CREATIVE LEADERSHIP OF PRIVATE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN PHATTALUNG PROVINCE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research were to: 1) analyze the causal relationship between Building Leadership (BULE), Result-Oriented Leadership (RELE), Risk Management Leadership (RILE), Team Learning Leadership (LELE) and Creative Leadership (CRLE) and 2) test the consistency of the Building Leadership (BULE), Result-Oriented Leadership (RELE), Risk Management Leadership (RILE), Team Learning Leadership (LELE) and Creative Leadership (CRLE) models with empirical data and sample acquisition. The population for this research consisted of teachers in private schools in Phatthalung Province in the 2025 academic year. The sample size was determined based on the criteria of Hair et al. (2010). The sample was obtained using a purposive sampling method. A total of 36 private schools, 12 students per school, totaling 432 students. offering education from pre-primary to high school, with sufficient teachers to collect questionnaire data, were selected. This ensured that the data were comprehensive and appropriately reflected the population characteristics.
The results of the initial model's structural equation model fit test revealed that the model did not align with the empirical data. Considering the = 980.870, df = 124, p-value = < .001,
/ df = 7.910, GFI = 0.732, NFI = 0.924, NNFI = 0.919, CFI = 0.842, RMR = 0.058, SRMR = 0.067, and RMSEA = 0.134, the above statistics show that the p-value < .05 rejects the hypothesis, and all indices did not pass the criteria for consideration. Therefore, it could be concluded that the structural equation model of creative leadership development (CRLE) did not align with the empirical data.
The researchers adjusted the model according to the recommendations of the (MI) program to better align with the empirical data. The results of the adjusted model examination revealed a good fit with the empirical data. The results of the fit test between the structural equation models and the development of creative leadership (CRLE) with empirical data found that the structural equation model of creative leadership (CRLE) was consistent with the empirical data, considering the value of = 2769, df = 1454, p value = 0.061,
/ df = 1.904, GFI index = 0.947, NFI = 0.973, NNFI = 0.978, CFI = 0.969, RMR = 0.049, SRMR = 0.029, RMSEA = 0.003, and = 0.719. From the above statistics, it could be seen that the p value was high enough to accept the hypothesis (p > .05). The various indices passed the criteria for consideration. Therefore, it could be concluded that the structural equation model of creative leadership (CRLE) was consistent with the empirical data. All variables could explain the variance of Creative Leadership Development (CRLE) with achieved 71.90 percent.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
กิตติกร ธรรมกิจวัฒน์. (2562). การพัฒนาโปรแกรมเสริมสร้างภาวะผู้นําเชิงสร้างสรรค์ของผู้บริหารสถานศึกษาเอกชน สังกัดสำนักงานศึกษาธิการจังหวัดบุรีรัมย์.วิทยานิพนธ์การศึกษามหาบัณฑิต. บัณฑิตวิทยาลัย: มหาวิทยาลัยมหาสารคาม.
ทนงศักดิ์ จันทบุรี, ณัฐิยา ตันตรานนท์, เกตุมณี มากมี, และสุเทพ พงศ์ศรีวัฒน์. (2562). การพัฒนาคู่มือฝึกอบรมภาวะผู้นำการเปลี่ยนแปลงของครูแกนนำสู่ชุมชนการเรียนรู้ทางวิชาชีพ. Journal of Education Studies, 47 (Suppl. 2), 111-129.
สำนักงานรับรองมาตรฐานและประเมินคุณภาพการศึกษา (องค์การมหาชน). (2554). การประเมินมาตรฐานการศึกษา: คุณภาพที่ประเทศมุ่งหวัง. กรุงเทพฯ: พริ้นส์เตอร์.
สำนักวิจัยการศึกษาเอกชน. (2563). รายงานสถานการณ์การจัดการศึกษาเอกชนในประเทศไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ.
สุภัทรา สิงห์ทอง. (2564). ปัญหาและแนวทางการพัฒนาครูในโรงเรียนเอกชน. วารสารการบริหารการศึกษา, 12(2), 45-59.
Almazroa, H., & Alotaibi, W. (2023). Teaching 21st century skills: Understanding the depth and width of the challenges to shape proactive teacher education programmes. Sustainability, 15(9), 7365.
Amabile, T. M., & Khaire, M. (2008). Creativity and the role of the leader. Harvard Business Review, 86(10), 100–109.
Ash, R. C., & Persall, J. M. (2000). The principal as chief learning officer: Developing teacher leaders. NASSP bulletin, 84(616), 15-22.
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chen, P., Kee, D. M. H., Tao, X., & Xiao, Y. (2025). Responsible leadership and employee creativity: a moderated mediation model based on social cognitive and situational strength theories. BMC psychology, 13(1), 757.
Day, D. V. (2001). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581–613.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Farzana, S., & Charoensukmongkol, P. (2024). Effects of transformational leadership on psychological empowerment and employee engagement: a comparative study of Bangladesh and Thailand. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 18(4), 1094-1113.
Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109–116.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hillson, D., & Murray-Webster, R. (2017). Understanding and managing risk attitude. Routledge.
Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of risk management. Kogan Page.
House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3(4), 81–97.
Irshad, M., Ziaullah, M., & Hayyat, A. (2023). The Effects of entrepreneurial leadership and transformational leadership on innovative behavior. Global Economics Review, 8(2), 317-333.
Karimi, S., Ahmadi Malek, F., Yaghoubi Farani, A., & Liobikiene, G. (2023). The role of transformational leadership in developing innovative work behaviors: The mediating role of employees’ psychological capital. Sustainability, 15(2), 1267.
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leadership change. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA.
Krause, T. R. (2016). Leading with safety. Wiley.
Li, G., Li, L., Xie, L., & Lopez, O. S. (2024). The effects of ethical leadership on creativity: A conservation of resources perspective. Current Psychology, 43(6), 1-11.
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage.
Puccio, G. J., Mance, M., & Murdock, M. C. (2011). Creative leadership: Skills that drive change. Sage.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
UNESCO. (2021). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. Paris.
