Developing Teaching and Learning Methods using a Research-Based Teaching Strategy in the Digital age to Empower/Enhance Innovators for Undergraduate Students

Main Article Content

Boonsong Kuayngern
Kamolchart Klomim

Abstract

The following are the goals of this study article:   1) to develop and assess the caliber of instructional strategies for undergraduate students in the digital age that use research-based methodologies to cultivate innovators, 2) to test an innovative, research-based curriculum in the digital era to prepare undergraduates to be innovators. The sample group consists of 36 undergraduate general science majors from Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University Faculty of Education. They were selected using a simple random sampling technique that involved a lottery drawing, and the sampling unit was a classroom. The sample group was drawn from the first semester of the academic year 2023. The instruments employed in the study were; 1) one evaluation form for innovation thinking skills, and 2) one innovation performance evaluation form. The study's findings indicate that, in order to develop innovators for undergraduate students, 1) develop and assess the caliber of instructional strategies utilizing research-based procedures in the digital age; 1.1) helping undergraduate students in the digital age become better innovators by creating a research-based instructional model with five components: principles, objectives, content, teaching and learning process, and assessment and evaluation, 1.2) it was established that the research-based processes-based teaching model's applicability in the digital age to strengthen innovators for undergraduate students has the highest level of consistency, and that the model's quality of application to foster innovators in undergraduate students, including the highest level of accuracy, with a mean of 4.87 and a standard deviation of 0.04, and both the applicability of the research-based processes-based teaching model in the digital era to strengthen innovators for undergraduate students has the highest level of consistency, with a mean of 4.87 and a standard deviation of 0.04 from the quality of the model's application to foster innovators in undergraduate students, including the highest level of accuracy, 2) experimenting with research-based teaching methods in the digital era to foster innovators for undergraduate students, it appears that; 2.1) After studying first level, students who employed a research-based teaching technique to improve their ability to solve problems creatively in the digital age demonstrated statistically significant increases in their average scores, and 2.2) students are taught using a research-based approach to empower innovators in the digital age; average scores for innovation work at the .01 level are much higher than the required amount.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย (Research Articles)

References

Bellanca, J. A. (2010). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree Press.

Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M., and McDonald, R. (2015). What Is Disruptive Innovation Twenty Years after the Introduction of the Theory, We Revisit What It Does and Doesn’t Explain. Harvard Business Review Press.

Gregersen, H., Christensen, C. M., and Dyer, J. (2011). The Innovator's DNA. Harvard Business Press.

Hart, S. (2013). Thinking through teaching: A framework for enhancing participation and learning. Rutledge.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., and Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Lee, C., and Benza, R. (2015). Teaching Innovation Skills: Application of Design Thinking in a Graduate Marketing Course. Business Education Innovation Journal, 7(1), 43-50. http://www.beijournal.com/images/V7N1_final.pdf

Phonsawan, P. (2018). Collaborative imaginary engineering model with gamification on cloud society for strengthen innovator characteristics and innovative thinking skills. King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok. [In Thai]

Ruangrong, P., and Pittayasenee, M. (2021). Computational thinking combined with the Coding learning model to promote collaborative problem-solving skills. Graduate Studies Network Journal Northern Rajabhat University, 11(1), 1-16. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JGNRU/article/view/242254/167380 [In Thai].

Saiyot, L., and Saiyot, A. (2010). Educational research techniques (11th ed.). Suviriyasan. [In Thai]

Srisa-at, B. (2013). Basic research (10th ed.). Suviriyasan. [In Thai]

Sudeendra Thirtha Koushik, K.S. (2016). Innovator Skills – A Comparative Analysis A 3-Dimensional Innovation model for business impact. In Research Scholar VTU, RITM, Bangalore, India, 3rd International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research & Practice. (pp. 20-26). Rsisinternational. https://rsisinternational.org/3ICMRP-2016/

-26.pdf

Suwatanpornkul, S. (2008). Research and development of learning management plans that integrate local content using a research-based process to develop life skills for primary school students. Chulalongkorn University. [In Thai]

Weyrauch, T., and Herstatt, C. (2016). What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria. Journal of Frugal Innovation, 2(1), 1-17. https://DOI:10.1186/s40669-016-0005-y

Wisetsat, C. (2019). Development of learning models to promote innovative thinking skills of teaching professional students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Mahasarakham University. [In Thai]

Wheeler, J. (2006). The Power of Innovative Thinking: Let New Ideas Lead You to Success. Career Press Inc.