Evidential Shifts in EFL Manuscripts: A Study of Novice Writers Across Three Diverse Learning Contexts
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the use of evidentials in the Independent Study (IS) manuscripts of EFL undergraduates across three learning contexts: onsite, online, and hybrid. The analysis reveals significant shifts in the use of evidentials, particularly during the online and hybrid phases, reflecting how these contexts influence academic writing practices. There is a notable increase in the use of reporting evidentials, especially the verb + that structure, during the online and hybrid phases, which indicates a growing emphasis on academic credibility and transparency. Commonly used reporting verbs, such as show, find, and reveal, highlight students' increasing focus on supporting their claims with authoritative sources. The balance between self-reporting and other-reporting evidentials suggests a rise in students' confidence in asserting their own contributions, especially in the more autonomous online learning context. The use of human, non-human, and concealed sources reflects a nuanced understanding of agency, with an increased focus on human experiences and perspectives during the online phase. The analysis also demonstrates how students adopt a more analytical approach with low and medium-value modals, such as inferring evidentials, suggesting a stronger assertion of their findings and viewpoints. Additionally, the Literature Review remains a central area for evidential application, underscoring its importance in integrating and attributing scholarly sources. Overall, the study highlights the evolving use of evidentials across different learning contexts and emphasizes the need for targeted pedagogies to enhance EFL students' academic writing proficiency, enabling them to participate more effectively in academic conversations and contribute meaningfully to their fields.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Materials in THAITESOL JOURNAL may be photocopied for educational purposes. Under no circumstances may any part of this journal be photocopied for commercial purposes.
References
Aga, S. S., & Nissar, S. (2022). Essential guide to manuscript writing for academic dummies: An editor’s perspective. Biochemistry Research International, 2022, Article ID 1492058, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1492058
Alhaider, S. M. (2023). Teaching and learning the four English skills before and during the COVID-19 era: Perceptions of EFL faculty and students in Saudi higher education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(19), 1–19. https://sfleducation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40862-023-00193-6
Al Rawashdeh, A. Z., Mohammed, E. Y., Al Arab, A. R., Alara, M., & Al-Rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: Analyzing students’ perspectives. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(2), 107–117. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1296879.pdf
Anthony, L. (2024). AntConc (Version 4.3.1) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Bensalem, E., Harizi, R., & Boujlida, A. (2024). Exploring undergraduate students' usage and perceptions of AI writing tools. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 14, 53-65. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v14i2.9344
Boonmoh, A., Jumpakate, T., Saengmanee, S., & Rungkaew, T. (2022). Integration of technology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experience, challenges, and needs of Thai EFL teachers. rEFLections, 29(2), 251–277. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/259346/174492
Borg, E. (2000). Citation practices in academic writing. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Patterns and perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practice (pp. 26–42). Reading, UK: Centre for Applied Language Studies.
Bucăţa, G., & Baboş, A. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of onsite learning compared to online learning. Scientific Bulletin, 28(1), 14–15. https://intapi.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/bsaft-2023-0002
Burneikaitė, N. (2006). Evidentiality in graduate student writing: A study of Lithuanian students’ master’s theses in English. Kalba ir kontekstai, 1, 97–105.
Butson, R., John, S., & Suazo, A. (2020). The behaviour of learning: Exploring independent study practices of undergraduate health science students. Medical Science Educator, 30(2), 917–925. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8368362/
Chafe, W. L., & Nichols, J. (Eds.). (1986). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Ablex.
Dehkordi, M. E., & Allami, H. (2012). Evidentiality in academic writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(9), 1895–1904. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol02/09/18.pdf
Dontchewa-Navratilova, O. (2021). Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003
Dressel, P. L., & Thompson, M. M. (1973). Independent study. Jossey-Bass.
Dzulhaili, M., Junaidi, M., & Gufron. (2021). Metadiscourse in academic writing: Corpus-based analysis. Linguistics and English Languages Teaching Studies, 2(1), 65–79.
Eckstein, G., Rawlins, J., Taylor, H., Briggs, H., Candland, A., & Hanks, E. (2022). Reporting verb variation across disciplines: An academic corpus study. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 16(1), 59–75.
Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in second language: Person, task, context and strategies. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (TESL-EJ), 7(2), 1–25. https://tesl-ej.org/ej26/a4.html
Guo, J. (2019). A contrastive study of evidentiality in English and Chinese MA thesis abstracts. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 378, 524–531.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Journal of Social Issues, 11(3), 245–258.
