Designing Effective Pedagogical Approaches with Next-Generation LMS for Students in Higher Education

Main Article Content

Thanomporn Laohajaratsang

Abstract

This research examines a selection of academic articles, existing evidence, and early indications of newly-designed Learning Management System (LMS) tools/functions, and then analyzes and synthesizes the concepts to form a thorough description of the components within the concept of next-generation LMS. The comparison of conventional LMS and next-generation LMS was undertaken by considering nine issues. The result of the examination identified six major components of next-generation LMS including 1) Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI)/other integration standards 2) analytics, advice and learning assessment 3) social media design formats, such as Facebook wall format, posting, “like”, e-portfolio, and others 4) mobile-first attributes/smart phone elements of content and functionality 5) game components/rewards for motivation, and 6) Artificial Intelligence (AI) functions. Among major LMS platforms, CourseNetworking was selected as the best example of a next-generation learning platform and the research tool to design an effective learning approaches model around it. A qualitative finding related to next-generation LMS (CourseNetworking) usage is reported. Data from the interviews supports the concept of the six major attributes of next-generation LMS. Lastly, the research focuses on an effective pedagogical approaches model for next-generation LMS, based upon two prevailing methods, personal learning environment (PLE) with self-regulated learning and socially-mediated learning.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Thanomporn Laohajaratsang, Chiang Mai University

Dr. Thanomporn Laohajaratsang is the consultant of the Information Technology Service Center and an Associate Professor in the Department of Learning Technology, Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Her research interests include digital innovation in teaching and learning, integration of ICT educational system and design of future learning environments.

