ID=1

Lambert, D. M., Stock, J. R., & Ellram, L. M. (1998). Fundamentals of Logistics Management. Singapore: McGraw-Hill

Logistics Development Strategic Division (2019). Thailand’s Logistics Report 2018. Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. Bangkok.

Logistics Development Strategic Division (2020). Thailand’s Logistics Report 2019. Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. Bangkok.

Office of Service Trade and Trade Logistics. (2016). Criteria for classification of Thai logistics service providers and criteria for measuring the performance of logistics services. Bangkok: Department of International Trade Promotion.

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2013). Thailand’s Logistics Development Strategy No. 2 (2013-2017). Bangkok.

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2017). Thailand’s Logistics Development Strategy No. 3 (2017-2021). Bangkok.

Saleh, S. (2014). Scoring rubrics [On-line]. Available: http://ded.edu.kps.ku.ac.th/192221

Srisa-ard, B. (2013). Preliminary Research. Bangkok: Suweerisarn.

Suthiwartnarueput, K., Bhamornsathit, S., & Duangphastra, C. (2003). Supply chain management and logistics. Bangkok: McGraw-Hill.

Thai Federation on Logistics. (2019). Performance indicators of 5 business types [On-line]. Available: http://www.thailog.org/index.php

Varadejsatitwong, P. (2019). Development of a model for evaluating logistics performance for Thai logistics service providers [On-line]. Available: www.rricongress.com/2018/4261/

Downloads

Published

2020-12-23

Issue

Section

Research Article