Hu, G., & Wang, G. (2014). Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001
Hu, Z. L. (1994). Evidentiality in language. Foreign Languages Teaching and Research, 1, 9–15.
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
Jianghong, C. (2023). A study on evidentiality in the abstract part of learners’ English academic papers. Sino-US English Teaching, 20(6), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2023.06.003
Kapranov, O. (2023). Evidentiality in argumentative essays by upper-intermediate EFL students. Мова кодифікація компетенція комунікація, 1(8), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/lccc-2023-0004
Kapranov, O. (2024). Reporting verbs associated with evidentiality in research article abstracts in applied linguistics and applied psycholinguistics. Linguistica Pragensia, 34(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.14712/18059635.2024.2.3
Kaufhold, K. (2015). L2 student articulation of epistemic stance in disciplinary writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 125–134.
Kazu, İ. Y., & Yalçın, C. K. (2022). Investigation of the effectiveness of hybrid learning on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 249–265. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1332714.pdf
Koh, J. H. L., & Daniel, B. K. (2022). Shifting online during COVID-19: A systematic review of teaching and learning strategies and their outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(56), 1–23. https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-022-00361-7
Kuhi, D., Yavari, M., & Azar, A. S. (2012). Metadiscourse in applied linguistics research articles: A cross-sectional survey. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(11), 405–414. https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/11402
Ling, M., & Elgort, I. (2023). New types of evidence in online learning spaces: A corpus-based study. RELC Journal, 54(2), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231175236
MacIntyre, R. (2020). Citation machines: The use of evidentials in the academic writing of Japanese university students. In S. Consonni, L. D’Angelo, & P. Anesa (Eds.), Digital communication and metadiscourse: Changing perspectives in academic genres (pp. 59–74). Centro di Ricerca sui Linguaggi Specialistici.
Humanities and Language Division. (n.d.). Independent project. Mahidol University International College. https://muic.mahidol.ac.th/eng/programs/undergraduate-programs/humanities-and-language/independent-project/
Mehta, S., Suto, I., Elliott, G., & Rushton, N. (2013). Independent research at A level: Students’ and teachers’ experiences. Research Matters, 15, 9–16. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/468197-independent-research-at-a-level-students-and-teachers-experiences.pdf
Nacke, L. (2023, July 4). Seven crucial academic writing elements. Write Insight Newsletter. https://lennartnacke.com/7-crucial-academic-writing-elements/
Nesler, M. S., Meade, R. J., & Duffy, M. K. (1993). The effect of credibility on perceived power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(12), 1407–1425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01040.x
O’Sullivan, M. K., & Dallas, K. B. (2010). A Collaborative approach to implementing 21st Century skills in a high school senior research class. Education Libraries, 33(1), 3–9. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ887229.pdf
Ouhaichi, H., Spikol, D., & Vogel, B. (2023). Research trends in multimodal learning analytics: A systematic mapping study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100136
Pearson, W. S., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2023). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A systematic review. Lingua, 293, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103561
Rungwaraphong, P. (2012). Student readiness for learner autonomy: Case study at a university in Thailand. Asian Journal on Education and Learning, 3(2), 28–40. https://www.thaiscience.info/journals/Article/AJEL/10836621.pdf
Serrano, R., Llanes, À., & Tragant, E. (2011). Analyzing the context of second language learning: Domestic intensive and semi-intensive courses vs. study abroad in Europe. System, 39(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.05.002
Shrestha, L., Joshi, B., & Kumar, A. (2021). Writing a research paper: A guide. Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences, 9(1), 76–81, https://doi.org/10.3126/jucms.v9i01.37987
Toomnan, P. (2024). The impact of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic on language learning strategies, proficiency, and enjoyment among Thai EFL students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 19(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v19i01.46401
Wang, C., & Li, J. (2024). Comparative analysis of evidentiality in spoken and written academic discourse. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 6(3), p. 62–86. https://doi.org/10.22158/eltls.v6n3p62
Yang, L. (2013). Evaluative functions of reporting evidentials in English research articles of applied linguistics. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2013.32016
Yang, L. (2014). Evidentiality in English research articles of applied linguistics: From the perspective of metadiscourse. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3), 581–591. https://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/jltr/vol05/03/13.pdf
Yang, L., & Tian, Y. (2015). A cross-disciplinary study of evidentiality in abstracts of English research articles. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5(4), 1–13. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=59184