Distributed Leadership Model of College English Teachers in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to study 1) the level of decentralized leadership of college English teachers in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 2) analyze the factors of decentralized leadership styles of college English teachers in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, and 3) propose a decentralized leadership style of college English teachers in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Using simple random sampling, the samples were 500 college professors and college English teachers from 68 colleges. The data collection instruments were a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyze the data. The results showed that: 1) the level of decentralized leadership of English teachers showed that the decentralized leadership level was more than 0.970, which means that the KMO value represents and follows the essential guidance of the main components. Moreover, the relationship for EFA of the decentralized leadership style of English teachers is significant. 2) Factors of the decentralized leadership style of English teachers in local colleges were found to have six components: 1. Team cooperation 2. School culture 3. Good leadership 4. General English teacher authority 5. Supervising leadership and six checking leadership. Moreover, 3) The decentralized leadership style of English teachers found that many connected and dynamic leaders explore supportive culture and learning, and teachers are all critical structures. College administrators and English teachers can promote characteristics that will help the institution succeed.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
Bektaş, F., Kilinç, A. Ç., & Gümüs, S. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning: mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation. Educational Studies, 48(185), 1-23. DOI:10.1080/03055698.2020.1793301
DeMarco, A.L. (2018). The relationship between distributive leadership, school culture, and teacher self-efficacy at the middle school level. Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 2594. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/2594
Fiorilli, C., Benevene, P., De Stasio, S., Buonomo, I., Romano, L., Pepe, A., & Addimando, L. (2019). Teachers' burnout: the role of trait emotional intelligence and social support. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02743
Kalkan, Ü., Altınay, A. F., Altınay, G. Z., Atasoy, R., & Dağlı, G. (2020). The relationship between school administrators’ leadership styles, school culture, and organizational image. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902081
Kilinç, A. Ç., Özdemir, N., Polatcan, M., Savaş, G., & Dolapci, E. (2023). Linking transformational leadership to teacher commitment and alienation: Do motivational climate profiles moderate?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(4), 1-20. DOI:10.1177/17411432231184602
Lin Q (2022) The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher innovativeness: mediating roles of teacher autonomy and professional collaboration. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 948152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948152
Liu, L., Liu, P., Yang, H., Yao, H., & Thien, L. M. (2022). The relationship between distributed leadership and teacher well-being: the mediating roles of organisational trust. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(4), 837-853.
https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221113683
Liu, H., Chu, W., & Wang, Y. (2021). Unpacking EFL teacher self-efficacy in livestream teaching in the Chinese context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 717129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717129
Kitkrajang, N., & Lapcharoen, S. (2024). Distribution of leadership by school administrators as perceived by the teachers in the secondary educational service area of Bangkok. Journal of MCU Buddhapanya Review, 9(4), 148-160. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmbr/article/view/267584
Prasertratana, S. (2012). A structural equation model of distributed leadership for essential school administrators[Doctoral dissertation, Khon Kaen University].
Pruttkul, S. (2023). Influence of school administrators’ academic leadership on the effectiveness of the school under Pathum Thani primary educational service area office 1[Master’s thesis, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi].
Saiphayasri, T., Yordsala, S., & Kakkaew, V. (2024). Guidelines for the distributed leadership development of school administrators under the Surin primary educational service area office 3. Sisaket Rajabhat University Journal, 18(1), 15–28. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sskrujournal/article/view/264634
Thien, L. M., & Chan, S. Y. (2022). One-size-fits-all? A cross-validation study of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism in Malaysian primary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220926506
Xu, S., Zhang, H., Dai, Y., Ma, J., & Lyu, L. (2021). Distributed leadership and new generation employees’ proactive behavior: roles of idiosyncratic deals and meaningfulness of work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 755513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755513
Zheng, X., Zhang, J., & Wang, W. (2019). Teacher learning as boundary crossing: a case study of master teacher studios in China. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 25(4), 1-19. DOI:10.1080/13540602.2019.1673358