Optimizing Online English Language Teaching: A Post-COVID Exploration of Teaching Presence through the Lens of Thai EFL Undergraduates
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
During COVID-19, online education was utilized globally to bridge geographical and temporal gaps; however, this posed new challenges. In this context, instructors continued to play a crucial role in shaping students’ educational experiences and promoting student achievement. Consequently, addressing the issues that can help students adapt to significant educational changes is essential. One of the greatest challenges is identifying the new normal that will enable students and instructors to adapt to a post-COVID world. This study examined the most and least preferred indicators of teaching presence within the Community of Inquiry framework, and students’ perceptions and expectations regarding their contributions to a successful online learning experience. This study was conducted with the participation of 124 university students. Self-report questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were employed to collect data using a mix-method approach. According to the results, the most positive indicators for online students were related to clear communication—particularly regarding course topics. The least desirable indicator of teaching presence was the establishment of a learning climate. Despite difficulties such as a lack of motivation, online distractions, feelings of loneliness and isolation, online fatigue, and information overload, online learners acknowledged the importance of student-teacher relationships. This study demonstrates that online instructors can establish and sustain a strong teaching presence by communicating clearly and fostering a supportive rapport with their students. It is hoped that the findings of this study will contribute to the enhancement of the quality of online education and increase meaningful online learning experiences.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Materials in THAITESOL JOURNAL may be photocopied for educational purposes. Under no circumstances may any part of this journal be photocopied for commercial purposes.
References
Abidin, N. S. Z., Zamani, N. F. M., Kenali, S. F. M., Kamarulzaman, M. H., Soopar, A. A., & Rahmat, N. H. (2023). Exploring the relationship between teaching, cognitive presence and social presence in online learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(5), 1456–1474.
Adarkwah, M. A. (2020). “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1665–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z
Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45–51.
https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.2020261309
Boettcher, J. V., & Conrad, R. M. (2021). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. John Wiley & Sons.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chang, C. S., Chen, T. S., & Hsu, W. H. (2011). The study on integrating WebQuest with mobile learning for environmental education. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.005
DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage publications.
Duangpummet, P., & Chenprakhon, P. (2021). Students’ perceptions of a designed online asynchronous learning activity regarding the Community of Inquiry (COI) Framework. Proceedings of the Osaka Conference on Education 2020. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2436- 1690.2021.9.
Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2– 3), 87–105.
Grothaus, C. (2022). Collaborative online learning across cultures: The role of teaching and social presence. Qualitative Research in Education, 11(3), 298–326.
Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6923–6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Husin, M. S., Yusof, M. M., Jaapar, W. E., & Zuraina, S. (2023). Is there a relationship between all types of presence in online group work? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(5), 2791–2805.
Kapasia, N., Paul, P., Roy, A., Saha, J., Zaveri, A., Mallick, R., Barman, B., Das, P., &
Chouhan, P. (2020). Impact of lockdown on learning status of undergraduate and
postgraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic in West Bengal, India. Children
and Youth Services Review, 116, 105194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105194
Laksana, D. N. (2020). Implementation of online learning in the pandemic covid-19: Student perception in areas with minimum internet access. Journal of Education Technology 4, 502– 509. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i4.29314
Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., Karpinski, A. C., & Singh, S. (2019). College students’ multitasking behavior in online versus face-to-face courses. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018824505
Liang, J. (2023). The relationship of teaching clarity and student academic motivation in online classes. Pupil: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 7(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2023.71.4856
Martin, F., Wu, T., Wan, L., & Xie, K. (2022). A meta-analysis on the Community of Inquiry
presence and learning outcomes in online and blended learning environment. Online Learning, 26(1), 325–359.
Nishimwe, G., Kamali, S., Gatesi, E., & Wong, R. (2022). Assessing the perceptions and preferences between online and in-person classroom learning among university students in Rwanda. Journal of Service Science and Management, 15(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2022.151003
Pham, C. K., Huynh, C. Q., Dang, M. D., Thai, T. B., & Tran, T. H. (2021). Interrelationship among Social, Teaching, and Cognitive Presences through Students’ Online Learning Experience. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 9(36), 163–172.
Rahiem, M. D. H. (2020). The emergency remote learning experience of university students in Indonesia amidst the COVID-19 Crisis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.1
Roksa, J., Trolian, T. L., Blaich, C., & Wise, K. (2016). Facilitating academic performance in college: Understanding the role of clear and organized instruction. Higher Education, 74(2), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0048-2
Shea, P., Sau Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
Suwinyattichaiporn, T., Johnson, Z. D., & Fontana, J. (2019). Investigating the influence of student–teacher Facebook interaction in Thailand. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(5), 391–404.
Tang, T., Abuhmaid, A. M., Olaimat, M., Oudat, D. M., Aldhaeebi, M., & Bamanger, E. (2020). Efficiency of flipped classroom with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1077–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817761c
Ulla, M. B., & Nguyen, Q. N. (2022). Teaching presence during the COVID-19 pandemic: Practices of EAP teachers in a Thai university. In Cases on Teaching English for Academic Purposes (EAP) during COVID-19: Insights from Around the World (pp. 28–51). IGI Global.