Translating Cultural Heritage for Global Audience: A Study of Developing and Delivering English Narration for Thai Classical Performances

Article Sidebar

Download
Published: Sep 28, 2026
Keywords:
Thai classical performances English narration cultural translation intercultural communication cultural heritage

Main Article Content

Tanonrat Naktang
Burapha University (Chanthaburi Campus), Chanthaburi, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5525-5254
Manit Theppatimaporn
Burapha University (Bangsaen Campus), Chonburi, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9886-8977
Steven J. Bodley
Burapha University (Chanthaburi Campus), Chanthaburi, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1114-8550
Yarnawut Traisuwan
Bunditpatanasilpa Institute of Fine Arts, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5565-6388
Sutthisin Suksabai
Suratthani Rajabhat University, Surat Thani, Thailand
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0179-6840

Abstract

Thai classical performance, known as Natayasinthai, is a vibrant part of Thailand’s cultural heritage, closely woven into Thai life and continually evolving in response to political, administrative, and socio-economic changes. This qualitative research investigates the development and delivery of English narration for Thai classical performances staged domestically and internationally. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 purposively selected key informants, comprising five Thai classical performance specialists and five experienced English narration professionals. Data triangulation and content analysis identified two key themes: 1) Culturally Grounded Script Development, which involves accurate translation and meaning equivalence, the use of authentic source narratives, collaboration among cultural and language specialists, and consideration of audience characteristics; and 2) Audience-Centered Narration Delivery, which emphasizes audience comprehension, appropriate pronunciation, script quality, and narrator expertise. The findings indicate that English narration for Thai classical performances requires an integrated approach that connects culturally appropriate script development with audience-oriented delivery. The study highlights the role of English narration as a form of intercultural mediation that can make culturally embedded meanings accessible to international audiences while maintaining the authenticity of Thai classical performance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Naktang, T., Theppatimaporn, M., Bodley, S. J., Traisuwan, Y., & Suksabai, S. (2026). Translating Cultural Heritage for Global Audience: A Study of Developing and Delivering English Narration for Thai Classical Performances . THAITESOL Journal, 39(2), 126–150. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaitesoljournal/article/view/282248
Issue
Vol. 39 No. 2 (2026): July–December (In progress)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Materials in THAITESOL JOURNAL may be photocopied for educational purposes. Under no circumstances may any part of this journal be photocopied for commercial purposes.

Author Biographies

Tanonrat Naktang, Burapha University (Chanthaburi Campus), Chanthaburi, Thailand

Tanonrat Naktang, an assistant professor of English at Burapha University, specializes in translation approach for English as a foreign language learning. He integrates translation-based activity into English for Specific Purposes, especially in Thai classical performances and cross-cultural communication.

Manit Theppatimaporn, Burapha University (Bangsaen Campus), Chonburi, Thailand

Manit Theppatimaporn, an assistant professor in Dance at Burapha University, specializes in Thai classical and traditional choreography, costume and makeup design, and creates performance-based innovations blending cultural heritage with education, therapy, and community development with over a decade of experience in Thai traditional, classical, and contemporary dance.

Steven J. Bodley, Burapha University (Chanthaburi Campus), Chanthaburi, Thailand

Steven J. Bodley, a native English lecturer at Burapha University, specializes in business and academic English communication. With extensive experience in higher education and professional training, he has contributed significantly to English proficiency assessment as an IELTS examiner for the Speaking and Writing components, ensuring international standards in language evaluation and effective communication.

Yarnawut Traisuwan, Bunditpatanasilpa Institute of Fine Arts, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

Yarnawut Traisuwan, a lecturer in Performing Arts at Bunditpatanasilpa Institute of Fine Arts, specializes in Thai traditional and classical Khon performance, particularly giant demon (yak) roles. His expertise includes preserving classical Khon choreography while adapting its foundational elements — gesture, posture, and symbolism — for contemporary productions, bridging heritage with innovation in Thai masked dance theatre.

Sutthisin Suksabai, Suratthani Rajabhat University, Surat Thani, Thailand

Sutthisin Suksabai, an assistant professor of ELT at Suratthani Rajabhat University, specializes in English for academic and occupational purposes. He integrates technology and innovative pedagogy to enhance learners’ skills. His research includes TPACK-based instruction, CEFR-aligned activities, and digital media for grammar learning.

References

Borisutdhi, P. (1999). Theory and practice of translation (3rd ed.). Royal Institute.

Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Boonsong, P. (2017). The persistence of Thai classical dance in the era of Thailand 4.0. Journal of Social Communication Innovation, 5(1), 107–116. https://jsi.rsu.ac.th/Journals/40024a29-1b15-4e4d-8c7b-160758eb51b5

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.

Chanate, P. (2018). Developing the art of speaking in community with Buddhist psychology power 5. Journal of MCU Humanities Review, 4(2), 65–74. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/human/article/view/173760

Chanvisatlak, P. (2017). Backpack journalist. Journal of Journalism, 10(3), 303–312. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jcmag/article/view/164955

Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.

