แนวโน้มศักดิ์ศรีความเป็นมนุษย์ของพลเมืองไทย บนสมมุติฐานการเมืองแบบอุปถัมภ์
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
บทความนี้มีจุดหมายเพื่อนำเสนอแนวโน้มสถานการณ์ศักดิ์ศรีความเป็นมนุษย์ของพลเมืองไทยเชิงปฏิบัติในสังคม บนสมมุติฐานการเมืองแบบอุปถัมภ์ ภายใต้ระบอบการปกครองแบบประชาธิปไตย โดยใช้วิธีวิจัยเอกสาร ผลการศึกษาพบว่า แนวโน้มศักดิ์ศรีความเป็นมนุษย์ของพลเมืองไทย มีฐานะเป็นเพียงผู้รับอุปถัมภ์จากรัฐเท่านั้น มีผลมาจากระบบการเมืองแบบอุปถัมภ์ ที่มีการใช้กลไกความสัมพันธ์กับชนชั้นสูง นายทุนในประเทศและทุนข้ามชาติ ร่วมกับผู้ถืออำนาจในทั้งทางการเมืองและข้าราชการทุกหมู่เหล่า แนวโน้มการปกครองปรับเป็นระบอบคณาธิปไตย ส่งผลให้บทบาทและอำนาจอธิปไตยของพลเมืองไทยที่หาได้จากการเลือกตั้งลดต่ำลง การยกระดับคุณค่าศักดิ์ศรีความเป็นมนุษย์ของพลเมืองไทยให้สูงขึ้น พลเมืองไทยต้องเข้าใจในสิทธิ เสรีภาพ คุณค่าศักดิ์ศรีความเป็นมนุษย์ตามหลักกฎหมายอย่างถ่องแท้ก่อน ขณะเดียวกันนักวิชาการ นักกฎหมาย และพลเมืองไทย ร่วมกันส่งเสริมการกระจายอำนาจไปสู่ทุกภาคส่วนของประเทศ อีกทั้ง สถาบันการศึกษา องค์การสื่อสารมวลชน และพลเมืองไทย ร่วมรณรงค์เพื่อพัฒนาสิทธิมนุษยชนและศักดิ์ศรีความเป็นมนุษย์ของพลเมืองไทยให้เสถียรมากขึ้นต่อไป
Article Details
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ทัศนะและความคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในวารสาร ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความนั้น และไม่ถือเป็นทัศนะและความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการ
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Arunraur, S. (2007). The future of democratic development in the context of Thai society[Independent Study, King Prajadhipok’s Institute].
Assawaworarit, W. (2002). Thai culture: promote factors or obstruct the development of good governance[Individual Academic Report, King Prajadhipok’s Institute].
Bojanowski, J. (2015). Kant on human dignity: a response to Oliver Sensen. Kant-Studien, 106(1), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2015-0006
Bumrungjit, A. (2017). Something government Service Thai picture and new public management. In The 4th National Conference on Public Affairs Management “Public Affairs Management under Thailand 4.0”, August 4, 2017 (pp. 1288-1302). Khon Kaen University.
Chardchawarn, S. (2015). The comparative study of the relationship between politicians and civil servants in Thailand and international countries: recommendations for Thailand. King Prajadhipok’s Institute Journal, 13(1), 72-97. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/
kpi_journal/article/view/244203
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2540. (1997, October 11). Thai Government Gazette. Vol. 114, Part 55 a, pp. 1-262.
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2550. (2007, August 24). Thai Government Gazette. Vol. 124, Part 47 a, pp. 1-127.
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560. (2017, April 6). Thai Government Gazette. Vol. 134, Part 40 a, pp. 1-60.
Department of International Organization, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2024, May 16). Universal Declaration of Human Rights: UDHR. https://thai-inter-org.mfa.go.th/
Editorial Team 101. (2024, June 4). Retrospect 10 years ago the Coup d'état on 2014: Lessons from the lost decade of military dictatorship. https://www.the101.world/10-year-public-forum/
Government of Canada. (2022). The French Revolution and the organization of justice: Declaration of the rights of man and the citizen 1791. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/ilp-pji/rev5/index.html
Harnkiattiwong, T., Sanonts R., & Saengas, T. (2020). Patronage system and poverty problem in Thailand. Social Science Journal of Prachachuen Research Network, 2(3), 1-14. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/prn/article/view/247890
Issarachai, Y. (2020). Coup d'état 2014 (NCPO). King Prajadhipok's Institute.