References

Anderson, T. (2012). Networks, Web 2.0, and the connected learner. In R.A. Reiser & J.V. Dempsey
(Eds.), Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (pp. 299-308). Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
Anderson, T. (2016). Theories for Learning with Emerging Technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.),
Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning (pp. 35-50). AU Press: Athabasca University.
Arenas, E. (2008). Personal Learning Environment: Implication and Challenges. Retrieved
September 8, 2016 from, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255649578_PERSONAL_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS_IMPLICATIONS_AND_CHALLENGES.
Attwell, G. (2006). Social software, personal learning environments and lifelong competence development. Retrieved January 9, 2016 from, https://www.scribd.com/document/24892900/Social-Software-Personal-Learning-Environments-and-Lifelong-Competence-Development-Graham-Attwell.
Attwell, G. (2007). "e-Portfolios – the DNA of the Personal Learning Environment?" Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society 3(2), 39-61.
Baker, J. (2017). Updating the Next Generation Digital Learning Environment for Better Student
Learning Outcomes. Educause Review. July/August 2017. Retrieved September 8, 2017 from,
https://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/articles/2017/7/erm17413.pdf.
Brown, J.S., & Adler, R.P. (2008). Mind on fire: Open education the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0.
Educause Quarterly, 42(6), 16-32.
Brown, M., Dehoney, J., & Millichap, M. (2015). Educause Review. May/June 2015. What ‘s Next
for the LMS? Retrieved August 24, 2016 from, https://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/6/whats-next-
for-the-lms.
Buchem, I., Attwell, G., & Torres, R. (2011). Understanding personal learning environments:
Literature review and synthesis through the activity theory lens. Retrieved January 5, 2015 from,
https://www.scribd.com/document/62828883/Understanding-Personal-Learning-Environments-
Literature-review-and-synthesis-through-the-Activity-Theory-lens.
Carter, T., & Nugent, J. (2011). Personal learning networks: Implications for self-directed learning in
the digital age. In V. Wang (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Communication Technologies and
Adult Education Integration (pp.226-240). Hershey, PA.
Cifuentes, L., Alvarez Xochihua, O., & Edwards, J. (2011). Learning in Web 2.0 environments:
Surface learning and chaos or deep learning and self-regulation? Quarterly Review of Distance
Education, 12(1), 1-21.
Conde, M., Franciso, J., García-Peñalvo, M., Rodrí guez-Conde, M., Alier, M.. & Piguillem, J.
(2014). An evolving Learning Management System for new educational environments using 2.0
tools. Interactive Learning Environments. 22(2), 188-204.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). "Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-
regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning." The Internet
and Higher Education 15(1), 3-8.
Dabbagh, N., & Reo, R. (2011). Impact of Web 2.0 on higher education. In D. W. Surry, T. Stefurak,
& R. Gray (Eds.), Technology Integration in Higher Education: Social and Organizational
Aspects (pp. 174–187). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Dede, C. (2008). Theoretical perspectives influencing the use of information technology in teaching
and learning. In J. Voogt and G. Knezek (Eds.), International Handbook of Information
Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, 43-62. New York: Springer.
Downes, S. (2005). E-Learning 2.0. E-Learning Magazine. Retrieved November 10, 2017 from,
http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1104968.
Downes, S. (2006). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Instructional Technology Forum.
Retrieved July 18, 2018 from https://www.tonybates.ca/2008/07/21/learning-networks-and-connective-knowledge%E2%80%99-instructional-technology-forum/
Feldstein, M. (2017a). A flexible, interoperable digital learning platform: Are we there yet? E-Literate
posted on May 28, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2017 from, http://mfeldstein.com/flexible-
interoperable-digital-learning-platform-yet/.
Feldstein, M. (2017b). Monday July 13, 2017. Educause Review. What is the Next Generation?
Retrieved September 5, 2017 from, https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/7/what-is-the-next-
generation.
Fournier, H., & Kop, R. (2010). Researching the design and development of a personal learning
environment. Paper presented at the 2010 PLE Conference. Retrieved October 5, 2017 from
http://pleconference.citilab.eu/cas/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/ple2010_submission_88.pdf.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Alier, M. (2014). Learning management system: Evolving from silos to
structures. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 143-145.
Harasim, L. (1999). A framework for Online-Learning: The Virtual-U. Computer 32(9), 44-49.
Hart, J. (2013). My daily PKM routine (practices and toolset). Retrieved 03/05/2017 from
http://www.c4lpt.co.uk/blog/2013/11/30/my-daily-pkm-routine-practices-and-toolset/.
Henri, F. & Chalier, B. (2010). Personal learning environment: A concept, an application, or a self-
designed instrument? Paper presented at the International Conference on 9th Information
Technology-Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 2010, Retrieved January 5, 2015
from, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5480062/?reload=true.
Hill, P. (2017). State of Higher Ed LMS Market for US and Canada: Spring 2017 Edition. E-Literate
posted on May 15, 2017. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from, http://mfeldstein.com/state-higher-
ed-lms-market-us-canada-spring-2017-edition/.
Jafari, A. (2017). Code Name: Rumi Agent. Retrieved November 15, 2017 from,
https://cyberlab.iupui.edu/Current%20Projects/Rumi%20Agent%20Project/index.html.
Jafari A., & Baylor A. (2012). From course management to course networking: Conceptualizing a
new learning environment based on social networking. Retrieved September 5, 2017 from,
https://www.thecn.com/document/CN_white_paper_v1-1.0_final.pdf.
Jarche, H. (2014). The Seek>Sense>Share>Framework. Inside Learning Technologies. Retrieved
March 5, 2017 from, http://jarche.com/2014/02/the-seek-sense-share-framework.
Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2010). Learning to Learn with Integrative Learning Technologies
(ILT): A Practical Guide for Academic Success. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Marra, R.M., & Jonassen, D.H. (2001). Limitations of online courses for supporting constructive
learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(4), 303-317.
Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal Learning Environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.),
Emerging Technologies in Distance Education (pp. 177-193). Edmonton: Athabasca University
Press.
Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2016). Issues in Research, Design, and Development of Personal
Learning Environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging and Innovation in Digital Learning
(pp. 119-141). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
Mayes, T. & de Freitas (2013) Technology-enhanced learning: The role of theory. In H. Beetham &
R. Sharpe (Eds). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st century learning (2nd
ed., pp 20-29). New York, NY: Routledge.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalized and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era:
International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of
Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43.
Mott J., & Wiley D. (2009). Open for Learning: The CMS and the Open Learning Network. E in
Education. Volume 15 No. 2. Retrieved November 20, 2016 from,
http://ineducation.ca/ineducation/article/view/53/529.
Open Academic Environment (OAE) (2017). Retrieved September 15, 207 from,
http://oaeproject.org/assets/pdf/OAE_Vision_2017.pdf.
Schon, S., & Hilzeinsaur, W. (2008). On the Way towards Personal Learning Environments: Seven
crucial aspects. Retrieved October 11, 2016 from, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28264175_On_the_way_towards_Personal_Learning_Environments_Seven_crucial_aspects.
Siemens, G. (2007). PLEs- I, acronym, therefore I exist. Elearnspace: learning, networks, knowledge,
technology, community (Blog Post) Retrieved from,
http://elearnspace.org/blog/archives/002884.html.
Straumsheim, C. (2015). Brick by Brick: Educause releases a blueprint for next-generation learning
management systems, recommending a “Lego approach. Retrieved October 11, 2016 from,
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/05/11/educause-releases-blueprint-next-generation-
learning-management-systems.
The New Media Consortium (2015). Next Generation LMS. Retrieved October 2, 2017 from,
https://www.nmc.org/horizon_topic/next-generation-lms/#_edn4.
Turker, M., & Zingel, S. (2008). Formative interfaces for scaffolding self-regulated learning in PLEs. eLearning papers. Retrieved March 7, 2016 from, http://www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media15975.pdf.
Valjataga, T., Pata, K., & Tammets, K. (2011). Considering students’ perspective on personal and
distributed learning environments. In M.J.W. Lee & McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0-based E-
Learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching (pp.85-107). Hershey: PA, IGI Global.
Van Harmelen, M (2006). Personal Learning Environments. In R. Kindshuk, P. Koper, P. Kommers,
D.Kirschner, W. Didderen & Sampson, D. (Eds.), Proceeding of the Sixth International
Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 815-816). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE
Computer Society.
Weiss, C. (2015). Top 10 Next Gen for LMSs for 2015-1016. Report from the Craig Weiss Blog.
Retrieved September 20, 2017 from, https://elearninfo247.com/2015/09/03/top10nextgen1516/.
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-regulatory cycles of learning. In G. A. Straka (Ed.), Conceptions of Self-
directed Learning, Theoretical and Conceptual Considerations (pp. 221). Routledge: New York.