Duff, A. (1989). Translation. Oxford University Press.

Dutt, M. N. (2013). Ramayana of Valmiki: Sanskrit text with English translation. Parimal Publications.

English Language Institute. (2014). A new approach to teaching English aligned with the international English language proficiency standards: Primary education. Office of the Basic Education Commission.

Finocchiaro, M., & Brumfit, C. (1983). The functional-notional approach: From theory to practice. Oxford University Press.

Hall, E. T. (1989). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.

Harding, K. (2007). English for specific purposes. Oxford University Press.

House, J. (2015). Translation quality assessment: Past and present. Routledge.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.

Iamkrasin, S. (2023). Writing scripts and camera angles. Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University.

Jitaree, T. (2005). Be a translator and conquer the world: Translating English to Thai and Thai to English. Amarin Printing & Publishing.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Lertjanyarak, O. (2015). Principle of TV script-writing (7th ed.). Thammasat University Press.

Mackay, R., & Mountford, A. J. (1978). English for specific purposes. Longman.

Makpa, P. (2012). Synthesizing research on Thai classical dance. Journal of the Institute for Culture & the Arts (Humanities & Social Sciences), Srinakharinwirot University, 14(1), 112–117. http://fofa.swu.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/attch/scobus/5765-Article_Text-10887-1-10-0130207.pdf

Mallikamas, P. (2013). Translation and English language teaching (3rd ed.). Chulalongkorn University Press.

Munby, H. (1982). Analyzing teaching for intellectual independence. University Press of America.

Namwong, O. (2011). Active 3Ps: Transforming the teacher’s role in learning management. Journal of Educational Sciences, Khon Kaen University, 34(3–4), 1–9.

Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Phoenix ELT.

Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a science of translating. E.J. Brill.

Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1982). The theory and practice of translation. E.J. Brill.

Nitsamer, S. (2008). Writing for radio and television (4th ed.). Ramkhamhaeng University Press.

Phetchawattana, C. (2016). Thai translation practices in the 21st century. Journal of Translation and Interpreting, 1(1), 16–49. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JTIT/article/view/228244

Pinitphuwadol, S. (2000). Professional translator’s handbook. Nanmee Books.

Pinmanee, S. (2003). Translation 1. Faculty of Humanities, Chiang Mai University.

Prachakul, N. (1997). The science of translation: Theoretical and practical essays. Translation Center, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University.

Rattanasimakul, K. (2012). Principles of writing radio and television scripts. Chulalongkorn University.

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.

Rodsawang, S. (2018). Guidelines for writing full-screen sign language television scripts for the hearing-impaired. Journal of Communication Arts, Dhurakij Pundit University, 12(2), 325–355.

Royal Institute. (2020). Guidelines for phonetic transcription of Thai into Romanized script. Royal Society of Thai.

Ruankam, T., & Chuenchaichon, Y. (2016). A survey of perceptions of English for specific purposes at Bungphra Commercial Collage, Phitsanulok. Lampang Rajabhat University Journal, 5(2), 77–94. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JLPRU/article/view/73346

Saengboon, S. (2012). Teaching English as a foreign language: Past to present. Pasaa Paritat, 27, 89–103. https://www.culi.chula.ac.th/Images/asset/pasaa_paritat_journal/file-27-173-leiya102082.pdf

Saibua, S. (2021). Principles of translation (10th ed.). Thammasat University Press.

Saiseub, T. (2003). Teaching document on television program production. Faculty of Education, Naresuan University.

Spratt, M., Pulverness, A., & Williams, M. (2005). The TKT course: Teaching knowledge test. Cambridge University Press.

Srijinda, P. K. (2018). Marketing communication of Thai digital television stations in their initial stage. Sripatum Chonburi Academic Journal, 15(2), 50–60. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SCAJ/article/view/143577

Suntornsawate, P. (2018). Teaching English for specific purposes (ESP) in the 21st century. Journal of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University, 14(2), 1–26. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jla_ubu/article/view/242327

Thanh, M. T. T. (2016). A survey on problems in studying ESP faced by the IT students at South-East Vocational College, Dong Nai Province, Vietnam. Humanising Language Teaching, 18(1). http://old.hltmag.co.uk/feb16/mart06.htm

Thaweerath, P. (1997). Research methods in behavioral and social sciences. Educational and Psychological Testing Bureau, Srinakharinwirot University.

Tsao, C. H. (2011). English for specific purposes in the EFL context: A survey of student and faculty perceptions. Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 125–149.

Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford University Press.

Wittayarat, S. (2022). Writing for film. Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University.

Yaisomanang, S. (2018). English-to-Thai translation: Course materials for 22336159 English–Thai translation. English Department, Burapha University.

Yongyut, N. (2014). Writing for television. https://natheeyongyut.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/vdo-unit7.pdf

Xu, Y.-Z. (1999). A new ESP course in the present Chinese context. English for Specific Purposes, 18(Supplement 1), S57–S74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00010-1