Internal Quality Assurance Model for Small Schools

Main Article Content

Jaruwan Natun

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) synthesize the results of external quality assessment of small schools, 2) construct an internal quality assurance model of small schools, and 3) examine and evaluate the usefulness of the internal quality assurance model of small schools. This research was qualitative. The samples used in the study were small schools in the development network of the Faculty of Education, Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, academic year 2023, that voluntarily participated in the project, totaling 10 schools. The informants were 10 school administrators and 10 academic teachers, obtained by purposive size determination. There were 7 experts in the focus group. Tools used for data collection include 1) document synthesis record form 2) structured interview form, and 3) appropriateness check and usefulness evaluation form. The data were analyzed by content analysis. The research results found that 1) The internal quality assurance system in small schools consists of 1.1) determining policy and quality assurance standards; 1.2) personnel training and development; 1.3) context and needs analysis; 1.4) preparing development plans and operations; 1.5) monitoring and evaluation; and 1.6) preparing self-evaluation reports. 2) The internal quality assurance model in small schools consists of inputs, processes, products, outcomes, and impacts. 3) The usefulness of the internal quality assurance model in small schools is at a high level.

Article Details

How to Cite
Natun, J. (2024). Internal Quality Assurance Model for Small Schools. Rajapark Journal, 18(60), 529–543. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RJPJ/article/view/274665
Section
Research Article

References

Bardo, J.W., & Hartman, J.J. (1982). Urban sociology: A systematic introduction. F.E. Peacock.

Frazier, A. (1997). A roadmap for quality transformation in education. St. Lucie Press.

Harman, G. (1996). Quality assurance for higher education: Developing and managing quality assurance for higher education systems and institutions in Asia and the Pacific. UNESCO.

Jamonman, U. (1988). Research synthesis: Quantitative. Funny Publishing.

Kaewta, R. (2018). Guidelines for the development of internal quality assurance system operations of educational institutions in Kamphaeng Phet Province under the office of secondary education area 41. Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University.

Office of Educational Testing Service, Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2010). Continuing development of quality of education. Agricultural Cooperative Community Printing House of Thailand Co., Ltd.

Office of Policy and Planning. (2023). Comparative data for 5 academic years under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. http://www.bopp.go.th/?page_id=3544

Office of the Council of Rajabhat Institutes. (1997). Manual for quality assurance of Rajabhat Institute education. L.T. Press.

Office of the Secretary of the Education Council, Ministry of Education. (2018). National Education Standards 2018. Office of the Secretary of the Education Council, Ministry of Education.

Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University. (2022). Report of the faculty of education faculty meeting no. 2. Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University.

Phornrungroj, C. (2016). OHEC recommends the use of assessment results according to the guidelines for education quality assurance. https://www.kroobannok.com/78125#google_vignette

Pho-ngam, P. (2017). Current status, problems and development guidelines for internal quality assurance operations in educational institutions under the Office of Secondary Education Area 30[Master's thesis, Maha Sarakham University].

Srisa-ard, B. (2017). Preliminary research (10th ed.). Suwiriyasarn.

Songpan, W. (2015). The development of a school administration model to achieve quality assurance results, inside of the secondary school in the Andaman South[Doctoral dissertation, Hat Yai University].

Vroman, H.W., & Luchsinger, V.P. (1994) Managing organization quality. IRWIN.