A Study on the Evaluation of College Students' SPOC Learning Engagement Based on Structural Equation Modeling : Taking the Course "Marketing" as an Example
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this study were: 1) to study the characteristics and elements of student learning engagement patterns under the blended learning model based on the SPOC digital platform; 2) to construct an evaluation model suitable for SPOC learning engagement; and 3) to evaluate the effectiveness of the SPOC learning engagement evaluation model in assisting the achievement of teaching effects. The study population consisted of 209,000 undergraduate students majoring in marketing nationwide. To ensure accuracy, the estimated percentage in the population was magnified by 10%, and a stratified sampling method was used to select 1,080 students as the sample group for the scale. To ensure the scale's effectiveness, five interviewees were selected as interview experts, required to be engaged in university education and teaching management, and to have at least 10 years of teaching experience in business administration-related majors, including teaching research and teaching reform.
Data analysis indicates that the SPOC learning engagement SEM evaluation model comprises four dimensions and 15 elements: behavioral, interactive, emotional, and cognitive engagement. By intervening in the teaching process, the model effectively supports the achievement of teaching objectives.
It is recommended that future research extend the application of this evaluation model to other course types and educational levels, and that instructors use its behavioral, interactive, emotional, and cognitive engagement dimensions as actionable indicators for early intervention in blended SPOC teaching.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- บทความหรือข้อคิดเห็นใดๆ ในวารสารคุณภาพชีวิตกับกฎหมายเป็
- กองบรรณาธิการไม่สงวนสิทธิ์
References
Axelson R. D., Flick A. (2011). Defining student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2011.533096.
Dixson M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1744.
Duncan K., Kenworthy A., McNamara R. (2012). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous participation on students’ performance in online accounting courses. Accounting Education, 21(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2012.673387.
Gao J. (2016). Zaixian xueye qingxu dui xuesheng touru de yingxiang—Shehui renzhi lilun de shijiao [The influence of online academic emotions on learning engagement: A social cognitive theory perspective]. Kaifang Jiaoyu Yanjiu (Open Education Research), 22(2), 89–95.
Gunuc S., Kuzu, A. (2015). Student engagement scale: Development, reliability, and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.938019.
Kong D. (2019). Research on the learning behavior engagement model for SPOC [Master’s thesis, Central China Normal University].
Kong Q. (2000). “Xuesheng touru” de gainian neihan yu jiegou [The concept, connotation and structure of “student engagement”]. Waiguo Jiaoyu Ziliao (Foreign Education Materials), (2), 72–76.
Kuh G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099.
Newmann F. M. (Ed.). (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. Teachers College Press.
Schaufeli W. B., Martínez I. M., Marques-Pinto A., Salanova M., Bakker A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003.
Wu F., Zhang Q. (2018). Xuexi xingwei touru: Dingyi, fenxi kuangjia yu lilun moxing [Learning behavior engagement: Definition, analytical framework and theoretical model]. Zhongguo Dianhua Jiaoyu (China Educational Technology), (1), 35–41.
Yang C. (2014). A study on the evaluation of learning quality of students in higher vocational education [Master’s thesis, Tianjin University].
Yin R., Xu H. (2017). Zaixian xuexi touru jiegou moxing de goujian: Jiyu jiegou fangcheng moxing de shizheng fenxi [Construction of an engagement structural model for online learning: An empirical analysis based on structural equation modeling]. Kaifang Jiaoyu Yanjiu (Open Education Research), 23(4), 101–111.
