The Study Correlation between Good Corporate Governance and Sustainability Report of Listed Companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand on the Economic Dimension
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to study the factors that contribute to good corporate governance and sustainability report of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. The samples were 558 companies, the data collected from the annual report documents within 3 years (2013-2015) from the company website. The correlation was analyzed to find the relation between good corporate governance and sustainability report by using multiple regression analysis. The study found that
1) The correlation between the good governance and the sustainability report of the listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand found that the variable influencing the sustainability report on the economic dimension, the variable of director meeting (MEET), the variable which affected the sustainability was the non-executive director variable (NED) and the variable of board size (BODSIZE).
2) The correlation between the good corporate governance and sustainability report of the listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand, considered from the groups which were related to the variables affecting the business sustainability for the economic dimension, it found that the different groups had the variables affecting the different sustainability report, such as the economic dimension of the industry and automotive group.
Article Details
References
2. นิพันธ์ เห็นโชคชัยชนะ. (2558). กรอบแนวคิดสำหรับการรายงานทางการเงิน.วารสารวิชาชีพบัญชี. 11(30): 78-84.
3. มัทนชัย สุทธิพันธุ์. (2556). ทางออกของธุรกิจไทยสู่หนทางแห่งการพัฒนาอย่างยั่งยืน. วารสารบริหารธุรกิจ.36(137): 38-50.
4. วิกิพีเดีย สารานุกรมเสรี. วิกฤตการณ์การเงินในเอเชีย พ.ศ. (2540). [Online] เข้าถึงได้จาก; https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki วิกฤตการณ์การเงินในเอเชีย_พ.ศ._2540. 2559.
5. สุทธิชา เกริกฤทธิ์. (2550). ความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างการจัดการกำไรกับสัดส่วนการถือหุ้นที่ถือโดยนักลงทุนสถาบันของบริษัทจดทะเบียนในตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย. บัญชีมหาบัณฑิต จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
6. Belal, A.R., Owen, D.L. (2007). The views of corporate managers on the current state of, and future prospects for, social reporting in Bangladesh: an engagement based study. Account.Audit.Account. J. 20(3): 472-494.
7. Baughn, C.C., McIntosh, J.C. (2007). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions. Corp SocResponsib Environ. Manag. 14(4): 189-205.
8. Cohen, J. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J.
9. DinithiDissanayake a, Carol Tilt a, and Maria Xydias-Lobo.2016. Sustainability reporting by publicly listed companies in Sri Lanka. Journal of Cleaner Production.129(2016): 169-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.086.
10. GiovannaMichelon and Antonio Parbonetti. (2010). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. J ManagGov. 6(2012): 477–509.
11. John C. and Coates, IV. (2007). The goals andpromise of the sarbanes–Oxley Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives.21(1): 91–116.
12. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2010).Multivariate data analysis.7th Ed. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
13. Lee, M.D.P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. Int.J. Manag. Rev. 10(1): 53-73.
14. MuhammadZahid and ZulkipliGhazali.(2015). Corporate sustainability practices among Malaysian REITs and property listed companies. World Journal of Science,Technology and Sustainable Development.12(2): 100-118.
15. Reddy, K., Gordon, L.W. (2010). The effect of sustainability reporting on financial performance: an empirical study using listed companies. J. Asia Entrepreneursh. Sustain. 6(2): 19-42.