Jullasikkee, J. (2015). Democracy and political parties[Individual Study, College of the Constitutional Court, Office of the Constitutional Court].
Kongklam, U. (2018). Policy Formulation in Special Economic Zone of Sa Kaeo. Governance Journal, 7(1), 378-395. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/gjournal-ksu/article/view/132139
Kaichan, K. (2023). Human dignity according to the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E. 2560. The Secretariat of The House of Representatives.
Kongkirati, P. (2023, January 18). The future of patronage politics. Matichonweekly. https://www.matichonweekly.com/column/article_640331
Kanchanakhundee, S. (2024, October 17). Dynasty Politics in Southeast Asia. The 101.world. https://www.the101.world/dynasty-politics-in-sea/
Kamoltrakul, K. (2009, October 31). Economic and political oligarchy. Prachatai Online. https://prachatai.com/journal/2009/10/26407
Lertdhamtewe, P. (2022). Human rights and the constitution-making in Thailand. King Prajadhipok’s Institute Journal, 20(3), 134–155. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kpi_journal/article/view/256838
Liengboonlertchai, P. (2023, June 30). Double coup: The constitution as a political tool. PRIDI BANOMYONG INSTITUTE. https://pridi.or.th/th/content/2023/06/1594
Mahakun, V. (2015). Leaders and Politics in a Democratic Regime[Individual Study, College of the Constitutional Court, Office of the Constitutional Court].
MGR Online. (2019, November 29). 2 Prime Minister, 2 Standard? (part 1). https://mgronline.com/daily/detail/9620000114336
Nammeung, N. (2020, February 12). Dissolution of the Party: Rule of Law or Legal War?. WAYMAGAZINE. https://waymagazine.org/dissolve-rule-by-law/
Nathipo, V. (2019, May 12). Clientelist State: The transition not pass of Thai government. Prachatai Online. https://prachatai.com/journal/2019/05/82446
Nathipo, V. (2022a). Clientelism under the NCPO regime: New networks in the old pattern. Journal of Social Sciences, 52(1), 1-29. https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ssjpolsci/article/view/669/484
Nathipo, V. (2022b, May 8). Who are patronizing?: Thai elections and the regression of democracy. Matichon Online. https://www.matichon.co.th/prachachuen/news_3329292
Nontapattamadul, K. (2015). Study of the patronage system and social problems in Thailand: Application by professional social workers. Journal of Social Work and Social Administration, 23(1), 177-197. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/swjournal/article/view/173817
Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission. (2021). Distinguishing between personal and public interests. https://www.nesdc.go.th/article_attach/article_file_20211130152550.pdf
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2025, February 26). Thai social conditions in the 4th quarter and overall for 2024. https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=13636&filename=socialoutlook_report
Office of the National Human Rights Commission of Thailand. (2012). A guide to understanding civil and political rights. Office of the National Human Rights Commission of Thailand.
Office of the National Human Rights Commission of Thailand. (2023, August 14). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: ICCPR. https://www.nhrc.or.th/th/International-obligations/2385
Office of the Permanent Secretary. (2021, 23 August). Human Rights Knowledge Set. https://asdd.mol.go.th
Pathmanand, U. (2022, September 7). Exploring political success: political families/worldviews. Matichonweekly. https://www.matichonweekly.com/column/article_597863
Phrakhru Wateethammawipat., Phrakhru Wijitrattanawat., Phrakhru Rurattanasutakor., & Chimhad, P. (2020). The patronage system and bargaining power of political parties. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat, 7(5), 62-75. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JMND/article/view/243127
Phongpaichit, P. (2014, October 31). Analysis ‘Thai state’ economic structural problem. Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI). https://tdri.or.th/2014/10/matichon-2014-10-31/
Pitidol, T. (2024, January 5). How can the Thai economy be strong if it is not protected?. https://setthasarn.econ.tu.ac.th//blog/detail/672
Pongsapich, A., & Kuwinpant, P. (2011). Patronage system. Winyoo.
