Information Threats: Lessons from the Russia–Ukraine and Gaza Conflicts for Thailand’s National Preparedness
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the contemporary era, information plays a critical role in shaping advantages in warfare, particularly in cognitive warfare that extends the battlefield into cyberspace. This study investigates patterns of information threats by collecting news reports, analyses, interviews, and academic literature related to such threats—including information operations, psychological operations, and cyber operations—based on case studies from the Russia–Ukraine war and the Gaza conflict. The analysis provides insights into the application of various strategic models in information operations, as well as countermeasures between conflicting parties, and compares these findings with Thailand’s current situation. The purpose is to draw lessons and propose preparedness measures for Thai government agencies to address information threats across four citizen-centered dimensions. The study finds that the Thai government should: (1) strengthen situational awareness by fostering fact-checking networks, integrating collaborative mechanisms, supporting the use of artificial intelligence to enhance the detection of cyber anomalies, and enabling real-time communication of factual information; (2) improve preventive effectiveness through cooperation with social media platforms and cybersecurity experts, as well as nationwide promotion of media and digital literacy; (3) enhance the efficiency of control and mitigation by developing proactive strategic communication capacities, alongside comprehensive regulation of information, social media platforms, and critical infrastructure in alignment with digital innovation; and (4) build resilience by safeguarding critical information systems at Thailand’s border areas. These measures collectively strengthen Thailand’s capacity to respond effectively to information threats.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Views and opinions appearing in the Journal it is the responsibility of the author of the article, and does not constitute the view and responsibility of the editorial team.
References
Aouragh, M. (2016). Hasbara 2.0: Israel’s public diplomacy in the digital age. Middle East Critique, 25(3), 271-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2016.1179432
Backes, O., & Swab, A. (2019). Cognitive warfare: The Russian threat to election integrity in the Baltic States. Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/2024-12/Cognitive%20Warfare%20%3D%20 The%20Russian%20Threat%20to%20Election%20Integrity%20in%20the%20Baltic%20States.pdf
Barucija, A. (2020). The historical evolution of Israeli intelligence. American Intelligence Journal, 37(1), 178-182. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27087696
Borch, O. J., & Heier, T. (2025). Preparing for hybrid threats to security: Collaborative preparedness and response. Taylor & Francis. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/93079/1/9781040153505.pdf
Claverie, B., & Du Cluzel, F. (2022). Cognitive warfare: The advent of the concept of “Cognitics” in the field of warfare. In Cognitive Warfare: The Future of Cognitive Dominance. https://hal.science/hal-03635889v1/file/NATO-CSO-CW%202022-03-01%20%28US%29%20
Claverie%20DuCluzel.pdf
Cordey, S. (2019). Trend Analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 - An OSINT-based study. Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich. https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/Cyber-Reports-2019-12-Unit-8200.pdf
Done, W. D. (2021). Russian cyber information warfare: International distribution and domestic control. Journal of Advanced Military Studies, 12(1), 112-127. DOI:10.21140/mcuj.20211201005
Done, W. D. (2023). The information technology army of Ukraine and cyber warfare doctrine. Journal of Strategic Security, 16(4), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.16.4.2127
Erlich, A., & Garner, C. (2021). Is pro-Kremlin disinformation effective? evidence from Ukraine. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211045221
France 24. (2025, May 7). Russia disinformation: France, Ukraine. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20250507-russia-disinformation-france-ukraine
Giannopoulos, G., Smith, H., & Theocharidou, M. (2021). The landscape of hybrid threats: A conceptual model (Public version). Publications Office of the European Union; Hybrid CoE. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f330dae9-6ad2-11ec-9136-01aa75ed71a1
Hajduk, J., & Stępniewski, T. (2016). Russia’s Hybrid War with Ukraine: Determinants, Instruments, Accomplishments and Challenges. Studia EUROPEJSKIE-Studies in European Affairs, (2), 37-52. https://journalse.com/russias-hybrid-war-with-ukraine-determinants-instruments-accomplishments-and-challenges/
Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies. https://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/0712hoffman.pdf
Jouini, M., Rabai, L. B. A., & Aissa, A. B. (2014). Classification of security threats in information systems. Procedia Computer Science, 32, 489-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.452
Levin, J. D. (2025, March-April). Information operations: Adapting to modern conflict. Military Review. U.S. Army Combined Arms Center. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/March-April-2025/Information-Operations/
Libicki, M.C. (1995). What is information warfare?. National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies, Washington DC. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA367662.pdf
Linakanit, J., & Tanawarit, T. (2025). Enhancing Cybersecurity Capacity: Thailand’s Challenges and Responses in the Context of Hybrid Warfare. Arts of Management Journal, 9(4), 1-23. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jam/article/download/280213/186016
Marushchak, A., Petrov, S., & Khoperiya, A. (2025). Countering AI-powered disinformation through national regulation: learning from the case of Ukraine. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1474034. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1474034
NATO. (2025, February 3). NATO’s approach to counter information threats. NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/uk/natohq/topics_219728.htm?selectedLocale=en
Opryshko, D. (2023). Monitoring media pluralism in the digital era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the EU, Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Turkey and Ukraine in 2022 (Research Project Report). Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF), European University Institute. https://cadmus.eui.eu/server/api/core/bitstreams/2d4d38e0-c6a7-5950-8ae7-756081d224a3/content
Reichborn-Kjennerud, E., & Cullen, P. (2022). What is hybrid warfare?. Norwegian Institute for International Affairs (NUPI).
Regan, M., & Sari, A. (Eds.). (2024). Hybrid threats and grey zone conflict: The challenge to liberal democracies. Oxford University Press.
Seniutienė, D., & Paulauskytė, L. (2024). Response to hybrid threats: Policies, concepts and strategic approaches. Public Security and Public Order, (36), 195-202. https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/vsvt/article/view/8553/6046
Sherstoboeva, E. (2024). Russian Bans on ‘Fake News’ about the war in Ukraine: Conditional truth and unconditional loyalty. International Communication Gazette, 86(1), 36-54. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17480485231220141
Theohary, C. A. (2018). Information warfare: Issues for congress. Congressional Research Service, 5. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/R45142.pdf
Topor, L., & Tabachnik, A. (2021). Russian cyber information warfare: International distribution and domestic control. Journal of Advanced Military Studies, 12(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.21140/mcuj.20211201005
TRT World. (2024). The art of deception: How Israel uses Hasbara to whitewash its crimes. https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/the-art-of-deception-how-israel-uses-hasbara-to-whitewash-its-crimes-12766404
Underwood, K. (2017). Cognitive Warfare Will Be Deciding Factor in Battle: Lt. Gen. Stewart’s Rem arks at DoDIIS17. Signal, The Cyber Edge. https://www.afcea.org/content/cognitive-warfare-will-bedeciding-factor-battle; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm-lVjRjLD4.
Ventre, D. (2012). Information warfare. John Wiley & Sons.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-report-november-2017/1680764666