Cost of Debt Affecting Sustainability of Listed Companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand SET ESG Ratings

Main Article Content

Arisara Thaneerananon
Premarat Vilalai

Abstract

The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of the cost of debt on three dimensions of sustainability performance: 1) environmental sustainability, 2) social sustainability, and 3) governance sustainability. This research adopts a quantitative approach. The sample comprises 256 companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) with ESG ratings. Data were collected from financial statements and SET Fin Lab (Bloomberg) covering the period from 2021 to 2023. Multiple regression analysis was employed to examine the relationships. The findings reveal that the cost of debt, as determined by the capital structure, has a significant impact on ESG sustainability performance. Specifically: 1) the cost of debt has a positive impact on environmental and social dimensions; 2) the cost of debt also shows an adverse effect on the social dimension; and 3) the cost of debt positively influences the governance dimension. These results suggest that a well-balanced cost of debt can enhance environmental and social sustainability. Long-term debt facilitates investments in responsible and sustainable activities, while an excessively high level of debt may increase financial risk and negatively affect corporate governance. Effective debt management promotes transparency and strengthens internal control systems, thereby contributing to long-term value creation for the firm.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thaneerananon, A., & Vilalai , P. (2025). Cost of Debt Affecting Sustainability of Listed Companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand SET ESG Ratings. Rajapark Journal, 19(64), 218–234. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RJPJ/article/view/280242
Section
Research Article

References

Atapolpitak, N. (2019). Corporate governance and cost of capital: an empirical study of listed firms in the stock exchange of Thailand. Journal of Federation of Accounting Professions, 1(1), 68-86. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JFAC/article/view/179926

Barua, S., & Saha, A. (2023). Integrative analysis of traditional and cash flow financial ratios: A systematic review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13040062

Baule, R. (2023). The cost of debt capital revisited. Business Research, 16(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0070-6

Chandratreya, A. (2025). Critical accounting theory and corporate social responsibility: A theoretical exploration. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, 9(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM41836

Chang, A., Meiryani, U., Sumarwan, U., Gunawan, T., Devi, S. R., & Salim, G. (2023). The influence of debt-to-equity ratio, capital intensity ratio, and profitability on effective tax rate in the tourism sector. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 12(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i1art5

Corporate Finance Institute. (n.d.). Cost of debt. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/valuation/cost-of-debt

Cucari, N., D’Angelo, E., & Esposito De Falco, S. (2020). Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta‐analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 251-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1806

Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005

Fiorillo, P., Meles, A., Ricciardi, A., & Verdoliva, V. (2025). ESG performance and the cost of debt: Evidence from the corporate bond market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 102, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104097

Jenkanob, T., & Loatong, P. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility towards Entrepreneurial Ethics. Journal of Management Science Research, Surindra Rajabhat University, 5(1), 82-93. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmsr/article/view/247291

Jiang, K., Zhang, J., Zhou, M., & Chen, Z. (2025). ESG disagreement and corporate debt maturity: Evidence from China. Financial Innovation, 11, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00724-1

Kotsantonis, S., Pinney, C., & Serafeim, G. (2016). ESG integration in investment management: Myths and realities. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12169

Meilanda, P., Fuadah, L. L., Mukhtaruddin, M., & Yusrianti, H. (2024). Development of the Role of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Capital Structure with Firm Value: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Research and Review, 11(12), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20241226

Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, L. T. (2024). The impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2024.122009

Parkatt, G., Pamornmarst, C., & Thavikitikul, Y. (2021). The use of debt in the capital structure and firm value of listed companies in the market for alternative investment. The Journal of Development Administration Research, 11(4), 747-760. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org

/index.php/JDAR/article/view/252824

Promlao, K. (2021). What is the ESG concept? Why is it popular among investors today?. TRIS CORP Thailand’s Leading Consulting Firm. https://www.tris.co.th/esg/

Santosuosso, P. (2024). Cost of debt and corporate profitability: Evidence from Italian unlisted firms. International Business Research, 17(2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v17n2p13

Sornsongkram, P. (2017). Environment, social, governance (ESG) and firm performance (Tobin's Q) of listed Thai energy and resources companies[Master’s thesis, Thammasat University].

Stewart, R. (2025, February 18). ESG and the changing language of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review. https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2025/02/esg-and-the-changing-language-of-corporate-social-responsibility/

Susilawati, S., Shavab, F.A., & Mustila, M. (2022). The effect of debt to equity ratio and current ratio on return on assets. Journal of Applied Business and Technology Research, 1(4), 325-337. DOI:10.54408/jabter.v1i4.61

Tawfiq, T. T., Tawaha, H., Tahtamouni, A., & Almasria, N. A. (2024). The influence of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on capital structure: an investigation of leverage and WACC. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(12), 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17120570

Thaneerananon, A. (2024). Agency costs and asset management efficiency influence the profitability of companies listed on the market for alternative investment (MAI). Rajapark Journal, 18(58), 491-502. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/RJPJ/article/view

/272889/182708

The Stock Exchange of Thailand. (2023). Summary of the results of sustainable development operations 2023. https://www.set.or.th/sd_report/th/2023/index.html

Uyar, A., Gerged, M.A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A.S. (2023). Do CSR performance and reporting facilitate access to debt financing in emerging markets? The role of asset structure and firm performance. Review of Accounting and Finance, 23(2), 157-185.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/1475-7702