Suwanik, S. et al. (2021, September 30). Thai socio-economic structure: Fragility amidst change. Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research. https://www.pier.or.th/abridged/2021/16/
Ramasoota, P. (2006). Communication strategy of Thaksin’s government 2. King Prajadhipok's Institute Journal, 4(1), 47-65. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kpi_journal/article/view/244701
Sakchar, M. (2014, May). Fighting corruption in transformation societies. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/thailand/11019.pdf
Sawasdee, S. N. (2022, November 27). Thai politic on 2022 in spotlight of Siripan Nogsuan Sawasdee. Matichonweekly. https://www.matichonweekly.com/hot-news/article_629460
Srichan, T., & Kosolkittiamporn, S. (2023). 20 years of national strategy for the development of Thailand. Journal of Modern Learning Development, 8(1), 413-435. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jomld/article/view/258310
Students Group 7, Ratchaprarop. (2017). The mechanism of checks and balances between the legislature, the executive, the judiciary and independent organizations under the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. Academic papers, King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
https://www.kpi-lib.com/elib/cgi-bin/opacexe.exe?op=mmvw&db=Main&skin=&mmid=8474&bid=25377
Sujjapongse, S. (2015). Reflecting human rights and culture in Thai society[Individual Study, College of the Constitutional Court, Office of the Constitutional Court].
Suntigul, P. (2017). The Development of Social Welfare Law. Journal of Social Work, 25(1), 42-69.
Suteecharuwat, P. (2021, June 27). If there is no structural solution, the BTS problem will continue to cycle and not go away. https://themomentum.co/closeup-pramualsuteecharuwat/
Suvanamongkol, P. (2021). Turning back, looking forward at decentralization of the Thai state: a dim light at the end of the tunnel. King Prajadhipok’s Institute Journal, 19(3), 119–136. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kpi_journal/article/view/249966
Takantha, A. (2020). Patronage system: obstacles to Thailand’s democratic citizen development. Journal of Peace Periscope, 1(2), 47-59. https://so09.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JPP/article/view/534
Tamajai, A. (2019, April 27). Crisis: political-economic, suggestion- principles, and solutions. Prachachat. https://www.prachachat.net/breaking-news/news-320013
Thai PBS Digital Media. (2024, May 22). 10 Years: NCPO to Coup d'état and the legacy left behind. https://www.thaipbs.or.th/now/content/1188
Thanapornpun, R. (1992, November 13). Liberal democratic capitalist culture and bureaucracy System. http://www.rangsun.econ.tu.ac.th
The Government Public Relations Department. (2023, December 8). 10 December Human Rights Days. https://www.prd.go.th/th/content/category/detail/id/31/iid/239597
The Secretariat of The House of Representatives. (2019). Citizens’ political participation. Bureau of Printing Services, The Secretariat of The House of Representatives.
TNN Excusive. (2024, September 16). Dissecting the patronage system in Thai society: roots, problems and outlet. https://www.tnnthailand.com/tnnexclusive/176305/
Tonsakulrungruang, K. (2020, January 17). Dissolve the party, dissolve the law, dissolve democracy. The 101.world. https://www.the101.world/party-dissolution-and-democracy/
Trachoo, S. (2012). The Constitution with Political Ideology in the Context of Thai. Journal of Thai Ombudsman, 5(2), 66-76. https://ombstudies.ombudsman.go.th/download/Journals/ebook55_2-5.pdf
Verawan, S. (2023, November 3). The rise of UngIng to power: The political business of the Shinawatra family. https://mgronline.com/daily/detail/9660000098893
Wangkittikul, P. (2017). Effect of Thaksin’s populism on politics in Thailand's democratic regime[Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University]. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/1169
Wongwarunyoo, T. (2020). The impact of the patronage system on performing the Civil Servant’s Duties in Loei Province. Research and Development Journal, Loei Rajabhat University, 15(54), 65-75. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/researchjournal-lru/article/view/243206
Worakit, I. (2020). Relationship and pattern of patronage system in local administrative organizations: a case study of local administrative organizations Ang-Thong province. The Journal of Development Administration Research, 10(4), 156-172. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDAR/article/view/245017
Yanyongkasemsuk, R., & Prasartset, S. (2018). Political culture of Thailand: structural problems. Burapha Journal of Political Economy, 6(2), 69-89. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pegbuu/article/view/199167
Yapanan, C. (2008). Inspection the government by judicial power. Journal Law, 5(5), 139-142.
